Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

You need to get that tourettes syndrome worked on.

Pretty pathetic, isn't it? They wail banshees about a biased MSM, yet they cannot acknowledge the recorded proof of a false manipulation of information by Hannity. All these dummies must have been asleep when the issue of propaganda and how it's been used through history was discussed in school.

Pity the neocon....denial is their watchword, willful ignorance their strength.
 
Pretty pathetic, isn't it? They wail banshees about a biased MSM, yet they cannot acknowledge the recorded proof of a false manipulation of information by Hannity. All these dummies must have been asleep when the issue of propaganda and how it's been used through history was discussed in school.

Pity the neocon....denial is their watchword, willful ignorance their strength.


Taichicklet... that is WAY too many complicated words for usidiot. Here, let me translate for you....

Cons are bad, Dems are good... mmmk?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Pretty pathetic, isn't it? They wail banshees about a biased MSM, yet they cannot acknowledge the recorded proof of a false manipulation of information by Hannity. All these dummies must have been asleep when the issue of propaganda and how it's been used through history was discussed in school.

Pity the neocon....denial is their watchword, willful ignorance their strength.

Taichicklet... that is WAY too many complicated words for usidiot. Here, let me translate for you....

Cons are bad, Dems are good... mmmk?

When you can actually debate the issue, chuckles, let me know. Until then, stamp your widdle feet and stick out your tongue all you want. Oh, and thanks for proving my point.
 
Awww... what "issue" do you want to debate Chicklet? How about the issue of how Liberals are JUST as guilty of distorting quotes and taking things completely out of context, in order to support a misconception or lie? Nooo... you don't want to debate that one, do ya?
 
This is a discussion board, mastermind. You're fellow neocon parrot made a statement that wasn't true. I provided documented FACTS that proved him dead wrong. Rather than just acknowledge this, I get some BS from you generally attacking the source material while avoiding the content. So to date I have two willfully ignorant neocon parrots that refuse to acknowledge reality. You see, the quotes are from the Shrub himself....and can be checked by legitimate various news sources and the official White House record itself if need be. To date, no one can dispute the quotes I put here.

But you keep BS'ing toodles.....it's all you've got.

I don't have to prove anything to assholes who do nothing but insult..
as for the rest of your long winded BS...yawn. this thread was about Shaun Hannity, but hey, you think you won something, you win a blow up doll with a mouth in it as big as yours....now argue with it and don't do anything nasty with it..
 
Awww... what "issue" do you want to debate Chicklet? How about the issue of how Liberals are JUST as guilty of distorting quotes and taking things completely out of context, in order to support a misconception or lie? Nooo... you don't want to debate that one, do ya?

You do realize that there are recorded posts on this thread that people can read in chronological order and see what a pathetic lying fool you are, don't you?

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

You make a lot of accusations, but cannot prove one. To do that you would actually have to engage me in an honest debate....and since I've humilitated you time and again on these boards, you don't dare do so.

Carry on, you frustrated Confederated flag waving clown you!
 
Last edited:
You do realize that there are recorded posts on this thread that people can read in chronological order and see what a pathetic lying fool you are, don't you?

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

You make a lot of accusations, but cannot prove one. To do that you would actually have to engage me in an honest debate....and since I've humilitated you time and again on these boards, you don't dare do so.

Carry on, you frustrated Confederated flag waving clown you!

LMAO.... so your proof that Liberals don't distort and misrepresent what is said, is supported by distortions and misrepresentations of what was said! Brilliant! Did you come up with that all on your own?
 
Looks like in short order most people purt near pegged you for the whiney-assed-hand-wringing candy-assed Liberal you are Winnie.

Glad to see your picture!! You're even more of a wimp then I originally imagined.

Taichiliberal! What a flippin' joke. Pee Wee Herman could woop your ass!
 
LMAO.... so your proof that Liberals don't distort and misrepresent what is said, is supported by distortions and misrepresentations of what was said! Brilliant! Did you come up with that all on your own?

And please explain to the rational, educated audience how presenting DIRECT QUOTES IN PROPER CONTEXT is a "distortion" or a "misrepresentation"?

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister


Bravo made a statement that was NOT true...I presented valid, fact based evidence to the contrary. What's got you and the rest of the neocon parrots flustered is that you cannot deny the official record of the Shrub's SOU addresses. Only an insane, delusional or stupid person would do that.

So keep laughing chuckles, because your debating skills are indeed a joke.
 
Looks like in short order most people purt near pegged you for the whiney-assed-hand-wringing candy-assed Liberal you are Winnie.

Glad to see your picture!! You're even more of a wimp then I originally imagined.

Taichiliberal! What a flippin' joke. Pee Wee Herman could woop your ass!

Ain't that the truth! I bet he knows TaiChi like Barney Fife knows TaiChi! lol

Come to think of it, I can't imagine ANY liberal male winning a 'tough man' competition, can you? The way you can tell if you are in a fist fight with a liberal.... they'll be in the fetal position. :)
 
Looks like in short order most people purt near pegged you for the whiney-assed-hand-wringing candy-assed Liberal you are Winnie.

Glad to see your picture!! You're even more of a wimp then I originally imagined.

Taichiliberal! What a flippin' joke. Pee Wee Herman could woop your ass!

Ahhh, Freedumb's lapdog....the neocon calvary has arrived.

Pity you don't have the guts or brains to actually debate the issue, or deal with the FACTS Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister

And since I'm not a cruel man, I would strongly urge you NOT to vocalize your ignorance about Taichi in public too much...because the original form is NOT just what you see old folk do in the park. And although your adversary might not have my 5ft 11in 190lb frame, they could do some serious damage to you. My old sifu was still running his school at 75!

Oh well, I'm sure you'll have lots of maudlin exchanges with the other willfully ignorant neocon parrots here. Have fun, you Loyal end you!;)
 
I don't have to prove anything to assholes who do nothing but insult..
as for the rest of your long winded BS...yawn. this thread was about Shaun Hannity, but hey, you think you won something, you win a blow up doll with a mouth in it as big as yours....now argue with it and don't do anything nasty with it..

All one has to do is follow the chronology of the post to see you're lying. Bravo made an incorrect statement to which I responded. TFB for him and you that I logically proved him wrong and you can't refute that.

As for Hannity, other posters more than proved how that blowhard took a part of Obama's statement out-of-context and slapped on his supposition and conjecture to totally misconstrue and misrepesent what the man was saying. Why beat a dead horse?

So stop whining and deal with defeat like an adult, bunky. Trying to insult me won't change the fact that Hannity and Bravo are dead wrong.
 
All one has to do is follow the chronology of the post to see you're lying. Bravo made an incorrect statement to which I responded. TFB for him and you that I logically proved him wrong and you can't refute that.

As for Hannity, other posters more than proved how that blowhard took a part of Obama's statement out-of-context and slapped on his supposition and conjecture to totally misconstrue and misrepesent what the man was saying. Why beat a dead horse?

So stop whining and deal with defeat like an adult, bunky. Trying to insult me won't change the fact that Hannity and Bravo are dead wrong.

go play with your blow up doll..you're boring and long winded..I don't care about Hannity or you..ta ta
 
And please explain to the rational, educated audience how presenting DIRECT QUOTES IN PROPER CONTEXT is a "distortion" or a "misrepresentation"?

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Sean Hannity...propaganda minister


Bravo made a statement that was NOT true...I presented valid, fact based evidence to the contrary. What's got you and the rest of the neocon parrots flustered is that you cannot deny the official record of the Shrub's SOU addresses. Only an insane, delusional or stupid person would do that.

So keep laughing chuckles, because your debating skills are indeed a joke.

No, what you presented was a distortion of context, and did NOT show Bush said Saddam was responsible for 9/11, as Liberals have often inferred. In fact, Bush, Cheney, and others, OFTEN clarified just the opposite.

You further take out of context, the findings of the 9/11 commission, when congressmen sitting in Washington, looking at papers and documents only, said “no credible evidence of a collaborative relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda.” 1.) It doesn't mean one never existed. 2.) No one ever claimed a "collaborative relationship" existed, nor would it have to exist for Saddam to be giving aid to alQaeda terrorists.

You conveniently left out some other facts as well, which means your entire argument is out of context and dishonest. FACT: One of the bombers in the first attack on the WTC was living in Baghdad and getting a monthly stipend from the Saddam regime. FACT: On eight occasions, representatives of alQaeda met with representatives of Saddam's regime. FACT: alQaeda terrorists were training in Salman Pak, Iraq. FACT: Saddam personally sent Faruq Hijazi, IIS deputy director and later Iraqi ambassador to Turkey, to meet with bin Laden at least twice, first in Sudan and later in Afghanistan in 1999. FACT: The Director of Iraqi Intelligence, Mani abd-al-Rashid al-Tikriti, met privately with bin Laden at his farm in Sudan in July 1996.


Oooops!
 
No, what you presented was a distortion of context, and did NOT show Bush said Saddam was responsible for 9/11, as Liberals have often inferred. In fact, Bush, Cheney, and others, OFTEN clarified just the opposite.

You further take out of context, the findings of the 9/11 commission, when congressmen sitting in Washington, looking at papers and documents only, said “no credible evidence of a collaborative relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda.” 1.) It doesn't mean one never existed. 2.) No one ever claimed a "collaborative relationship" existed, nor would it have to exist for Saddam to be giving aid to alQaeda terrorists.

You conveniently left out some other facts as well, which means your entire argument is out of context and dishonest. FACT: One of the bombers in the first attack on the WTC was living in Baghdad and getting a monthly stipend from the Saddam regime. FACT: On eight occasions, representatives of alQaeda met with representatives of Saddam's regime. FACT: alQaeda terrorists were training in Salman Pak, Iraq. FACT: Saddam personally sent Faruq Hijazi, IIS deputy director and later Iraqi ambassador to Turkey, to meet with bin Laden at least twice, first in Sudan and later in Afghanistan in 1999. FACT: The Director of Iraqi Intelligence, Mani abd-al-Rashid al-Tikriti, met privately with bin Laden at his farm in Sudan in July 1996.

Oooops!

FACT: Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law stated categorically that all chemical and biological weapons stocks and the missiles to deliver them were destroyed after the first Gulf War.

FACT: Hussein Kamel was assassinated by Saddam in 1996 for this treason.

FACT: There were no WMD in Iraq, and no imminent threat that justified the war in 2003.

FACT: bush lied, hundreds of thousands died.

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/kamel.pdf

Oooops!
 
FACT: Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law stated categorically that all chemical and biological weapons stocks and the missiles to deliver them were destroyed after the first Gulf War.

FACT: Hussein Kamel was assassinated by Saddam in 1996 for this treason.

FACT: There were no WMD in Iraq, and no imminent threat that justified the war in 2003.

FACT: bush lied, hundreds of thousands died.

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/kamel.pdf

Oooops!

well if Bush lied, then these people are liars also....:eek:



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003
 
go play with your blow up doll..you're boring and long winded..I don't care about Hannity or you..ta ta

See, folks.....yet another neocon numbskull who can't honestly debate an issue. This clown throws a hissy fit because he can't logically or factually prove me wrong....so he sticks out his tongue and stamps off. What's really bizarre is that he claims he doesn't care about the very subject that he was ragging me about. Sounds like the boy is not wrapped to tight. Oh well, I hope he has a nice trip! :D
 
well if Bush lied, then these people are liars also....:eek:



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003

Imbecile....all the folk you quoted DID NOT advocate invasion. This is why you had a no fly zone, embargos, strategic air strikes AND INSPECTORS ON THE GROUND for the Clinton years. For all the opinions and observations, none of these folk advocated violation of HJ114 and the agreement with the UN. Clinton interrupted the UN WMD inspectors, but did NOT invade/occupy. The Shrub did. Big difference. And of course, you leave out a LOT of information.

www.bushlies.net

The Shrub's guilty, no matter how many times you deny the facts. Grow up and deal with it.
 
Imbecile....all the folk you quoted DID NOT advocate invasion. .

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

images-1.jpg
 
Back
Top