Should abnormal people (e.x. homosexuals, transgenders) be segregated?

MarcusA said:
It is generous for any nation to allow what evolution, left to its own devices would not.

That said, would it be in our best interest to segregate abnormal people, such as homosexuals and so-called "transgender people" and require them to live in segregated parts of the country away from normal people or white people?

My first thought would be appropriate areas of the country where poor and less educated demographics (e.x. non-whites such as blacks and Hispanics, or demographics which are statistically minority) are less common (e.x. low-rent apartments or low-income trailer areas are place where white people are less common in percentages compared to non whites) - this would be less expensive than appropriating housing districts, and would help to prevent such abnormal individuals from disturbing the existence of normal people and the natural majorities, whether in the contexts of housing, businesses, education. churches, universities, and so on; as well as said law enforcement; since it would allow the police to profile different eras of the state, city, or country on the basis of demographics and crime rates, and prevent majority interests from being lumped into the same boat as minority ones.
Click to expand...

No.
 
MarcusA said:
I'd also be tempted to include atheists; since they're likely to get offended over the legal public and private sponsorship of federal holidays like Christmas, it would make sense to separate them from normal people as well.

Not to mention, that atheists cannot believe it is "wrong" to rape or molest children, so by that reason alone, all atheists should be on a government watchlist, like NAMBLA and other ne'er do wells).
Click to expand...

How do you plan to shred the Constitution in order to make this happen?




48a8rk.jpg
 
Why are people involved in this guy's discussions? He's 100% troll and is playing both sides. He is literally just taken the most sensitive topics on both sides and making the biggest asshole blanket statements he can. It's no legitimate thought, just bait. These are the type of trolls you just outright ignore. Their only purpose is to piss people off for shits and giggles. This one is a lot more convoluted than Texty and is obviously on a more intelligent scale. Unlike other trolls here, a troll with no stake in the game besides bugging people has a leg up on anyone that does have a stake. They can work around you and need to be ignored.
 
Coffiend said:
Why are people involved in this guy's discussions? He's 100% troll and is playing both sides. He is literally just taken the most sensitive topics on both sides and making the biggest asshole blanket statements he can. It's no legitimate thought, just bait. These are the type of trolls you just outright ignore. Their only purpose is to piss people off for shits and giggles. This one is a lot more convoluted than Texty and is obviously on a more intelligent scale. Unlike other trolls here, a troll with no stake in the game besides bugging people has a leg up on anyone that does have a stake. They can work around you and need to be ignored.
Click to expand...

Agreed, but trolls can be fun to play with. Notice how quickly Marcus ran away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top