Senator Vomit Barfs On The First Amendment

immymccready Lying is not a part of free speech. Ask a relevant question, please.



You are nobody, StY, and certainly not empowered to demand anything. Step off. :)

Your question has been competency answered. It was a logic fallacy having nothing to do with the OP

The right-wing often enjoys just pissing in the wind on forums like this. It's validating to them and to some it's all they got.
 
The right-wing often enjoys just pissing in the wind on forums like this. It's validating to them and to some it's all they got.

so you took offense that I blasted jimmys bullshit position and decided to come in and say something? i'd call that pissing in the wind to validate yourself.
 

To SmarterthanYou:
The law does not prohibit. The Law punishes after liars get caught.


To SmarterthanYou:
Deception is trickery. Coercion can be threats or physical force.

so when government agents tell a 'suspect' that they have his DNA, so if he doesn't just confess then they will go for the death penalty, that isn't deception and coercion when they did NOT have DNA??????? in other words, they LIED??????
 
Schumer is the biggest liar in the Senate.

Show how you determine who is lying, how often they lie and how serious the lie is. Then give us a list of who is the worst liars are. Then we can discuss a stupid statement like that. I am sure you have some way of measuring and weighing such a thing. So show us.
 
Schumer Calls for Amending First Amendment to Limit Political Speech
By Terence P. Jeffrey
July 31, 2019 | 4:27 AM EDT

https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/...ending-first-amendment-limit-political-speech

The truth is: Upchuck Schumer & Company are sick to death because freedom of speech on social media is weakening their grip on television’s control over political dialogue. Senator Vomit would better serve the country if he went after freedom of the press:

Notice that the press would still enjoy freedom of speech like the rest of us, but they would have to defend freedom of speech as a matter of self-interest instead of only defending their constitutional privilege while they feed the rest us to Socialist/Communist wolves.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Of-Freedom-Of-The-Press&p=2931557#post2931557

Where would the welfare state be today without television? Indeed, every bit of Communist garbage —— every Democrat Party policy —— was dumped on this country by television. Print press never could have created the parasite class without television mouths selling every tax dollar Socialist program.

Parenthetically, yesterday I heard Bret Baier say something that gave me a laugh. I cannot find the video; so I have to paraphrase his comment. It went something like this:

When the campaign season starts in January.

Exactly what in hell does Baier think was going on since the first Democrat clown, John Delaney, announced his campaign in July 2017? And how much coverage did FOX give Sleepy Joe Biden’s campaign months before he announced he was running? And if Democrats are not campaigning in town halls around the country, what in hell are they doing on television?

It just occurred to me that maybe it ain’t campaigning when Democrats debate on television. In fact, it might not be campaigning when Democrat hopefuls pay television mouths to talk about them before and after a debate. One mention is worth a few grand when it comes back a hundredfold in the form of donations.

Bottom line: Television mouths opened the presidential campaign season less than a second after Donald Trump took the oath. From now on the campaign season will never end for one reason, Everybody gets rich on a four year presidential campaign season, while the suckers who donate to the wannabes get poorer.

Do you ever write in reasonable non-slanted unemotional terms? Are you able to talk without first insulting and pissing readers off? Sen Vomit?Sleepy Joe, Democratic clown. Is that how you think an informative conversation can start? Or is this just an attempt to show your crazy right-wing credentials and your hope to lure others like you in a conversation of similar insults and slurs?
 
Can you name one lie he has told?

Looks like you are the one lying!

Supreme Court nominees are not going to prejudice themselves by announcing how they’ll decide on any case, but that didn’t stop Schumer. He said he will oppose Kavanaugh unless he can swear to uphold “precedent.” How can he make this demand? Because – he said – previous Supreme Court nominees “swore to obey precedent” in their confirmation hearings – Justice John Roberts specifically.

https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/chuck-schumers-big-fat-lies

Now attack the source.
 
Show how you determine who is lying, how often they lie and how serious the lie is. Then give us a list of who is the worst liars are. Then we can discuss a stupid statement like that. I am sure you have some way of measuring and weighing such a thing. So show us.

You determine that someone is lying when they make a statement that they know is false.
 
Here are Shumers. 4 on 1 page,ttps://www.politifact.com/personalities/charles-schumer/statements/byruling/false/ Can rlghtys see the difference, Leftys, and other honest people can.
 
Back
Top