Solution to the "Asylum Seeker" problem.

Swallowin Cum said:
Eligible? We care about that now? Wouldn't be up to you either would it now Francis.
Click to expand...

It's up to the AG. Why pretend you don't know how he ruled?

Legion said:
Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions made it all but impossible for asylum seekers to gain entry into the United States by citing fears of domestic abuse or gang violence.

Sessions’s decision in a closely watched domestic violence case was a turn in a long-running debate over what constitutes a need for asylum.

He reversed an immigration appeals court ruling that granted asylum to a Salvadoran woman who said she had been sexually, emotionally and physically abused by her husband.

Sessions’s decision overturned a precedent set during the Obama administration that allowed women to claim "credible fears" of domestic abuse and will make it impossible for such arguments to prevail in immigration courts. He said the Obama administration created “powerful incentives” for people to “come here illegally and claim a fear of return.”

Asylum claims have expanded too broadly to include victims of “private violence,” like domestic violence or gangs, Sessions wrote in his ruling, which narrowed the type of asylum requests allowed.

The number of people who told homeland security officials that they had a credible fear of persecution jumped to 94,000 in 2016 from 5,000 in 2009.

“The prototypical refugee flees her home country because the government has persecuted her,” Sessions wrote in his ruling. “An alien may suffer threats and violence in a foreign country for any number of reasons relating to her social, economic, family or other personal circumstances,” he added. “Yet the asylum statute does not provide redress for all misfortune.”

Because immigration courts are housed under the Justice Department, not the judicial branch of government, he had the authority to overturn their decisions.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/us/politics/sessions-domestic-violence-asylum.html
Click to expand...
 
countryboy said:
Lol, riiiight. What are the chances you personally know at least two members of this forum? You're full of shit.
Click to expand...

Suit yourself. I don't recall claiming to "personally know" the fake Saudi princess, BTW.

A simple Google search will reveal the truth, if you use the correct keywords.
 
Legion said:
Do you see a citation for her claim?





So you were wrong.
Click to expand...

So you say, I have no idea what gas is going for in NYC nor when she posted this; as in, what it was selling for then. Sounds like you have a personal beef with her to me. How is that connected to your hissyfitting here on migrants? Do we need to steer away from that topic now?
 
my solution is very simple:

First, no more anchor babies. The vast majority of countries in the world do not allow anchor babies and we shouldn't either. If a kid is born in the USA both parents (no single hos) should have been permanent residents of the USA for at least 5 years.

Now with that out of the way, I would allow for a two track immigration system, the 1st track would allow general entry to anyone that applies, which would be a streamlined and fast way to get permanent residence here quickly for themselves and families. However anyone on the fast track entry program waives all rights to eventually acquiring citizenship or social welfare benefits. Fast trackers will also be compelled to go to weekly cultural assimilation classes for a year or be deported permanently.

The second track would be our standard wait in line system. However if you wait in line and apply and you have useful job skills and you do it by the book, you can get on citizenship track within 20 years or w/e it is. For skilled workers and not shitholers I wouldn't even mind having them be citizens in 10.

This is an insanely reasonable solution on the part of someone like me that doesn't want dirty shitholers in our country. It is a very fair compromise and allows millions of families to come to america and make a better life for themselves, while guaranteeing democrats can't use them for vote pandering or welfare drain. Everyone that isn't try to actually take advantage of the situation for political purposes win. The shitholers win, conservatives win because the shithoelrs aren't taking our welfare money or voting for welfare money, and the democrats win because of diversity and feels.
 
Cornelius said:
my solution is very simple:

First, no more anchor babies. The vast majority of countries in the world do not allow anchor babies and we shouldn't either. If a kid is born in the USA both parents (no single hos) should have been permanent residents of the USA for at least 5 years.

Now with that out of the way, I would allow for a two track immigration system, the 1st track would allow general entry to anyone that applies, which would be a streamlined and fast way to get permanent residence here quickly for themselves and families. However anyone on the fast track entry program waives all rights to eventually acquiring citizenship or social welfare benefits. Fast trackers will also be compelled to go to weekly cultural assimilation classes for a year or be deported permanently.

The second track would be our standard wait in line system. However if you wait in line and apply and you have useful job skills and you do it by the book, you can get on citizenship track within 20 years or w/e it is. For skilled workers and not shitholers I wouldn't even mind having them be citizens in 10.

This is an insanely reasonable solution on the part of someone like me that doesn't want dirty shitholers in our country. It is a very fair compromise and allows millions of families to come to america and make a better life for themselves, while guaranteeing democrats can't use them for vote pandering or welfare drain. Everyone that isn't try to actually take advantage of the situation for political purposes win. The shitholers win, conservatives win because the shithoelrs aren't taking our welfare money or voting for welfare money, and the democrats win because of diversity and feels.
Click to expand...

See your Wall Street/donor/"job creator" class who has always and forever lobbied and think tank legislated for the presence of these under-the-table slaves in america.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
See your Wall Street/donor/"job creator" class who has always and forever lobbied and think tank legislated for the presence of these under-the-table slaves in america.
Click to expand...

I agree. You wont get an argument for me on that. Both republicans and democrats have sold out america to shit holers. When you are a rich billionaire the world is your playground, the concept of a nationstate is meaningless when you can jet to any of the best places in the world no problem. oh people are taking dumps in the street? oh dear I guess I'll just go to my 3rd house then where all the shitholers are priced out. this is why much of the base hates ryan/romney/mccain and other weak republican sellouts.
 
Swallowin Cum said:
I have no idea what gas is going for in NYC nor when she posted this; as in, what it was selling for then.
Click to expand...

If you click the link all will be made plain to you.

krudzu said:
Gasoline is $5,00 a gallon in NYC.
Click to expand...

Need help figuring it out?

Swallowin Cum said:
She cites her shit.
Click to expand...

krudzu said:
Gasoline is $5,00 a gallon in NYC.
Click to expand...

Swallowin Cum said:
She cites her shit.
Click to expand...

Do you see a citation for her claim?

krudzu said:
Gasoline is $5,00 a gallon in NYC.
Click to expand...

So you were wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top