Segregation now, segregation forever!

[Taichiliberal]

Are you guys kidding me?

Plessy was a challange to a Louisiana law segregating train passengers. It was argued to the S.Ct that the 14th Amendment outlawed segregation and thus this Louisiana law was unconstitutional. The S.Ct. ruled that the 14th did not outlaw segregation because seperate does not necessarly mean unequal, the law was not declared unconstitutional. Plessy did not declare anything unconstitutional, thats the problem with Plessy!

This had nothing whatsoever to do with the CRA of 1875 AKA the Desegration Act of 1875. The CRA of 1875 was declared unconstitutional on other grounds years earlier. The Court did not even take up segregation in the CRA case.

Plessy was a test case intentionally pushed to the S.Ct by segregation opponants of the late 1800's...( I know Dixie thinks only a few such deadenders existed), in an attempt to use the 15th to force integration.


No wonder we are in such trouble, the Conservatives lack a basic education in American History!

WE really need to better job of educating our people.

You can't educate the bigoted, Confederate apologist that are willfully ignorant, who substitute their opinion, supposition and conjecture for facts and logic. You just let them scream from the tree stump as their numbers die off and people wise up and abandon them for the libraries to objectively corroborate historical events in a logical fashion.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You can't educate the bigoted, Confederate apologist that are willfully ignorant, who substitute their opinion, supposition and conjecture for facts and logic. You just let them scream from the tree stump as their numbers die off and people wise up and abandon them for the libraries to objectively corroborate historical events in a logical fashion.

What does your liquor bill run monthly? I am just wondering, because you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time, crocked out of your gourd, being belligerent on the Internet. I can't imagine you are getting your money's worth, I can think of dozens of more interesting things do do when I'm drunk. Perhaps you don't have a choice, the people around you, in your real life, can't stand your belligerence, so they send you off to your room to post anonymously online, while they talk about what to do about their "problem."

In any event, you apparently get the impression that people actually know what the fuck you're yammering about. Somehow, you think this makes you important and what you have to yammer about, profound. You seem to be showing signs of early brain damage, because you've begun repeating the same mindless phrases over and over again. I guess you've killed off too many brain cells over time, and have shot your short-term memory to hell. You should really try to lay off the sauce and dry out. Then, shut up!

 

[Taichiliberal]

What does your liquor bill run monthly? I am just wondering, because you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time, crocked out of your gourd, being belligerent on the Internet. I can't imagine you are getting your money's worth, I can think of dozens of more interesting things do do when I'm drunk. Perhaps you don't have a choice, the people around you, in your real life, can't stand your belligerence, so they send you off to your room to post anonymously online, while they talk about what to do about their "problem."

In any event, you apparently get the impression that people actually know what the fuck you're yammering about. Somehow, you think this makes you important and what you have to yammer about, profound. You seem to be showing signs of early brain damage, because you've begun repeating the same mindless phrases over and over again. I guess you've killed off too many brain cells over time, and have shot your short-term memory to hell. You should really try to lay off the sauce and dry out. Then, shut up!

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=636629&postcount=721


Hit a nerve, didn't I bunky? If I'm so insignificant, then don't respond...put me on IA...because I was talking to Jarod, NOT YOU. I've already proven what a lying, dishonest and delusional Confederate defending bigoted POS you are on this thread. You can deny, lie and regurgitate the SOS, but as the thread shows your convoluted, revisionist BS just doesn't stand in the light of day.

You can have the last word, you pathetic David Duke wanna be....Jarod has the patience to continually discredit your insipidly stubborn dumbass, I don't. I'll just watch from the sidelines, and send Jarod and others notes as I feel fit. You don't like it, TFB---there's not a damned thing you can do about it but stamp your widdle feet and spew venom in frustration. Carry on, McDuff!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I've already proven what a lying, dishonest and delusional Confederate defending bigoted POS you are on this thread. You can deny, lie and regurgitate the SOS, but as the thread shows your convoluted, revisionist BS just doesn't stand in the light of day.

Was that the part where I said you were correct in stating how the Civil War started, and that it wasn't begun over slavery? I knew agreeing with something that came from you was a risk, I just had no idea of how bad it really was. I thought WE made a great point about it myself.

I've not defended anything other than the right of people to respect their dead soldiers. I understand there is a lot of ignorance when it comes to the Civil War, the Confederacy, and the issues of the day. I don't mind educating the ignorant as long as they show a willingness to learn, but I realize I can't force you to educate yourself.

If you want to believe it is "delusional" to point out to Jarhead that we didn't actually outlaw "segregation" in 1875, that is entirely up to you. I really think it is more in line with what David Duke would claim, but hey... that's what you want to believe, and I can't stop you!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I've already proven what a lying, dishonest and delusional Confederate defending bigoted POS you are on this thread. You can deny, lie and regurgitate the SOS, but as the thread shows your convoluted, revisionist BS just doesn't stand in the light of day.

Was that the part where I said you were correct in stating how the Civil War started, and that it wasn't begun over slavery? I knew agreeing with something that came from you was a risk, I just had no idea of how bad it really was. I thought WE made a great point about it myself.

I've not defended anything other than the right of people to respect their dead soldiers. I understand there is a lot of ignorance when it comes to the Civil War, the Confederacy, and the issues of the day. I don't mind educating the ignorant as long as they show a willingness to learn, but I realize I can't force you to educate yourself.

If you want to believe it is "delusional" to point out to Jarhead that we didn't actually outlaw "segregation" in 1875, that is entirely up to you. I really think it is more in line with what David Duke would claim, but hey... that's what you want to believe, and I can't stop you!