SCOTUS protects marriage equality

[AProudLefty]

So? What is wrong with him claiming a religion?
The Bible itself describes Christianity.

Nothing is wrong with it.

And human interpretations of the Bible are what define Christianity.

 

[Into the Night]

Well, about a third of mankind because, as I mentioned earlier, God revealed is "son" to a tiny portion of the middle east, long after much of the rest of the world already had established religion.

It was revealed to the world, Void.

 

[ZenMode]

I see you think the Old Testament applies to you. It doesn't. It describes another people and another time. Presentism fallacy.

No rational person, including me, believes any of the nonsense in the old or new testament has any relevance in the real world.

 

[Into the Night]

Are you denying that Jesus references an eternal lake of fire where souls go to be destroyed?

Of course not. Just more words games.

Waste somebody else's time.

FTFY

Inversion fallacy. Evasion. Answer the question put to you.

 

[Into the Night]

Nothing is wrong with it.

And human interpretations of the Bible are what define Christianity.

No, LeftNut. The Bible describes Christianity. You just nullified your own argument.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy. Evasion. Answer the question put to you.

Nope. Done with your idiotic word games and your constant need to avoid topics in favor of irrelevant details.

 

[Into the Night]

No rational person, including me, believes any of the nonsense in the old or new testament has any relevance in the real world.

Well, since you never read any of it, you're in no position to judge.
You are also not God. You don't get to speak for the whole world. Omniscience fallacy.

Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'real' means. Your word games won't work.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. Done with your idiotic word games and your constant need to avoid topics and favor of irrelevant detail.

Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your word games on me or anybody else, Void.

 

[AProudLefty]

No, LeftNut. The Bible describes Christianity. You just nullified your own argument.

Nope. Humans interpret the Bible.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your word games on me or anybody else, Void.

I'm blaming your word games on you.

 

[gfm7175]

It doesn't matter.

This is why you're not gaining any knowledge or understanding... your heart is hardened against it.

Any attempt to rationalize clearly immoral and psychopathic behavior it fruitless

According to what standard?
Why is that standard 'holy'?

The Bible is clear that you have to accept Jesus/God to be saved, otherwise your are destroyed in the eternal flames of hell.

It's actually worse than that.

 

[AProudLefty]

What is holy is interpreted by humans.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm blaming your word games on you.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

This is why you're not gaining any knowledge or understanding... your heart is hardened against it.

According to what standard?

Christians standards for morality.

Why is that standard 'holy'?

I didn't say it was.

It's actually worse than that.

irrelevant.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Expect you tough guy. You don't have the balls to address me directly. STFU you useless piece of shit

ThatBowelMovement is a cowardly little rodent. A rat hiding in the shadows nipping at those who can squash her like a bug.

 

[Uncensored2008]

They were unable to marry the person they loved, if that person was the same gender. So yes, it was about marriage.

Since they could have civil unions with identical legal rights, why the need to infringe real marriage?

 

[Uncensored2008]

View attachment 64906

Supreme Court rejects case seeking to overturn the right to same-sex marriage. Obergfell v. Hodges is highly unlikely to be reversed, and it was never going to happen in this dog of a case:

There was no case. The SCOTUS made no ruling. The court merely declined to hear the appeal.

You pretend to a victory you never won.

 

[AProudLefty]

Since they could have civil unions with identical legal rights, why the need to infringe real marriage?

What infringement?

 

[WinterBorn]

The possibility of having children can only take place between a man and woman, moron.

Not what I asked.

I asked if having children was what defined marriage.

Now, if a straight couple cannot conceive a child, are they allowed to marry?

 

[WinterBorn]

???

Marriage is the holy union between a man and a woman (which is the only gender combination by which procreation is possible)

So, in order to marry, a couple must be willing and able to have children?

If a straight couple cannot conceive a child, can they still marry?