Should abnormal people (e.x. homosexuals, transgenders) be segregated?

M

MarcusA

Verified User
It is generous for any nation to allow what evolution, left to its own devices would not.

That said, would it be in our best interest to segregate abnormal people, such as homosexuals and so-called "transgender people" and require them to live in segregated parts of the country away from normal people or white people?

My first thought would be appropriate areas of the country where poor and less educated demographics (e.x. non-whites such as blacks and Hispanics, or demographics which are statistically minority) are less common (e.x. low-rent apartments or low-income trailer areas are place where white people are less common in percentages compared to non whites) - this would be less expensive than appropriating housing districts, and would help to prevent such abnormal individuals from disturbing the existence of normal people and the natural majorities, whether in the contexts of housing, businesses, education. churches, universities, and so on; as well as said law enforcement; since it would allow the police to profile different eras of the state, city, or country on the basis of demographics and crime rates, and prevent majority interests from being lumped into the same boat as minority ones.
 
MarcusA said:
It is generous for any nation to allow what evolution, left to its own devices would not.

That said, would it be in our best interest to segregate abnormal people, such as homosexuals and so-called "transgender people" and require them to live in segregated parts of the country away from normal people or white people?

My first thought would be appropriate areas of the country where poor and less educated demographics (e.x. non-whites such as blacks and Hispanics, or demographics which are statistically minority) are less common (e.x. low-rent apartments or low-income trailer areas are place where white people are less common in percentages compared to non whites) - this would be less expensive than appropriating housing districts, and would help to prevent such abnormal individuals from disturbing the existence of normal people and the natural majorities, whether in the contexts of housing, businesses, education. churches, universities, and so on; as well as said law enforcement; since it would allow the police to profile different eras of the state, city, or country on the basis of demographics and crime rates.
Click to expand...

You should be segregated from normal people in a fucking looney bin.

This is your lamest sock ever, Owl.
 
countryboy said:
You should be segregated from normal people in a fucking looney bin.
Click to expand...
Yada yada yada

The reality is that if said "groups" "separate themselves" from society as a whole and identify with their own non-legally recognized "tribe" over state, nation and so forth, this WOULD be the logical conclusion.

So no, I see it as no different than granting sovereign nations to Native Americans; we could simply have a similar national policy for abnormal individuals like homosexuals and transgenders and let them exist in their own "little tribe' rather than in the context of the majority and the normal members of society.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Agreed. At least castration a vasectomy to make sure he can't breed more idiots.
Click to expand...
I'm a MENSA level intellect in the top 1% of linguistic ability; if I "bred" kids they would be quite well-endowed mentally, so naturally the state could very well subsidize my existence and progeny who naturally contribute more to society by virtue of our eliteness, at the expense of less fit ones who naturally contribute less.
 
MarcusA said:
I'm a MENSA level intellect in the top 1% of linguistic ability; if I "bred" kids they would be quite well-endowed mentally, so naturally the state could very well subsidize my existence and progeny who naturally contribute more to society by virtue of our eliteness, at the expense of less fit ones who naturally contribute less.
Click to expand...

Doubtful. If that were true, it'd be self-evident in your posts. It's possible for a smart person to successfully imitate a complete dumbass but it's impossible for a complete dumbass to successfully imitate a smart person. You're a dumbass, Marcus.

48a7hv.jpg
 
I'd also be tempted to include atheists; since they're likely to get offended over the legal public and private sponsorship of federal holidays like Christmas, it would make sense to separate them from normal people as well.

Not to mention, that atheists cannot believe it is "wrong" to rape or molest children, so by that reason alone, all atheists should be on a government watchlist, like NAMBLA and other ne'er do wells).
 
MarcusA said:
It is generous for any nation to allow what evolution, left to its own devices would not.

That said, would it be in our best interest to segregate abnormal people, such as homosexuals and so-called "transgender people" and require them to live in segregated parts of the country away from normal people or white people?

My first thought would be appropriate areas of the country where poor and less educated demographics (e.x. non-whites such as blacks and Hispanics, or demographics which are statistically minority) are less common (e.x. low-rent apartments or low-income trailer areas are place where white people are less common in percentages compared to non whites) - this would be less expensive than appropriating housing districts, and would help to prevent such abnormal individuals from disturbing the existence of normal people and the natural majorities, whether in the contexts of housing, businesses, education. churches, universities, and so on; as well as said law enforcement; since it would allow the police to profile different eras of the state, city, or country on the basis of demographics and crime rates, and prevent majority interests from being lumped into the same boat as minority ones.
Click to expand...

You're a major asshole.
 
MarcusA said:
I'd also be tempted to include atheists; since they're likely to get offended over the legal public and private sponsorship of federal holidays like Christmas, it would make sense to separate them from normal people as well.

Not to mention, that atheists cannot believe it is "wrong" to rape or molest children, so by that reason alone, all atheists should be on a government watchlist, like NAMBLA and other ne'er do wells).
Click to expand...

in the name of jesus christ I command Thee, demon, to reveal your name!
 
MarcusA said:
Yada yada yada

The reality is that if said "groups" "separate themselves" from society as a whole and identify with their own non-legally recognized "tribe" over state, nation and so forth, this WOULD be the logical conclusion.

So no, I see it as no different than granting sovereign nations to Native Americans; we could simply have a similar national policy for abnormal individuals like homosexuals and transgenders and let them exist in their own "little tribe' rather than in the context of the majority and the normal members of society.
Click to expand...

:eyeroll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top