Senate approves historic legislation to protect same-sex marriages

and yet, ou have not shown yourself to be smarter than me...........

Yes I have.

You are just not smart enough to understand it.

You are not smart enough to know grammar.

Here, allow me to correct your atrocious grammar. “you have not shown yourself to be smarter than I.”

You’re welcome.
 
then it should be easy enough for you to prove by showing the part of the US Constitution that requires us, as citizens, to blindly obey the mandates of God. we'll wait.

The first letter of a sentence must be in the upper case.

You are semi-illiterate.

Christians do not blindly follow, they are divinely led by God.
 
The first letter of a sentence must be in the upper case.

You are semi-illiterate.

Christians do not blindly follow, they are divinely led by God.

if that's all you have, grammar nazism and 'just the way it is' mentality, you have not shown yourself to be smarter than anyone, except maybe evince.
 
nope......just pointing out that Obama's increase of $9.8T is only 4.8% short of "doubling".....that happened BEFORE Trump was president.......obviously you are being petty......

Being petty for using your words exactly as you wrote them?

take all those deficits......add them together.......include the deficits of every other president ever elected.......now double it......we call that the Obama presidency......

I guess anyone is "petty" if they don't ignore your written statements.

It seems that it is you being petty since your statement as written was false and now you want to call anyone that uses your statement names to hide your errors. Either Trump was elected or he was not elected. You don't get to claim the Presidency ended when Obama left office.
 
if that's all you have, grammar nazism and 'just the way it is' mentality, you have not shown yourself to be smarter than anyone, except maybe evince.

It’s not allI I have, as you just learned.

Smart people use correct grammar, high school dropouts do not.
 
I would posit that the Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, thought that the generations to come would be “smart” enough not to attempt to marry the same sex...or a horse, or a cow.
 
the last 14 years here, even the last few months, should show you the stupidity of your belief about my surrendering.............That it hasn't, that you've fallen prone to doing the same exact thing that the lib'ruls here do tells us all that you don't think for yourself, that you just react.

so you do you agree that the government has no business telling people to change their understanding of "marriage" to that which the lib'ruls demand us to accept?.....or did you surrender?.....
 
and is it a requirement of civilization to follow all of Gods laws/mandates?

no, but civilization itself is premised upon some kind of agreed upon framework for behavior, aka morality, whether derived from a specific religion or from more generalized system of some kind of cooperative behavior.

like no murdering....etc.
 
so you do you agree that the government has no business telling people to change their understanding of "marriage" to that which the lib'ruls demand us to accept?.....or did you surrender?.....

my statement was that government had no business dealing with marriage, period. it's not in the constitution, much like abortion isn't. they have no power to deal with either and should be a state issue, with the exception of the full faith and credit clause.
 
Back
Top