So let’s take this one at a time.

PostmodernProphet said:
his history of being overturned on appeal says otherwise.....his choice to use a DC grand jury for the Florida indictments says otherwose.....he may have quite a few cooperating witnesses, but that depends on whether they have something other than hearsay testimony.......that's been the problem with all your investigations so far.....
Click to expand...

What is his history? Its established law that if part of the crime happens in the jurisdiction of the Grand Jury, it is acceptable to use that jurisdiction.

Trump just might learn that if you fuck around you gunna find out.
 
Jarod said:
What is his history? Its established law that if part of the crime happens in the jurisdiction of the Grand Jury, it is acceptable to use that jurisdiction.

Trump just might learn that if you fuck around you gunna find out.
Click to expand...

and yet, the crime he is charged with is not taking, but keeping.......no part of the crime occurred in DC......

his history?...
Among his more notable corruption cases, Smith prosecuted the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, a Republican. Although Smith scored a conviction against McDonnell, the case was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” (Politico, 6/27/16). The High Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of power
Click to expand...
https://americafirstpolicy.com/latest/fact-sheet-jack-smith-a-record-that-speaks-for-itself
8-0, cuntselor......and that was in 2016, before Trump appointed four justices......

the same link provides information which may reveal why Smith has a hard on for Trump.....
Smith prosecuted Arizona congressman Rick Renzi on corruption charges, which the Supreme Court upheld. Renzi was later pardoned by former President Trump. Renzi declared that he had been “wrongly convicted by a Department of Justice that engaged in witness tampering, illegal wiretapping, and gross prosecutorial misconduct.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).
Click to expand...
 
does the past predict the future?....
Smith prosecuted and convicted former Democrat vice presidential nominee John Edwards. “By not losing on any of the six felony counts for which he was being tried, John Edwards won the biggest victory of his political and legal life . . . A mistrial on five counts and an acquittal on one resulted in a clear -- if not complete -- legal vindication and a likely fatal setback for federal prosecutors seeking to convict the former U.S. senator and 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee for allegedly violating the Federal Election Campaign Act.” (U.S. News, June 1, 2012).
Click to expand...
 
more Smith failures....
Smith prosecuted Democrat Bob Menendez on public corruption charges. The case ended in a mistrial. “The way this case started was wrong, the way it was investigated was wrong, the way it was prosecuted was wrong, and the way it was tried was wrong as well,” Menendez said outside the courtroom at the time.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).
Click to expand...
 
Jarod said:
Not lies, at this point its basically established fact. Nobody is denying them.

Are you saying Trump was not involved in the process of setting up the fake electors?
Click to expand...

anyone who doesn't realize the "fake electors" were making a political protest and not breaking any laws is as bad a prosecutor as Jack Smith, cuntselor....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
anyone who doesn't realize the "fake electors" were making a political protest and not breaking any laws is as bad a prosecutor as Jack Smith, cuntselor....
Click to expand...

Haha, thats funny, did you not read the Cheeseman memo? That memo is what us lawyers call "evidence".
 
Jarod said:
you cant keep if you don't take...
Click to expand...

odd then that Smith couldn't make a case out of taking......maybe it was because out of over 20 boxes of documents packed by a government agency without Trump's personal supervision and moved by them to Florida, seized by the FBI and combed over by Smith they could only identify 10 pieces of paper (none containing the alleged nuclear secrets).......I don't see a case for "taking" there either......you?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and yet, the crime he is charged with is not taking, but keeping.......no part of the crime occurred in DC......

his history?...

https://americafirstpolicy.com/latest/fact-sheet-jack-smith-a-record-that-speaks-for-itself
8-0, cuntselor......and that was in 2016, before Trump appointed four justices......

the same link provides information which may reveal why Smith has a hard on for Trump.....
Click to expand...

"AmericaFirstPolicy" says it all, the most biased article I might have ever read.
 
Jarod said:
Maybe, but that judge has a worse record of being overturned than Smith.

She did not realize she had to swear in a jury.
Click to expand...

and to you that seems a worse record than being reprimanded by a bipartisan SC for being "the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors which is a threat to our separation of power".....
 
Jarod said:
"AmericaFirstPolicy" says it all, the most biased article I might have ever read.
Click to expand...

lol....I'm asking you to read a quote from an 8-0 USSC decision and you're concerned with the bias of the publication I link......how about the bias that the court observed in a prosecutor who made them believe that "the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of power"......how about the bias of a Florida ambulance chaser who ignores what a unanimouse, pre-Trump SC said about Smith, the king of mistrials......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....I'm asking you to read a quote from an 8-0 USSC decision and you're concerned with the bias of the publication I link......how about the bias that the court observed in a prosecutor who made them believe that "the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of power"......how about the bias of a Florida ambulance chaser who ignores what a unanimouse, pre-Trump SC said about Smith, the king of mistrials......
Click to expand...

I read it, he fucked up, like any attorney sometimes does. I suspect he learned from it, but the fact that you read articles like that explains a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top