Sick Gun Grabbers want all gun owners insured

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
EACH STATE has variations on this, but they ALL require a license to own a weapon.

no, each state does not.

Really? Please name the state where I can just walk in and buy a gun WITHOUT showing any I.D., or have a license to carry, concealed or other wise. If you can't, then STFU.

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
EACH STATE has a National Guard that is and can be put under the direct control of the Federal Gov't.

The National Guard is considered the organized militia. NO SHIT SHERLOCK! That is PRECISELY what I've been trying to drum into that thick skull of yours. There is a LAW that states the National Guard is the "OFFICIAL MILITIA", as opposed to any yahoo and their friends with guns who just declare such when they want to. the rest of us are considered the unorganized militia. nothing of which you put on here tells anyone that the people no longer have a right to bear arms.

Who said they didn't have the right to bear arms, you libertarian lunkhead? I didn't....I just pointed out the FACT that the Constitution points out they can do so 'IN ORDER TO FORM A WELL REGULATED MILITIA'...and the National Guard has been LEGALLY and OFFICIALLY place as that WELL REGULATED militia, and not a bunch of clowns who may/may not decide to gather together and call themselves such.

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
EACH STATE has LAWS that either do or do not allow for militias to be formed. And there is a LAW which states that the National Guard replaces individual militas FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Being that Congress/Senate branches are the direct representatives of 'we the people' (you know, the framers of the constitution), their 'opinion' as you put it tells us EXACTLY what the national guard was intended to do and it was NOT to replace the well regulated militia of the 2nd Amendment.

Hey jackass, get a civics teacher from high school to explain the process of how a LAW and an AMENDMENT come into play...and how a sub-committtee's findings or decisions do NOT automatically translate into the aforementioned. Please do this, because I am damned tired of doing the home work for stubborn, willfully ignorant people like you.

The Law regarding the National Guard and it's purpose STANDS...unless YOU can provide an AMENDMENT or OFFICIAL REPEAL of that law, then you're just blowing smoke. Carry on.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Really? Please name the state where I can just walk in and buy a gun WITHOUT showing any I.D., or have a license to carry, concealed or other wise. If you can't, then STFU.

make up your mind. license or ID????? if you can't keep the debate on a single track, how do you expect to discuss with the adults?

Hey jackass, get a civics teacher from high school to explain the process of how a LAW and an AMENDMENT come into play...and how a sub-committtee's findings or decisions do NOT automatically translate into the aforementioned. Please do this, because I am damned tired of doing the home work for stubborn, willfully ignorant people like you.

The Law regarding the National Guard and it's purpose STANDS...unless YOU can provide an AMENDMENT or OFFICIAL REPEAL of that law, then you're just blowing smoke. Carry on.

you are also delusional and wrong. you're dismissed. I will give no more credence to your idiot machinations.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Really? Please name the state where I can just walk in and buy a gun WITHOUT showing any I.D., or have a license to carry, concealed or other wise. If you can't, then STFU.

make up your mind. license or ID????? if you can't keep the debate on a single track, how do you expect to discuss with the adults?

I stated that all states require a license to own a weapon.......Ever hear of a DRIVERS LICENSE, bunky? Or a non-driver's I.D. (which is a substitute for the aforementioned)? No matter how hard you try, you can't avoid the FACT that in one state you just need a driver's license, but in another state you need a little more than that. So again, why does a little background check have you soiling your undies so?

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Hey jackass, get a civics teacher from high school to explain the process of how a LAW and an AMENDMENT come into play...and how a sub-committtee's findings or decisions do NOT automatically translate into the aforementioned. Please do this, because I am damned tired of doing the home work for stubborn, willfully ignorant people like you.

The Law regarding the National Guard and it's purpose STANDS...unless YOU can provide an AMENDMENT or OFFICIAL REPEAL of that law, then you're just blowing smoke. Carry on.

you are also delusional and wrong. you're dismissed. I will give no more credence to your idiot machinations.

Translation: STY CANNOT meet the simple criteria placed before him....nor can he logically or factually disprove what I stated previously. So like all intellectual cowards, STY just bluffs and blusters and runs away. He's done.