Shouldn't we be at full employment by now?

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Seems like all willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger parrots, you AVOID the information I provide in favor of squawking tired, long disproved distortions, lies, half truths and mantras touted by the likes of Hannity Limbaugh, Krauthhammer and the WND.

Let's show the people what you're avoiding:


http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...55#post1424755

So unless you can actually and honestly discuss the points in the article using documented FACTS and not the drivel derived from your mental flatulence, I won't waste further time responding to you.

I said he inherited a recession you dumb fuck. You are talking about surpluses? You seriously don't know the difference? No wonder you vote for the democrat party. They love em stupid as fuck. And you sure fit the bill

You keep blathering, yet you say nothing new....you keep AVOIDING the FACTS that make your blathering pointless, because the basis of your blatherings are WRONG.

See, the thing is YOU don't understand the economics...just the headlines Limbaugh balks. Here, for your education:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7089700/ns/business-answer_desk/#.UuQWespOlkg

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/


tell me something, toodles...are you going to waste time moving the goalposts and repeating EVERY failed and disproved neocon/teabagger mantra and talking point for the last 13 years?
 
You keep blathering, yet you say nothing new....you keep AVOIDING the FACTS that make your blathering pointless, because the basis of your blatherings are WRONG.

See, the thing is YOU don't understand the economics...just the headlines Limbaugh balks. Here, for your education:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7089700/ns/business-answer_desk/#.UuQWespOlkg

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/

I don't understand economics? The pussy lips who doesn't know the difference between a recession and a government surplus says I don't understand economics? That's rich.

That is why you will remain poor and I will continue to laugh at you.

BTW thought you weren't going to waste any more time. Did you lie?
 
Seriously someone who doesn't know the difference between a surplus and a recession is hardly in any position to comment on someone else's mental acuity.

Maybe Winterborn will come along and correct you? Or maybe not.

Do promise not to respond? It will save me the trouble of thread banning your ass

So now you what, try to bolster your confidence with adding on to your already erroneous rantings? Here's how I pablum feed willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger parrots like yourself:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-full-employment-by-now&p=1425561#post1425561
 
Seems like tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber (aka I love America and Truth Detector) are taking turns trying to help each other out....pity neither have the brains, honesty or courage to actually debate the points put forth...let alone use ALL the facts pertaining to a discussion. oh well, I'll leave them to scramble for some type of retort that will make them feel good for now.
 
Seems like tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber (aka I love America and Truth Detector) are taking turns trying to help each other out....pity neither have the brains, honesty or courage to actually debate the points put forth...let alone use ALL the facts pertaining to a discussion. oh well, I'll leave them to scramble for some type of retort that will make them feel good for now.

Come back when you learn the difference between a recession and a surplus. This is why you will remain poor and envious of others. I will pray for you
 
Actually, the Shrub inherited a SURPLUS from Slick Willy....something he threw away on two war actions (one that was BASED ON LIES AND DECEIT TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC) that he DID NOT PUT ON THE OFFICIAL BUDGET, which subsequently greatly contributed to the crash in 2000. Look it up, bunky.

Damn dunce; you just pegged my bullshit meter. Please show me a war that was fought with a surplus and that was budgeted. These comments are so incredibly stupid, I don’t know how someone can parrot them and not think they sound like an idiot.

Bush DID indeed inherit a recession from slick willy. One might argue that he also inherited 9-11 because slick willy was too busy getting blow jobs to notice what was happening in the ME and refused to take out Osama when he had the chance for fear of negative public opinion.

You see, Democrats are BIG on weighing their options with public opinion and not acting in the best interests of the country.

That surplus was there in case things like the Dot.com bubble burst, don't cha know.

Really dunce? So Big Slick Willy phoned you and said; “Taich, the surplus that Republicans forced me to have against my wishes is planned so that when the dot.com bubble happens, they can pay for it.”

God you are one dumb gullible leftist lying buffoon.

so now that yet another goal post move by you has been canned, lets' look again at what you so desperately avoid:

This is funny; a leftist desperately wallowing in a never ending circle of stupidity claiming others are moving goal posts. Dude, you have to be getting dizzy with all these yarns you keep spinning.

Seems you're not as long winded as your compadre the (bogus) Truth Detector, but your just as willfully ignorant.

This is the definition of irony; a dishonest buffoon who mindlessly parrots talking points in a vacuum of the truth or facts claiming OTHERS don’t know the truth.

Of course you are MORE than welcome to PROVE anything I claim here as a fact is NOT a fact anytime. I won’t hold my breath; everyone knows you just make your bullshit up as you go.

They should shorten the dictionary meaning of stupid and just put your name there.

Damn you’re one dumb dishonest leftist hack.

I want to end this post on a final note to Liberal stupidity and hypocrisy; isn't ironic that Liberals who ranted like a bunch of brain dead lunatics about Bush's $465 billion deficits are now silent when their dunce runs it into the trillions for four straight years. You just cannot make up that kind of irony or hypocritical buffoonery.
 
Seems like tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber (aka I love America and Truth Detector) are taking turns trying to help each other out....pity neither have the brains, honesty or courage to actually debate the points put forth...let alone use ALL the facts pertaining to a discussion. oh well, I'll leave them to scramble for some type of retort that will make them feel good for now.

LMAO
 
Did some analysis of the charts today and SPY crossed its 9, 20, and 50 day moving averages. Hasn't crossed 100 or 200 day MA yet and haven't seen a death cross which is good.

Monday will be an interesting day. If SPY closes below 1800 again. I am going short with stop loss at 1820 in case this is another false signal.

1775 is next support level to watch
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
For starters, it was the Shrub's tax cuts that favored the rich, bunky. Here's a primer for your education:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...073002671.html

Now, all YOU have to do is show me where Obama voted in favor of any reaganomic tax cuts while he was a senator. I'll wait.

Dear shit-for-brains; the Bush tax cuts were across the board. They weren't "targeted for the rich" and I challenge you to find the elements of the law that did this.

But you can't; you're an ignorant hyper partisan retard stuck permanently on stupid.

"reaganomic tax cuts"? This is proof that you merely rant ignorant like a trained little circus monkey parroting talking points you have been fed instead of thinking for yourself.

That is not an economic mandate either you ignorant dunce.

Obama, as a Senator voted FOR the bank bailouts.

How the Senate voted Wednesday on the financial bailout bill (S. Amdt. 5685 to H.R. 1424):

Obama (D-IL), Yea


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14196.html


I asked either you or your equally dishonest buddy to show me where senator Obama voted for any reaganomic TAX CUTS that was claimed by you dullards.

NOT the bank bailouts, you simpleton. Learn to read.

Oh, and I've supplied documentation to what I refer to yesterday.....but I doubt you have the intellectual courage and honesty to READ it and then debate the facts. So carry on spewing your mantras and dodging any issue that doesn't fit them.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
And since Wall St. has done NOTHING to alleviate the unemployment situation in this country, your little ditty here means NOTHING with regards to the subject title of this thread.

Wait Obama says it is fixed. Are you saying it isn't? Look I am just looking for profit opportunities and sharing investment ideas with Topspin. The rest of this is irrelevant to me anymore. I am not interested in playing big Indian little Indian. You will defend Obummer until the very end because to do so would damage your fragile psyche.

You seem hell bent on spewing these half assed distortions, half truths and out right lies instead of honestly debating what people put in front of you. I would call you fucking stupid, but that would indicate that you are at least intellectually honest...and the chronology of the posts shows you're anything but. I hope moving that goal post doesn't hurt your back, because you sure do blather on for someone claiming not to be interested in the thread. Carry on.
 
I asked either you or your equally dishonest buddy to show me where senator Obama voted for any reaganomic TAX CUTS that was claimed by you dullards.

NOT the bank bailouts, you simpleton. Learn to read.

Oh, and I've supplied documentation to what I refer to yesterday.....but I doubt you have the intellectual courage and honesty to READ it and then debate the facts. So carry on spewing your mantras and dodging any issue that doesn't fit them.

Obama couldn't have voted for the tax cuts. But he did extend them twice didn't he?

Now during the Bush years the left (you) screamed far and wide that Bush's tax cuts were ONLY for the rich. When Chairman Maobama extended them then all of a sudden they were middle class tax payers he was looking out for. You don't see the dishonesty there?
 
You seem hell bent on spewing these half assed distortions, half truths and out right lies instead of honestly debating what people put in front of you. I would call you fucking stupid, but that would indicate that you are at least intellectually honest...and the chronology of the posts shows you're anything but. I hope moving that goal post doesn't hurt your back, because you sure do blather on for someone claiming not to be interested in the thread. Carry on.

Wall St is not in it for creating jobs. They are looking for profit. As am I. If jobs are created, fine. If not? That is fine too.

You are the one who says he is finished with the thread then keeps coming back. Don't worry. I understand. You aren't the first liberal that couldn't quit me.
 
Seems like all willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger parrots, you AVOID the information I provide in favor of squawking tired, long disproved distortions, lies, half truths and mantras touted by the likes of Hannity Limbaugh, Krauthhammer and the WND.

Let's show the people what you're avoiding:


http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-full-employment-by-now&p=1424755#post1424755

So unless you can actually and honestly discuss the points in the article using documented FACTS and not the drivel derived from your mental flatulence, I won't waste further time responding to you.

Dear repugnant liar; First, please learn to use the reply with quote function; Secondly, Here was what I typed: Dear dunce; what was this mythical economic mandate the lying dunce Obama inherited that he wasn't a party to as a junior Senator from IL?

I didn't claim he voted for Reaganesque tax cuts you dishonest moron; I asked what this mythical economic mandate he inherited was.

Then all we get from a brain dead twit like you is a never ending tirade of strawman arguments.

You're typical of the empty headed Liberal morons that infest this forum with your blatantly dishonest stupidity.

Now when you can tell me what this mythical economic mandate Obama inherited, maybe we can figure out what the fuck you are trying to insinuate. But until you can utter something more coherent and truthful instead of the same moronic teaparty Rush Limbaugh canard, your whiney dishonest bloviating is just that, whiney dishonest bloviating.

You’re a moron of epic proportions who has already gotten much more attention than such moronic rants deserve; try to be honest for once in your pathetic life.
 
Come back when you learn the difference between a recession and a surplus. This is why you will remain poor and envious of others. I will pray for you

As the chronology of the posts shows, I already schooled you on this http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-full-employment-by-now&p=1425561#post1425561

So either you're just a stubborn liar by not reading the information supplied, or truly suffering from intellectual impotence and are unable to understand what you are reading. You come off like some religious zealot who closed his ears and eyes to anything outside of your propagandist bible. So be it.... I'll let you have the last predictable parrot squawk.
 
Dear repugnant liar; First, please learn to use the reply with quote function; Secondly, Here was what I typed: Dear dunce; what was this mythical economic mandate the lying dunce Obama inherited that he wasn't a party to as a junior Senator from IL?

I didn't claim he voted for Reaganesque tax cuts you dishonest moron; I asked what this mythical economic mandate he inherited was.

Then all we get from a brain dead twit like you is a never ending tirade of strawman arguments.

You're typical of the empty headed Liberal morons that infest this forum with your blatantly dishonest stupidity.

Now when you can tell me what this mythical economic mandate Obama inherited, maybe we can figure out what the fuck you are trying to insinuate. But until you can utter something more coherent and truthful instead of the same moronic teaparty Rush Limbaugh canard, your whiney dishonest bloviating is just that, whiney dishonest bloviating.

You’re a moron of epic proportions who has already gotten much more attention than such moronic rants deserve; try to be honest for once in your pathetic life.

You're not too bright, are ya bunky? See, you might be able to get away with LYING about what has transpired if this exchanger were purely oral. But it's not, IT'S A WRITTEN EXCHANGE. And all one has to do is check the chronology of the posts to see how YOU LIE by OMITTING parts of post that you don't like or cannot refute/disprove. So, for the objective reader interested in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-full-employment-by-now&p=1425546#post1425546

I'm tired of your intellectual impotence and dishonesty, which belies your screen name. Essentially you're just a lame copy of the dreck spewed on the radio by the likes of Limbaugh or Levine or Hannity or Crowley. Your buddy couldn't deal with the answers to his subject title question on this thread....neither can you. So unless you can come up with something new besides the lies, dodges and distortions you've already tried, I'd say we're done here.
 
I'm tired of your intellectual impotence and dishonesty, which belies your screen name. Essentially you're just a lame copy of the dreck spewed on the radio by the likes of Limbaugh or Levine or Hannity or Crowley. Your buddy couldn't deal with the answers to his subject title question on this thread....neither can you. So unless you can come up with something new besides the lies, dodges and distortions you've already tried, I'd say we're done here.

This is your brain on stupid; don't do stupid.

Class Dismissed Dunce; you're now free to run about the playground denouncing anyone who disagrees with your moronic screed.
 
Obama couldn't have voted for the tax cuts. But he did extend them twice didn't he?

So you and the other neocon numbskull were WRONG! And he extended them under the THREAT by the GOP majority in Congress to walk out on the job.....look it up and stop pulling this crap out of Limbaugh's ass.

Now during the Bush years the left (you) screamed far and wide that Bush's tax cuts were ONLY for the rich. When Chairman Maobama extended them then all of a sudden they were middle class tax payers he was looking out for. You don't see the dishonesty there?

Wrong again, as I've documented a few times in previous posts. I swear, you are dumb to think just repeating lies and disproved talking points will bolster your BS. So unless you've got a new tactic, I'd say we're done.
 
Wrong again, as I've documented a few times in previous posts. I swear, you are dumb to think just repeating lies and disproved talking points will bolster your BS. So unless you've got a new tactic, I'd say we're done.

What facts are those shit-for-brains; how Republicans are pissed that slavery ended?

Dunce.
 
As the chronology of the posts shows, the stalwart neocon/teabagger dimwits who defend the insinuation of the subject title of this thread are at a lost when confronted with FACTS that contradict their beliefs. So instead of dealing with ALL the information available to at least rationally discuss the issue, they just lie and deny...then try to change the subject or "move the goal post", as it were.

But here's a little ditty that puts an end to their foolishness; When Obama came into office, the GOP wailed and railed that if he DID NOT extend the Shrub's tax cuts, economic calamity would end the country. Under threat of government shut down (which the little SOB's did anyway later on), they pushed this in the media through their punditry. Well, Obama compromised and EXTENDED FOR 2 YEARS the Shrub's tax cuts.....and guess what? NO MAJOR JOB INCREASE as a result!!! But in true neocon/teabagger fashion, the neocon/teabagger GOP and it's punditry/supporters don't take responsibility for their failed policies...they blame Obama for giving them what they wanted!!

Yep, that insane type of "logic" is what tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber here are trying to convince everyone is rational....small wonder why the GOP is sweating bullets over the upcoming elections while STILL maintaining their obstructionist/stone walling stance against the Obama administration.


And the band played on.
 
Back
Top