SF - The Interview

Cancel7

Banned
AMY GOODMAN: Welcome to Democracy Now!

MAHER ARAR: Thank you.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, why don't you start off by describing in your own words what happened a year ago. Where were you coming from that you ended up in a New York airport?

MAHER ARAR: I was vacationing with my family and I just decided to go back to Ottawa to prepare for work, basically. I used my air miles, American Airlines air miles to buy the ticket and the only possible route at that time was to go through New York. I arrived in New York on time and I was pulled aside by immigration officials and Two police guys came and they searched my bag. They told me it’s only a routine thing and took my fingerprints, my photos and all of a sudden officials came and started interrogating me.

AMY GOODMAN: And what were they asking you?

MAHER ARAR: Most of the questions they asked, were you related to my frequent trips to the United States, which companies I visited, how much money I made, if I had any family members who live in the states, and about my relationships with other people. The second day of interrogations, they asked me a lot about my political views about Iraq, about Palestine, about Bin Laden and some other issues, too.

AMY GOODMAN: And then what happened?

MAHER ARAR: And, of course, I was very surprised. They always told me they’ll let me go and I was cooperating. But when I thought things were getting serious, I asked for a lawyer. And they told me, sorry, you are not an American citizen and you're not entitled to any lawyer. AndI said let me make a phone call to they let my family know that I being questioned and they would not let me and I asked repeatedly. So I was taken to a different building. I was implicated for another exhaustive day. They basically just arrested me. They shackled me, chained me, and took me to the M.D.C. in Brooklyn.

AMY GOODMAN: And then what happened?

MAHER ARAR: At the M.D.C., I stayed there for 13 days and then I stayed there for 13 days in military confinement and again, I asked for a lawyer and I asked to make a phone call, but they just ignored my requests. And five days later, they actually allowed me a phone call. I called my mother-in-law in Ottawa and I told her about what happened and she said she was going to find a lawyer for me. Of course, up until this point, what I was told by them is that my problem was mostly immigration problem and so the lawyer who came to see me later was an immigration lawyer. But at the M.D.C., they hand over this document to me saying that basically that I'm a member of Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization, and basically they can't allow me in the states, even though I was only going through on transit.

AMY GOODMAN: And, again, M.D.C. is the metropolitan detention center in New York city?

MAHER ARAR: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: You were then deported to Syria?

MAHER ARAR: What happened at the airport first, and after the second interrogation, one of the immigration people there, he came to see me and he told me this. He said we want you to go back to Syria voluntarily. I said no way! I said why don't you lets me go to Canada? He said to me you are special interest. That's when they took me to M.D.C., basically. They kind of forced me to apply for a visa and they took me to prison. In prison, I spent 13 days. Just two days -- Four days before they deported me, they brought me a document saying that saying that the INS director had decided to deport me and I had a right designate a country to where I would be deported. I wrote ‘Canada’ and the second question was if I had any concerns that I'd like sent back to Canada and I chose ‘no’ and signed the document. On a Sunday, two days before I was deported, they held a six-hour exhaustive meeting and they asked me questions regarding why I did not want to go back to Syria. So, I explained to them very clearly that if they send me back to Syria, I will be tortured. They accused me of being a member of a terrorist organization and I told them repeatedly that I am not a member of this group and they were just not believing me and I said if you send me back to Syria, the Syrians will try to extract information and the only way to do that is just to torture me.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain, by the way, we are talking to Mara ERRAR, a Canadian citizen, who was in transit through the United States after family holiday. New York authorities at the New York airport where he was heading through to Canada took him and then deported him to Syria. Can you explain why you though you would be tortured in Syria?

MAHER ARAR: Basically, the Americans accused me of being a member of terrorist organization, which was not true and I knew from my parents that Syrians used torture with the prisoners. It's very common place in Syria and so I just raised this concern. I said, listen, when I arrive there and the Syrians will ask me questions, if I am going to tell them the truth, but most likely they'll not believe me.- You know, I am being send by a country, by a respected country like the United States to another country, which uses torture and they were going to say to me, well, we don't believe you. If you are innocent, why did the United States send you here? So, it was a very natural reaction from me.

AMY GOODMAN: How long did you live in Syria? You were born there.

MAHER ARAR: I left Syria when I was 17 years old. So, I never came back there, except, of course, when I was deported against my will. I was 17 years old when I left the country.

AMY GOODMAN: And why did you leave?

MAHER ARAR: Why I left the country?

AMY GOODMAN: Yes.

MAHER ARAR: Well, basically in the early 1980's, most of my brothers migrated to Canada and my parents and I stayed behind and in 1987, my brother sponsored us. Life here was better and my brothers got the jobs at that time and so they sent us letters and said why don't you come live with us here? They wanted to take care of my parents. That was the reason. My family and I, we did not have any political or religious associations and we still don't have any.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you then describe when you returned exactly what happened to you, Maher Arar, when you arrived in Syria?

MAHER ARAR: When I arrived in Syria, of course they took me on a private jet to Jordan where I spent an hour. Then I was sent to Syria. I arrived over there. There were three people waiting for me. They just started questioning me. The first day, it was only routine questions about my family, why I left the country, why did I go back for a visit, the names of my brothers, their wives, and whether there were religious people or not. I mean, really when I arrived there, I just couldn't believe it. I fell at first it was a dream. I was crying all time. I was disoriented. I wished I had something in my hand to kill myself because I knew I was going to be tortured and this was my preoccupation. That's all I thinking about when I was on the plane. I arrived there. I was crying all time.

One of them started questioning me and the others were taking notes. The first day it was mainly routine questions between eight and twelve us and the second day is when the beatings started. The first day they did not find anything strange about what I told them and they started to beat me with a cable and they would beat me for three, four times. They would stop again and they would ask questions again and they always kept telling me, you are a liar and things like that. So, the beating continued for the first two weeks.

The most intensive beating was really the first week and then after that, it was mostly slapping on the face and hitting. So, on the third day when they didn't find anything, third or fourth day either, In my view, they just wanted to please the Americans and they had to find something on me because I was accused of being an Al Qaeda member, which is nowadays synonymous with Afghanistan. They told me you've been to a training camp in Afghanistan. I said no. And they started beating me. And I said, well, I had no choice. I just wanted the beating to stop. I said, of course, I've been to Afghanistan. I was ready to confess to anything just to stop the torture.

AMY GOODMAN: We have to break for 60 seconds.- We'll come back with you then. Maher Arar detained by U.S. officials as he was traveling through the United States airport trying to get back home to Canada, deported secretly to Syria and describing his ordeal in a Syrian prison. We'll be right back with him in a minute.

AMY GOODMAN: You are listening to Democracy Now!: The War and Peace Report as we return to the man detained by U.S. officials last year during a stopover at New York airport, repeatedly tortured after he was secretly deported by the United States to Syria where he had lived until he was 17 years old, lived in Canada for about 15 years where he was married and has as family.

So, you described your first days in the prison. You then said that you told them, after they asked you whether You'd been to Afghanistan to stop the torture, you said yes, and then what happened?

MAHER ARAR: After I told them this, the beatings started to become less and less severe and the interrogation actually ended after two weeks and the worst of all of this is the cell that they put me in. It was an underground cell. It was dark there. There was no light in there. It was three feet wide, six feet deep and seven feet high with an opening in the ceiling and that's where a little bit of light came in. There was no heating in the winter. There was only two blankets on the floor, the hard floor. [sighing] It's a disgusting place to be. There were rats. Cats above the cell and the cats peed from time to time in that opening. There was no hot water, especially no toilets. So basically just to describe it in two words, it was a torture chamber. And I stayed in that place for 10 months and 10 days before I was transferred to a better place.

2nd 1/2 of interview: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/07/1512227&mode=thread&tid=25
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/19/AR2006091901547.html

That's a "mainstream" story about him. There are a couple of important things to remember. It happened. It was never, and to this day has not been, denied by our government. The Canadian government was incompetent and perhaps complicit at some level of it, in the beginning. The only reason he is alive is because the Canadian government, as it moved up the ladder, freaked, and started shaking cages and demanding his release. He is completely innocent (my personal opinion is that it doesn't matter this is not what the United States does, innocent or guilty, but to some it does matter, and I have to admit it makes it all the more horrifying that he is completely innocent), and was tortured, and if he were not a Canadian citizen, he'd be dead.

If you google him you'll see it's been a big story.
 
I'm so glad you're reading about it! That's cool that you're doing that.

I will definitely look at the NY'er piece on this. Thanks.
 
I don't get the indifference people have to stories like this. Its like we are becoming monsters who have little regard for humanity.

I guess I'll continue my boycott of Syria.
 
I don't get the indifference people have to stories like this. Its like we are becoming monsters who have little regard for humanity.

I guess I'll continue my boycott of Syria.
It's one of the oldest stories in politics: people never think that it can happen to them or anyone they know until it's too late. And the government sells it by claiming they're making you safe from the bogeymen. We're only doing it for your own good!
 
Yep ornot, while at the same time won't even give out the visitors log for the WH....
And they said Noxon was paranoid. Not sure he could hold a candle to the neos.
 
The sad thing is people will consider the loss of this man's dignity and his suffering nothing more than collateral damage in the "War on Terror" and necessary to prevent hollywoodian fantasies of terror attacks: what if he knew were a dirty bomb was going to go off in 15 minutes..........??? Then would it be okay?
 
Last edited:
The sad thing is people will consider the loss of this man's dignity and his suffering nothing more than collaterol damage in the "War on Terror" and necessary to prevent hollywoodian fantasies of terror attacks: what if he knew were a dirty bomb was going to go off in 15 minutes..........??? Then would be okay?
Which is, I think, exactly why the administration leapt on the stupid "War on Terror" metaphor in the first place. War is hell, as they say: people are more accepting of "collateral damage" in a war.

I keep saying that the War on Terror label is stupid. I shouldn't because it's anything but. It's coldly calculated to give the administration as much leeway as it can get in curtailing individual rights.

Ironically, I'll bet that this is one of the few things AssCap and I can agree on. I think I need a shower. :shock:
 
The sad thing is people will consider the loss of this man's dignity and his suffering nothing more than collaterol damage in the "War on Terror" and necessary to prevent hollywoodian fantasies of terror attacks: what if he knew were a dirty bomb was going to go off in 15 minutes..........??? Then would be okay?

Right, exactly. I think they must be missing some basic component. Empathy I would think.
 
Which is, I think, exactly why the administration leapt on the stupid "War on Terror" metaphor in the first place. War is hell, as they say: people are more accepting of "collateral damage" in a war.

I keep saying that the War on Terror label is stupid. I shouldn't because it's anything but. It's coldly calculated to give the administration as much leeway as it can get in curtailing individual rights.

Ironically, I'll bet that this is one of the few things AssCap and I can agree on. I think I need a shower. :shock:

I don't know - AHZ doesn't like Muslims much better than he likes Jews.
 
Which is, I think, exactly why the administration leapt on the stupid "War on Terror" metaphor in the first place. War is hell, as they say: people are more accepting of "collateral damage" in a war.

I keep saying that the War on Terror label is stupid. I shouldn't because it's anything but. It's coldly calculated to give the administration as much leeway as it can get in curtailing individual rights.

Ironically, I'll bet that this is one of the few things AssCap and I can agree on. I think I need a shower. :shock:

I agree. We should be focused on information gathering and security. Not this misnomered (is that a word?) "War on Terror". It just feeds into the sheep mentality that we need to be fighting militarily somewhere when that's not what will keep us secured. 6 effin years later and our ports are still unsecured.
 
From the last paragraph of page nine of the New Yorker Article...

"John Radsan, the former C.I.A. lawyer, offered a reply of sorts. “As a society, we haven’t figured out what the rough rules are yet,” he said. “There are hardly any rules for illegal enemy combatants. It’s the law of the jungle. And right now we happen to be the strongest animal.” "

Ok... now from everything I have read, there is virtually no response from the US Government and they have had ample time to put out a response. In the case of Arar, we thus have no choice but to accept the fact that his story is true. I would have liked to have found something other than his own testimony to verify what the conditions were like and what methods were used, but I could not find any.

I suppose my skepticism comes from the fact that Al Queda trains its operatives to say they were tortured when captured... because they know it will send the human rights groups into a frenzy and make us look bad (which it should if it is really occuring).

From the New Yorker article, it appears as though the process has been loosened too much from the mid 90's. It used to be that they would only render those that had either US warrants out for their arrest or international warrants, including those convicted in absentia. Again, it appears from the limited information that Arar should not have been sent anywhere other than back to Canada. I don't have a problem with him being questioned by US authorities, but everything thereafter certainly seems wrong.

But there is no way I believe a company like Jeppesen should be held responsible for the actions of the CIA. Perhaps I am biased as I live and work within 5 miles of Jeppesen and several of their employees are my clients... but still, to hold them responsible for the actions of the CIA seems an extraordinary reach.
 
Back
Top