Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
That republicans will now expand medicaid, child tax care credits, child care
Yes any day now
Yes any day now
Since Roe is gone I'm sure
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
That republicans will now expand medicaid, child tax care credits, child care
Yes any day now
Nope, Republicans don't care about babies after they come out.
BidenPresident
Verified User
That republicans will now expand medicaid, child tax care credits, child care
Yes any day now
Of course! Why the doubt.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello guno,
It's all included in Trump's fabulous new health care plan that 'everybody is going to love.'
He will be unveiling it any day now.
That republicans will now expand medicaid, child tax care credits, child care
Yes any day now
It's all included in Trump's fabulous new health care plan that 'everybody is going to love.'
He will be unveiling it any day now.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Guaranteed paid maternity leave for both parents, like in France.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Why should we as a nation expand socialist welfare programs just because some women can't keep their damn legs together? Maybe we should put stronger strictures on casual sex and out-of-wedlock sex on society rather than demand everyone pay for those who can't control their carnal desires for ten minutes or whatever...
saltydancin
Verified User
So one could theorize the Roe ruling of thieving US Constitution arsonists killing of babies is going back to business as usual with thieving US Constitution arsonists killing everyone with a banger of cross conditioning the Islamidiotocracy so everyone will pay attention like Russia's Orthodox Church rootin' tootin' Putin.....
It's never been about the sanctity of life.
No one actually believes a blastocyst or a first trimester fetus is a human being. That's why conservatives don't run into burning fertility clinics to save blastocysts, or propose felony first degree murder charges for women who choose abortion.
The anti-reproductive choice movement has always led by angry Incels who are stressed out about female sexuality.
Here is my proof -->
No one actually believes a blastocyst or a first trimester fetus is a human being. That's why conservatives don't run into burning fertility clinics to save blastocysts, or propose felony first degree murder charges for women who choose abortion.
The anti-reproductive choice movement has always led by angry Incels who are stressed out about female sexuality.
Here is my proof -->
BidenPresident
Verified User
Gardner is just a hatemongering jerk. Typical Trump supporter.
He said he will do it on the day after he releases his tax returns...which he promised to do on the day after Mexico pays for that great wall he built across the southern border.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Rape and Rape-Related Pregnancy: By the Numbers
Almost 3 million women in the U.S. experienced RRP during their lifetime.
The prevalence of RRP was similar across racial and ethnic groups (i.e., Hispanic, White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, and other non-Hispanic).
About 18 million women have experienced vaginal rape in their lifetime. Women who were raped by a current or former intimate partner were more likely to report RRP (26%) compared to those raped by an acquaintance (5.2%) or a stranger (6.9%). The truth is most rapes are not even reported in the US because Rape Victims are more that just often times berated in Courtrooms by people like you that always blame the women or teenage girl victims- IN THE SAME MANNER YOU JUST DID HERE IN THE FORUM and as we all just witnessed.
Of women who were raped by an intimate partner, 30% experienced a form of reproductive coercion by the same partner. Specifically, about 20% reported that their partner had tried to get them pregnant when they did not want to or tried to stop them from using birth control. About 23% reported their partner refused to use a condom.
Women raped by an intimate partner who reported RRP were significantly more likely to have experienced reproductive coercion compared to women who were raped by an intimate partner but did not become pregnant.
There are many reasons why women should not be forced by law to carry a pregnancy against their will- or against a doctors professional advice! Rape is just one of them.
Here is another reason why certain women should have an abortion- Health reasons! https://qz.com/1108193/whats-killing-americas-new-mothers/
Last edited:
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Frank,
LOL!
Actually, those tax records have finally been released. So Trump will have to move the goalposts again and create some other unlikely condition.
LOL!
Actually, those tax records have finally been released. So Trump will have to move the goalposts again and create some other unlikely condition.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Could somebody translate that into English please? I don't speak gibberish...
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Rape is a criminal act, as I'm sure you're aware. The issues of rape are really separate from abortion as a result. Sure, pregnancy can occur from a rape, and does, but that's a tiny fraction of the total abortions performed in the US. It can also be made an exception.
What we shouldn't be doing is making small exceptions the general case and rule for laws.
saltydancin
Verified User
Just as those suicidal super egos of thieving US Constitution arsonists avoidance in acceptance of "man is God" while killing persons granted standing & license with repeatedly stealing & burning the law of the land; but Christiananality pedophilia master race economics of Islamididotocracy reasoning is what's gibberish & pseudoscience .....
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
I've never condoned abortions for reasons of Birth Conttrol.
It surprised me to see that over 1,000,000 abortions are reported every year- AND THOSE ARE JUST THE ONES THAT ARE REPORTED TO THE CDC.
It wouldn't surprise me to learn that there may be over 2 million abortions carried out in the US every year.
But, I also realize that abortions should be a women's or family's choice- or based on a doctors professional decision- NOT A DECISION TO BE MADE BY STATE LEGISLATORS FOR POLITICAL POWER GRABS, one-up·man·ships, OR FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS.
The consequences, as a direct result of banning abortions, will have a gravely enormous negative impact on our society overall.
The main two reasons are- many women will die as a result of carrying their babies to term- And as many as 2 million unwanted babies being born every year will end up being orphaned and a huge financial burden on local and state governments to feed them, raise them, and keep a roof over their heads until grown!
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET!
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
I'd say banning them is as equally bad as legalizing them on demand through the third trimester as many pro-abortion fanatics want. Either way is a political power grab.
My view is legalize them (either at the state level--preferred, or federal--a second worst choice) through the first trimester with exceptions made for rape and sound medical reasons thereafter. That seems quite reasonable. At the same time, make it a couple's right to choose by including the man (exception rape obviously), and link those decisions to who has legal custody and pays child support (if that becomes an issue).
All of that is fair and equal.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
are you that incompetent that you can't care for your own children?
What we "SHOULD BE DOING" is getting our noses out of a decision that belongs only to the woman in whose body the pregnancy is occurring...and her doctor, if she wants to include the doctor.
The decision to terminate a pregnancy belongs only to the person in whose body the pregnancy is occurring...not to some judges, legislatures, or gods.
1) No one is pro-abortion, TA, and you know it.
2) You anti-choice people think you can make personal choices for others where that kind of thing is totally inappropriate. In the case of whether or not to terminate a pregnancy, IT IS INAPPROPRIATE.
3) Leaving decisions of this magnitude to states rather than treat them at a federal level is like leaving decisions on whether or not to allow slavery to the states rather than handle it at a federal level.
4) The reason some people argue for abortion through the third trimester is because the anti-choice people want to start the prohibition at the moment conception takes place. If you anti-choice people would get off that unreasonable position, I am sure the pro-choice people would make reasonable accommodation.