Seriously? Randall Paul is more of a joke every day!

If this is supposed to be such a slam-dunk against Hillary, why didn't the repubs use it in 2008?

I think Rand Paul is desperate to keep his own name in the news.

Thing is, I'm against having Hillary for the Presidential candidate....we already had 8 years of Slick Willy, and when all is said and done, he did just as much harm as he did good. We don't need a rerun, we need a REAL PROGRESSIVE in the White House.

IMHO, of course.
 
And on that note:





Karl Rove has called into question the relevance and efficacy of using Monica Lewinsky as political ammunition to attack Hillary and Bill Clinton in the run-up to the 2016 presidential campaign -- comments that fly in the face of public statements made by RNC chairman Reince Priebus.

On the February 11 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, Fox contributor Karl Rove criticized Sen. Rand Paul's (R-KY) recent attempts to smear possible presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by bringing up her husband's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Rove observed that "beating up on Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky" and "spending a lot of time talking about the mistakes of Bill Clinton" do not constitute "a big agenda for the future of the country":


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/11/did-karl-rove-start-a-gop-civil-war-over-clinto/198015
 
And on that note:





Karl Rove has called into question the relevance and efficacy of using Monica Lewinsky as political ammunition to attack Hillary and Bill Clinton in the run-up to the 2016 presidential campaign -- comments that fly in the face of public statements made by RNC chairman Reince Priebus.

On the February 11 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, Fox contributor Karl Rove criticized Sen. Rand Paul's (R-KY) recent attempts to smear possible presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by bringing up her husband's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Rove observed that "beating up on Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky" and "spending a lot of time talking about the mistakes of Bill Clinton" do not constitute "a big agenda for the future of the country":


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/11/did-karl-rove-start-a-gop-civil-war-over-clinto/198015

I never thought I would post these words...I agree with Karl Rove
 
Thing is, I'm against having Hillary for the Presidential candidate....we already had 8 years of Slick Willy, and when all is said and done, he did just as much harm as he did good. We don't need a rerun, we need a REAL PROGRESSIVE in the White House.

IMHO, of course.

I'm not convinced she's going to run, given her serious health problems not too long ago.
 
Back
Top