Senator Vomit Barfs On The First Amendment

Flanders

Verified User
Schumer Calls for Amending First Amendment to Limit Political Speech
By Terence P. Jeffrey
July 31, 2019 | 4:27 AM EDT

https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/...ending-first-amendment-limit-political-speech

The truth is: Upchuck Schumer & Company are sick to death because freedom of speech on social media is weakening their grip on television’s control over political dialogue. Senator Vomit would better serve the country if he went after freedom of the press:

Notice that the press would still enjoy freedom of speech like the rest of us, but they would have to defend freedom of speech as a matter of self-interest instead of only defending their constitutional privilege while they feed the rest us to Socialist/Communist wolves.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Of-Freedom-Of-The-Press&p=2931557#post2931557

Where would the welfare state be today without television? Indeed, every bit of Communist garbage —— every Democrat Party policy —— was dumped on this country by television. Print press never could have created the parasite class without television mouths selling every tax dollar Socialist program.

Parenthetically, yesterday I heard Bret Baier say something that gave me a laugh. I cannot find the video; so I have to paraphrase his comment. It went something like this:

When the campaign season starts in January.

Exactly what in hell does Baier think was going on since the first Democrat clown, John Delaney, announced his campaign in July 2017? And how much coverage did FOX give Sleepy Joe Biden’s campaign months before he announced he was running? And if Democrats are not campaigning in town halls around the country, what in hell are they doing on television?

It just occurred to me that maybe it ain’t campaigning when Democrats debate on television. In fact, it might not be campaigning when Democrat hopefuls pay television mouths to talk about them before and after a debate. One mention is worth a few grand when it comes back a hundredfold in the form of donations.

Bottom line: Television mouths opened the presidential campaign season less than a second after Donald Trump took the oath. From now on the campaign season will never end for one reason, Everybody gets rich on a four year presidential campaign season, while the suckers who donate to the wannabes get poorer.
 
So you defend lying as a part of free speech?

Why not, everybody lies! America has survived lying for more than 200 years. It's your duty to sort the lies out from the truth and act accordingly. Leave the Democrats Jimmy & become truly informed by truths!

If Schumer is successful at outlawing lying he's one of the first to go in the slammer!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Brent_Bozell_III


right wing propaganda owned by this right wing asshole



Views and controversies[edit]
Bozell has been accused of making racially insensitive statements: on December 22, 2011, he appeared on Fox News and asked how the media would react if someone said that President Barack Obama looks like a "skinny ghetto crackhead,"[30][31] reacting to MSNBC's Chris Matthews's assertions that Newt Gingrich "looks like a car bomber" with "no media backlash."[32]
In February 2013, Bozell accused Karl Rove's American Crossroads group of waging "gang warfare" on the Tea Party movement. Rove's organization had launched a new SuperPAC called the Conservative Victory Fund, which aimed to help moderate Republicans survive primary challenges from candidates which Rove believed had narrower appeal in a general election. After Jonathan Collegio of American Crossroads responded to the charge by calling Bozell a "hater," some Tea Party leaders called for Collegio to be fired.[33]
Bozell was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump during the 2016 Republican primaries, describing him as "the greatest charlatan of them all", "a "huckster" and "shameless self-promoter".[34] He said, "God help this country if this man were president."[34] After Trump clinched the Republican nomination, Bozell attacked the media for their "hatred" of Trump.[34] Politico noted, "The paradox here is that Bozell was once more antagonistic toward the president than any journalist."[34] Bozell singled out Jake Tapper for being "one of the worst offenders" in coverage of Trump, however several senior MRC staff told Politico that they considered Tapper a model of fairness.[34
 
Why not, everybody lies! America has survived lying for more than 200 years. It's your duty to sort the lies out from the truth and act accordingly. Leave the Democrats Jimmy & become truly informed by truths! If Schumer is successful at outlawing lying he's one of the first to go in the slammer!

Julius Streicher and the other Nazi propagandists would have said that. I bet they said that.

There will be truth in political advertising laws on the way.

If any politician does it, he should be dismissed from a political race and fined heavily, personally from his own assets and not the campaign funds.

No true-blue decent American wants to elect government your way, Robo.
 
Why not, everybody lies! America has survived lying for more than 200 years. It's your duty to sort the lies out from the truth and act accordingly. Leave the Democrats Jimmy & become truly informed by truths!

If Schumer is successful at outlawing lying he's one of the first to go in the slammer!

How often does Trump lie??????
 
immymccready Lying is not a part of free speech. Ask a relevant question, please.

use the quote function, please. it does help with responses. and my question is relevant.....do you support lying to coerce confessions of criminal activity

You are nobody, StY, and certainly not empowered to demand anything. Step off. :)

Your question has been competency answered. It was a logic fallacy having nothing to do with the OP
 
Maybe you should be debating the Fifth Amendment. That is the one that protects both the guilty, and the not guilty, from the need to lie.

Julius Streicher and the other Nazi propagandists would have said that. I bet they said that.

There will be truth in political advertising laws on the way.

If any politician does it, he should be dismissed from a political race and fined heavily, personally from his own assets and not the campaign funds.

No true-blue decent American wants to elect government your way, Robo.

not fallacious at all, serious question. you seem to be saying that lying is not included in free speech. is lying to coerce confessions part of free speech?

Lying is not a part of free speech. Ask a relevant question, please.

use the quote function, please. it does help with responses

and my question is relevant.....do you support lying to coerce confessions of criminal activity

immymccready Lying is not a part of free speech. Ask a relevant question, please.



You are nobody, StY, and certainly not empowered to demand anything. Step off. :)

Your question has been competency answered. It was a logic fallacy having nothing to do with the OP
 
Last edited:
Maybe you should be debating the Fifth Amendment. That is the one protects both the guilty, and the not guilty, from the need to lie.

so what is violated when the law states that you are prohibited from lying to law enforcement, but they can use lies and deception to coerce confessions?????
 
Back
Top