Selective outrage is hypocrisy.

EdwinA said:
Ah, more rubbish 'points' from the party of freak shows, violent street thugs, kiddie grooming deviants and its fans.
Click to expand...
It is just a snapshot of his hateful stances. I do not know if he really felt that way or found it as an avenue to wealth and importance. He was a hater and encouraged others to hate. He was very judgmental and led the way for haters to be more so. A truly religious person would not hate gays and trans who are trying to find their way in a world tht haters are teaching to be more judgmental and proud of their hate. They act as god made them. Who would choose to be gay or in the wrong sex, in a world that would torture them?
 
Nordberg said:
It is just a snapshot of his hateful stances. I do not know if he really felt that way or found it as an avenue to wealth and importance. He was a hater and encouraged others to hate. He was very judgmental and led the way for haters to be more so. A truly religious person would not hate gays and trans who are trying to find their way in a world tht haters are teaching to be more judgmental and proud of their hate. They act as god made them. Who would choose to be gay or in the wrong sex, in a world that would torture them?
Click to expand...
You didn't follow him, did you? You've just read 5 or 6 "quotes'...
 
Yakuda said:
What a load of horse shit. You're so fuckig happy hes dead you've probably creamed your shorts a hundred times since you found out.
Click to expand...
I am happy for him getting what he thought was 'worth it'.

Again if you anything resembling a good person you are not ok with kids dying and do not support 'others' being the one to pay the price you are happy with as you think it is 'worth it'.

A good person is happy to pay the cost they are ok seeing others pay for something they want and support.
 
Cypress said:
Very few, if any MAGA morons here on JPP ever mentioned how tragic this is for his children, which was practically the first thing I thought of.

The MAGA puppets have been almost exclusively focused on how to mold this into a political advantage
Click to expand...
MAGA isn't a person, moron. He was assassinated for political reasons. The Democrats did this for political reasons.
 
Cypress said:
You're not Melania, and you don't get to claim credit for the civilized etiquette other people show.

I specifically said that MAGA morons on JPP didn't give a shit about Charlie Kirk as a human being, or about the fate of his children. And you all prove that by using his murder almost exclusively for political profit.
Click to expand...
MAGA isn't a person, moron. You don't get to blame the problems of Democrats an on acronym.
 
Margot said:
View attachment 59338
Click to expand...
When Kirk said "stoning gay people" he was quoting a bible verse in response to Ms. Rachel quoting a different one, he was mocking Ms. Rachel for selective cherry picking of bible verses, not promoting actual death penalties for gay people, let alone by stoning.

  • Posthumous clarification by Stephen King: After Kirk's assassination in September 2025, author Stephen King mistakenly claimed on X that Kirk had advocated for stoning gay people. King later retracted this, clarifying that Kirk had not advocated for the practice but had used the passage to criticize others' interpretations of the Bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP

Right-Wing Activists Urge Followers to Expose Those Celebrating Kirk Killing​


In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, right-wing influencers and at least one Trump administration official have actively encouraged people to scour the internet for remarks celebrating the killing and to expose those who have posted them online.

The widespread and fast-moving campaign of naming-and-shaming has already resulted in countless lost jobs, professional suspensions and internal investigations, exacerbating the already fraught tensions over the shooting that exist online.


Right wing still has not condemn the Jan. 6 thugs who beat up 150 cops.
 
Another one who didn't follow Charlie.... Dr King would have liked Charlie much better than you.. And had more respect for him...
 
TOP said:
You didn't follow him, did you? You've just read 5 or 6 "quotes'...
Click to expand...
Follow him? I read his statements for years. Are you saying you can justify what he said? I have seen him on TV a few times. It was not someone I would seek out for guidance. Apparently, you agree with those ideas. But we all know what kind of right-wing person you are.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
Kirk was an equal opportunity hater who called Martin Luther King, Jr. “awful,” and “not a good person,” while insisting, “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”
Click to expand...
I'd like to see the full context of the "awful" statement, was he talking about how he cheated on his wife, his tendency to support what seems to be socialism?

He, very often, propounded the idea that the content of your character should matter more than your skin tone, so I don't think he thought the idea of equality was "awful". While controversial the idea that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake may be largely based on the way it divides the nation by skin color and began a course where we seem to focus on "race" rather than character.
 
Damocles said:
I'd like to see the full context of the "awful" statement, was he talking about how he cheated on his wife, his tendency to support what seems to be socialism?

He, very often, propounded the idea that the content of your character should matter more than your skin tone, so I don't think he thought the idea of equality was "awful". While controversial the idea that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake may be largely based on the way it divides the nation by skin color and began a course where we seem to focus on "race" rather than character.
Click to expand...
White washing history , what MAGA is very good and as Kirk knew
 
See that's what you don't understand ...he would have sat down with you and talked with you about what you just said.... So that even if you didn't seek him out for guidance you would Actually understand what he was saying... This isn't about whether I agree with what he's saying because i'm not having a discussion with him... You should try that....actually discussing something with someone instead of accusing them of being or thinking something they're not...
Nordberg said:
Follow him? I read his statements for years. Are you saying you can justify what he said? I have seen him on TV a few times. It was not someone I would seek out for guidance. Apparently, you agree with those ideas. But we all know what kind of right-wing person you are.
Click to expand...
 
You cannot pretend he did not say the offensive, racist, and destructive things he has said. He said horrible things about gays, trans people, lefties and anyone else he felt like disparaging. He was a divider.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top