Seriously, how dumb are Trumppers...?

WOW, it's almost like you're talking about democrats as well :thinking:

The difference is that I believe Biden might be guilty, I’m simply waiting for evidence.

It’s pretty obvious that his son was using the name in Waze that he absolutely should not have done.


The evidence is very clear against Trump, and Trump‘s son-in-law was clearly using the White House for things he should not have been doing.
 
The difference is that I believe Biden might be guilty, I’m simply waiting for evidence.

It’s pretty obvious that his son was using the name in Waze that he absolutely should not have done.


The evidence is very clear against Trump, and Trump‘s son-in-law was clearly using the White House for things he should not have been doing.

You're fucking delusional. Trump done made your cheese slip off'n your cracker.

GTFO here with that bullshit, you TDS nutbar. Come back when more grounded in reality.
 
The difference is that I believe Biden might be guilty, I’m simply waiting for evidence.

It’s pretty obvious that his son was using the name in Waze that he absolutely should not have done.


The evidence is very clear against Trump, and Trump‘s son-in-law was clearly using the White House for things he should not have been doing.
What do you believe Biden is guilty of? Without evidence?
 
Don’t you think a genuine “objective observer” might want the answers to the three questions I proposed? By your standards, every jackass lefty on JPP is an “objective observer”. They look at what they can see of the case, and say “well, obviously they’re in some kind of brainwashed cult. A real judge says he’s guilty! I’ve seen enough!”

So I’ll ask only one question this time: when they liquidate Trump’s assets to the tune of a quarter of a billion dollars, who gets the money?
The State of New York. When NY sued Trump for the $2 million charity fraud, the money was distributed to legitimate charities.
 
The difference is that I believe Biden might be guilty, I’m simply waiting for evidence.
you make very clear that your burden of proof is very different for republicans than it is for democrats........making you look just as petty as any trumper

It’s pretty obvious that his son was using the name in Waze that he absolutely should not have done.

The evidence is very clear against Trump, and Trump‘s son-in-law was clearly using the White House for things he should not have been doing.

again, your standards of proof are two very different standards, depending on the 'suspect'
 
you make very clear that your burden of proof is very different for republicans than it is for democrats........making you look just as petty as any trumper



again, your standards of proof are two very different standards, depending on the 'suspect'

Maybe, I try to be objective. I think you limited me in with other partisans. Did I declare Trump guilty before there was evidence linking him to crimes? I don’t think so.
 
Maybe, I try to be objective. I think you limited me in with other partisans. Did I declare Trump guilty before there was evidence linking him to crimes? I don’t think so.

jarod, I try very hard to be objective about most people, including you, but stop lying. with absolutely zero real evidence, all of it circumstantial, the democrat led house impeached trump and you were cheering for it, all along.

you are either very aware of what you're doing with your partisanship and just not caring about it, or you truly believe this crap about you, which is even scarier and shows that you do not live in reality
 
Maybe, I try to be objective. I think you limited me in with other partisans. Did I declare Trump guilty before there was evidence linking him to crimes? I don’t think so.

Biiitch! You don't know what objectivity is.

What ya think about this?

 
The State of New York. When NY sued Trump for the $2 million charity fraud, the money was distributed to legitimate charities.

Funny how the MAGA morons are stone silent about this Trump crime. He paid the $2 million fine so that's essentially an admission of guilt. Although stealing money from a charity is pretty egregious, the MAGA morons will continue to suck Trump's dick. More proof they're deep in the cult.

Trump paid $2 million judgment for misusing his charity, New York attorney general says
The court-ordered settlement money will go to eight charities.

President Donald Trump has paid $2 million in a court-ordered judgment for misusing his charity, New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement Tuesday.

"Not only has the Trump Foundation shut down for its misconduct, but the president has been forced to pay $2 million for misusing charitable funds for his own political gain," James said. "Charities are not a means to an end, which is why these damages speak to the president's abuse of power and represent a victory for not-for-profits that follow the law."

Last month, a federal judge ordered Trump to pay the $2 million in damages after the foundation admitted in a settlement that the president personally misused foundation funds to help his 2016 presidential campaign, settle personal legal disputes and buyportraits of himself and sports memorabilia.

Trump ordered to pay $2M after misusing his charity in 'shocking pattern of illegality'
The $2 million will go to eight different charities: Army Emergency Relief, the Children's Aid Society, Citymeals-on-Wheels, Give an Hour, Martha’s Table, the United Negro College Fund, the United Way of National Capital Area, and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Trump also agreed to distribute the remaining $1.8 million in the foundation's coffers among those same charities.


Each charity will receive a total of $476,140.41. The settlement also called for mandatory training requirements for the now-defunct foundation's directors — Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump, which James said each has undergone.

"Funds have finally gone where they deserve — to eight credible charities. My office will continue to fight for accountability because no one is above the law — not a businessman, not a candidate for office, and not even the president of the United States," James said.
 
Last edited:
You're a sad little man.

For 40+ years Trump did business, but only after corrupt shitbags got "elected" 40+ years later was it said he did anything wrong. :rolleyes:

:bigthink:

No Feds, no state all over him for 40+ years, but now..and when he's running for office..against Democrats..91 charges in 4 indictments.

If Trump had done anything illegal, they would have found it in 2015-16. They even had him wiretapped and came up with bupkiss.

This is the lengths a corrupt government will go to, and it's disgusting. Furthermore it's the Democrat party using all the taxpayers' money to do it with, so yeah;

That's fucked up.

In NYC, it was no secret what a fucking crook both he and his dad were. You know what they had going for them? They had greater resources (money) than those they were fucking over. Just load them up with lawyers and delays and strangle them until they gave up.

Guess what, cocksucker? Now the shoe is on the other foot.

Trump was always an abuser of power. But once he got the power of the presidency, he took it to a new level. Now, tge crook has 91 felony counts and not even the resources to pay bail. The irony is great, isn’t it?
 
Biiitch! You don't know what objectivity is.

What ya think about this?


I think he was at a venue that held 5000 people that was not full, in a very Trumpper area.

I think he claimed there were tens of thousands there.

I think he knows he is a fraud.

I think we have a delusional group of Americans.
 
jarod, I try very hard to be objective about most people, including you, but stop lying. with absolutely zero real evidence, all of it circumstantial, the democrat led house impeached trump and you were cheering for it, all along.

you are either very aware of what you're doing with your partisanship and just not caring about it, or you truly believe this crap about you, which is even scarier and shows that you do not live in reality

Which impeachment are you talking about? It is okay to convict people on circumstantial evidence, it happens every day in courthouses all across America, but you only chirp up to complain when you believe it happened to Trump.

I heard the phone call with Zelinsky and I saw what was happening. You know what Trump was doing in that call also.

I heard Trump rally a crowd to go fight at the Capital for an election he clearly lost. You saw that also.
 
What do you believe Biden is guilty of? Without evidence?

I think he might be guilty of accepting bribe money, but I haven't seen the evidence of it.... I have heard the allegations and seen where he son was trading on the Biden name. I do not blame the father for the sins of an adult son.

I know my brother once wrote me a check for $25,000 a year after I had made part of a down payment for him on a house because his cash was in what we both considered a strong investment at the time.
 
It's been dangerous as fuck for ya the whole time, but you keep fuckin' around.

The patience for your bullshit is not infinite. It will run out if you keep pushing.

And Lord help ya when that happens, because I couldn't even if I wanted to, not that I even do.

Bring it on! Pussy.
 
Which impeachment are you talking about? It is okay to convict people on circumstantial evidence, it happens every day in courthouses all across America, but you only chirp up to complain when you believe it happened to Trump.
and there you go again, delusional assumptions about my so called defense of trump. are any of you leftists capable or reasonable or rational thoughts and discussions without resorting to throwing around the trumper label like you do the racist label?
 
Back
Top