Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
'defund the police' is lame.
look at the details of my post. sheriffs are elected by the people, therefore are held accountable to the people. your city cop is not.law enforcment is still part of government even if its locally elected.
it's still government.look at the details of my post. sheriffs are elected by the people, therefore are held accountable to the people. your city cop is not.
stop making false allegations. I was never with BLM nor did I ever endorse defund, unless it was the ATF, DEA, and IRSit's still government.
where are you on defund the police, still with BLM?
so what do you want to come out of all your weird concerns about cops?stop making false allegations. I was never with BLM nor did I ever endorse defund, unless it was the ATF, DEA, and IRS
Not quite. Now while the cases you sighted are valid, what's fascinating is the hair split of protecting "the public" versus the "individual citizen". individual: www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/useless examples that mean absolutely nothing to the issue of law enforcements duty to protect
1. You're welcome.Thanks for the insults and personal attacks. It's people like you which is why I never trust Democrats. MAGAts are simply the flip-side of what Democrats have been pushing for 30 years. Sad.
1. No worries.1. You're welcome.
2. A flimsy excuse at best. You are DOCUMENTED as being condescending and insulting when it suits you. Seems you can dish it out, but you can't take it.
3. Translation: Dutch got nailed doing the gun monkey shuffle, and he doesn't like it. So he shifts gears to whine about his widdle fee-fees getting hurt.
QED.
You didn't, but that is the goal of the Democratic Party as it's been since Bill Clinton. Hillary confirmed it in the 2016 election that she favored an "Australian-style" gun ban meaning mandatory confiscation. This won't work, especially with an ultra-conservative SCOTUS in place for the next few decades. I suggest another strategy to achieve the same goal: reduce gun violence and save American lives without...I didn't say BAN guns, BUT put reasonable controls on the ones like the AK 47's , hand guns , butt stocks , things like that . NOT take them away or anything like that.
How awesome for you to be so righteous! You could be MAGAt!!!!Regurgitating your opinions, supposition and conjecture neither refutes or disprove my previous post.
Sorry Dutch. But you've been documented on this thread over the years in flame wars with other posters. And you get snarky regarding the gun control issue. You can deny it, but anyone who's been on this site for a few years knows of what I speak.1. No worries.
2. Thanks for your opinions.
3. Meh. I expect all political extremists to be upset with disagreements.
It is indeed true.I recently watched some podcaster state that while you can be on a "terrorist" watch list (whether you're actually one or not) that can prevent you from getting on an airplane, you can still buy as many guns you want, depending on individual state laws.
Is this true? If so, does that make sense to you and why?
So asking for decent fact based debates and honest, rational and logical responses is considered "righteous: by you? Jeez Dutch, you should apply for a job with Fox News or as an assistant to Scott Jennings.How awesome for you to be so righteous! You could be MAGAt!!!!![]()
No, but it's understandable why a political extremist would completely miss the point. No worries!So asking for decent fact based debates and honest, rational and logical responses is considered "righteous: by you? Jeez Dutch, you should apply for a job with Fox News or as an assistant to Scott Jennings.