She's Either Lying or she's one Dumb Bitch ... your choice

Our laws only apply to Presidential candidates?

That is what leftists claimed when she lost. So I would presume so.

Ask Jarod

Just to be clear. Are you now saying that Hillary broke the law and should be prosecuted? Do you want Ivanka prosecuted?

Tell ya what. I am fine with Ivanka doing jail time if you agree to Hillary doing jail time as well. Deal?

Are you willing to admit Hillary broke the law and should have been punished?
 
That is what leftists claimed when she lost. So I would presume so.

Ask Jarod

Just to be clear. Are you now saying that Hillary broke the law and should be prosecuted? Do you want Ivanka prosecuted?

Tell ya what. I am fine with Ivanka doing jail time if you agree to Hillary doing jail time as well. Deal?

Are you willing to admit Hillary broke the law and should have been punished?

Deal, git-r-done pard. Lock them up.
 
Ivanka is the offspring of a diseased orangutan.
It's unfair to expect intelligent behavior from a pathetic broad like that.

We need to keep our eyes on the real task at hand.
What shall we do with the 63,000,000 trumpanzees polluting our republic?
 
Ivanka is the offspring of a diseased orangutan.
It's unfair to expect intelligent behavior from a pathetic broad like that.

We need to keep our eyes on the real task at hand.
What shall we do with the 63,000,000 trumpanzees polluting our republic?


Maybe MBS will arrange Turkish Style Meeting with All of them.

America First ... so ... it's really Ok.
 
Ivanka is the offspring of a diseased orangutan.
It's unfair to expect intelligent behavior from a pathetic broad like that.

We need to keep our eyes on the real task at hand.
What shall we do with the 63,000,000 trumpanzees polluting our republic?

She's smarter than you fuckstick.
 
this thread and many like it demonstrate the willful ignorance of the democrats in 2016 and now, completely unfamiliar with the arguments being made or even the circumstances.

hillary stole classifiedsgovernment information off of private internal government servers. she put it on her own server in her own house, and when people found out she tried destroying the evidence by smashing the hard drives with hammers and pretending she thought "wiping" a drive was physically cleaning it "like with a cloth?"

these emails had top secret stuff and the server itself not being very secure ended up being hacked by china and probably even those spooky russians.

hilary did all this, on purpose and with full knowledge, to cover up her crimes, shady business dealings, bribery, extortion, and to avoid FOIA requests

ivanka used a gmail (or w/e) account. the emails themselves were ironically much more secure, the emails themselves hosted on googles servers could be subpoenaed anytime. she did not have physical control over them, and she wasn't using it to discuss classified information or to store top secret documents, and she didn't try to destroy the information when people found out, she in fact switched off of it before even being told to do so.

what Hilary did was against the law.

it's really not that hard to understand.
 
this thread and many like it demonstrate the willful ignorance of the democrats in 2016 and now, completely unfamiliar with the arguments being made or even the circumstances.

hillary stole classifiedsgovernment information off of private internal government servers. she put it on her own server in her own house, and when people found out she tried destroying the evidence by smashing the hard drives with hammers and pretending she thought "wiping" a drive was physically cleaning it "like with a cloth?"

these emails had top secret stuff and the server itself not being very secure ended up being hacked by china and probably even those spooky russians.

hilary did all this, on purpose and with full knowledge, to cover up her crimes, shady business dealings, bribery, extortion, and to avoid FOIA requests

ivanka used a gmail (or w/e) account. the emails themselves were ironically much more secure, the emails themselves hosted on googles servers could be subpoenaed anytime. she did not have physical control over them, and she wasn't using it to discuss classified information or to store top secret documents, and she didn't try to destroy the information when people found out, she in fact switched off of it before even being told to do so.

what Hilary did was against the law.

it's really not that hard to understand.

Hillary didn't "steal" anything and neither did Ivanka... and Ivanka was conducting government business via unsecured emails.
 
Hillary didn't "steal" anything and neither did Ivanka... and Ivanka was conducting government business via unsecured emails.

the only way to get the highly sensative government data (that is never supposed to leave the state departments internal network) is to steal it. which is what she did.

gmail or whatever she used was literally more secure than the setup Hillary had.
 
the only way to get the highly sensative government data (that is never supposed to leave the state departments internal network) is to steal it. which is what she did.

gmail or whatever she used was literally more secure than the setup Hillary had.

You are an idiot... and that 's not how sensitive is spelled. Neither woman stole anything..
 
The difference between the TWO (2) ...

One was INVESTIGATED ...
One TESTIFIED
One was CLEARED

Next Excuse Please
:cool:
 
Back
Top