Sick Gun Grabbers want all gun owners insured

Why's that a bad idea?

Y'all are always comparing guns to cars, yet everyone owning a car is required to have insurance.
 
Howey said:
Why's that a bad idea?

Y'all are always comparing guns to cars, yet everyone owning a car is required to have insurance.
Click to expand...
Because poor people have as much right as anyone else to own a gun without the expense of a tax/insurance that they cannot afford. A good example would be people stuck in the sheet hole ghettos, who obviously would leave if they could afford to, butt need a gun to defend themselves from home invasions, etc . Should the 47 million people on Food Stamps be forced to buy insurance or maybe you feel that they should not own a gun, or maybe the Government could provide them with "gun insurance", like they do the Food Stamps? This gun insurance is just another form of gun control like they did to hunting in Califa, where hardly anyone I know goes hunting "anymoore" because there are just too many regulations. Admit to the American People that you are against any gun ownership and if you could have your way, no one "butt" the police would own a gun, just "come out" and tell US the truth, Howey?
 
SJJRSJJS said:
Because poor people have as much right as anyone else to own a gun without the expense of a tax/insurance that they cannot afford. A good example would be people stuck in the sheet hole ghettos, who obviously would leave if they could afford to, butt need a gun to defend themselves from home invasions, etc . Should the 47 million people on Food Stamps be forced to buy insurance or maybe you feel that they should not own a gun, or maybe the Government could provide them with "gun insurance", like they do the Food Stamps? This gun insurance is just another form of gun control like they did to hunting in Califa, where hardly anyone I know goes hunting "anymoore" because there are just too many regulations. Admit to the American People that you are against any gun ownership and if you could have your way, no one "butt" the police would own a gun, just "come out" and tell US the truth, Howey?
Click to expand...

I'm sorry. I didn't get the memo. I was unaware poor people weren't required to carry car insurance. Requiring gun owners to carry insurance to cover those instances of irresponsibility is the right thing to do. There is, after all, no such thing as a responsible gun owner.

SmarterthanYou said:
how is it constitutional, in any sense, to require insurance for certain forms of travel (a protected constitutional right)?
Click to expand...

Oh, damn. Another memo I didn't get.

I didn't know the Bill of Rights contained a Right to Travel.
 
Howey said:
Oh, damn. Another memo I didn't get.

I didn't know the Bill of Rights contained a Right to Travel.
Click to expand...

As early as the Articles of Confederation the Congress recognized freedom of movement (Article 4), though the right was thought to be so fundamental during the drafting of the Constitution as not needing explicit enumeration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_under_United_States_law

Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." As far back as the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), the Supreme Court recognized freedom of movement as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the Court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them."[1] However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position the Court held consistently through the years in cases such as Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1871), the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) and United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883).[2][3]
 
SmarterthanYou said:
As early as the Articles of Confederation the Congress recognized freedom of movement (Article 4), though the right was thought to be so fundamental during the drafting of the Constitution as not needing explicit enumeration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_under_United_States_law

Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." As far back as the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), the Supreme Court recognized freedom of movement as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the Court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them."[1] However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position the Court held consistently through the years in cases such as Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1871), the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) and United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883).[2][3]
Click to expand...
:
Did that say anything about travel by car? Nobody's preventing anyone from going state to state, unless like you they're on a restraining order.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and like all other rights, there is no power to limit due to technology.
Click to expand...

Says the buffoon who insists the Constitution should be literally interpreted.

Which is it?

You want to interpret the Constitution literally?

Drive a covered wagon or horse.

Carry a musket.

Drink unpasteurized milk.

See the medicine man.
 
Howey said:
Says the buffoon who insists the Constitution should be literally interpreted.

Which is it?

You want to interpret the Constitution literally?

Drive a covered wagon or horse.

Carry a musket.

Drink unpasteurized milk.

See the medicine man.
Click to expand...
talk about buffoon. does it say 'keep and bear muskets'????
sorry I shot your bullshit position full of holes, but try not being an ass about it.
 
Howey said:
Oh. You're right.

Keep your arms.

And legs.

Turn in the fucking guns.

dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
You are on the losing side Howey, because there will be no new gun laws passed, period. I do not give a sheet about your North Eastern Lib States cohors taking away your guns, butt do not try to take our guns away, because you can't. You do not seem to get it, do you Howey? Why do you still read(take your orders) from the Georgi Soros playbook, like the Commie Manifesto that, by the way, I have. I read it to keep ahead of you and your Cabalistas......Next good shooter, this one has done run out of ammo....TOUCHE'
 
Stone Pig with Wings said:
we need to eliminate the traitors. it's the only thing that can bring us true peace of mind.
Click to expand...
You need to take care with any insuations, because there are posters from the old Board who would turn you in for terrorist threats if they could, trust me on that one. I know how ruthless they can be, when they think they have the upper hand. There are real Left Wing Radicals Pros posting on here, who I believe are payed to post their agendas, using different user names, 24/7. I know this sounds way out there, but think about it.
 
SJJRSJJS said:
You need to take care with any insuations, because there are posters from the old Board who would turn you in for terrorist threats if they could, trust me on that one. I know how ruthless they can be, when they think they have the upper hand. There are real Left Wing Radicals Pros posting on here, who I believe are payed to post their agendas, using different user names, 24/7. I know this sounds way out there, but think about it.
Click to expand...

I get paid $1 per word, so watch out. I'm watching you.
 
Howey said:
I get paid $1 per word, so watch out. I'm watching you.
Click to expand...
I have been reading and analyzing Left Wing strategery for many moons now, and I have come to the conlusion that there are Lib "Briiliant Writer" pros posting on here, butt of course you do not fit that category yet, butt keep trying. Why do you think that certain posters follow other certain posters around, always ready to verbally defend each other, you must see it on here? They come out of the same hole to post, so they are like busom buddies, or butt buddies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top