Into the Night
Verified User
So you want to continue this deviation from the topic of the thread.
I never said the Supreme Court has no authority. I said they no authority over the Constitution.at this point the conversation is on the power the courts have within the balance of powers. You continue to say they have "no authority" but it doesn't work that way.
Never said any differently, but YOU are trying to place the Supreme Court OVER the Constitution.Of course the courts have authority to rule on whether a law or action of the government is within the authority enumerated to that branch per the constitution.
You did, by inference.Nobody said they had "authority over" the constitution but you,
No. It was YOUR argument.and that my friend is a very standard and obvious strawman argument.
Rights do not come from a piece of paper.Each of the branch has authority and each balances the other so that no one branch can breach our rights.
Yet you claimed the Supreme Court can override the States authority.Do you know who has authority "over" the constitution? The States do, they created the Federal government with that contractual agreement we call the Constitution, and those states have the ability to amend that constitution even without the say or request of any of the three branches or anyone in the Federal government....
Not anymore. Schools have become indoctrination centers in most cases, and try to subvert and cancel the Constitution.Anyway, at some point, usually around 9th grade when I was in school, you get social studies and learn what the balance of powers is,
That it would.and what the courts can do, what the executive can do, what the legislature can do... None of them have "Power over the constitution" but all of them have certain authority granted them by the constitution... If they didn't Amendment 10 would be a bit useless.
Now, let's return to the original subject: Why do you think revoking a visa because of waving flags and supporting Hamas is violating the Constitution?