Some Anti-Kavanaugh Protesters Were Paid

Master Fang said:
You rightwingers are a special brand of retard aren't you?
Click to expand...

They are indeed. People w/o principles have a hard time imagining that anyone might march and/or protest just because they have a strong belief in a cause other than the typical RW "What's In It For Me" bandwagon. Therefore, they must be checking paychecks. Probably from that Soros fellow they worry so much about.
 
eddie said:
They are indeed. People w/o principles have a hard time imagining that anyone might march and/or protest just because they have a strong belief in a cause other than the typical RW "What's In It For Me" bandwagon. Therefore, they must be checking paychecks. Probably from that Soros fellow they worry so much about.
Click to expand...

I agree that anyone who suggests Americans can't protest is wrong but once again we have a proggy who doesn't read before commenting. What is it with you people? The OP is about people getting paid and they admitted they got paid so stop it with the "it must be about the paycheck" crap because even they admitted it.
 
Guille said:
Paid protesters. I don't think anyone is shocked to hear that activism is a business.



https://www.weeklystandard.com/holm...veal-some-anti-kavanaugh-protesters-were-paid

My question is: should anyone paid to organize or oversee a protest have to identify themselves, publicly and frequently? I say Yes, they should have to.

A protest can be powerful because it's assumed to be an expression on an important issue by the people but if a fringe group is driving it and directing it in such a way that it appears to be more than it is then they should have to identify themselves. What I mean by that is if a group like ultraviolet is manufacturing a scene then they should have to let people know they are behind it; by that I mean signage all over the actual protest site and a banner identifying them as being responsible for the protest and its presentation on any social media clips, or MSM clips for that matter because not doing so is in my opinion being extremely dishonest about the nature of the protest. Occupy never hid the fact that they were behind their protests.
Click to expand...

When trump has a rally, do you think buses are there by magic? All large groups have some organization. Someone pays for the buses bringing in the reds. I would be surprised if there were not professionals helping.
 
Guille said:
No.



Yes.



Yes.



I agree.


I don't see what any of this has to do with my OP.
Click to expand...

i have been at lots of rallies and marches for free. Essentially you are claiming pros are in charge of protests. it is not true. Just your shot at smearing Dems. Typical for you.
 
Nordberg said:
i have been at lots of rallies and marches for free. Essentially you are claiming pros are in charge of protests. it is not true. Just your shot at smearing Dems. Typical for you.
Click to expand...

Once again, you didn't actually read the OP did you?

WHY WON'T PROGGY READ?
 
Guille said:
Paid protesters. I don't think anyone is shocked to hear that activism is a business.



https://www.weeklystandard.com/holm...veal-some-anti-kavanaugh-protesters-were-paid

My question is: should anyone paid to organize or oversee a protest have to identify themselves, publicly and frequently? I say Yes, they should have to.

A protest can be powerful because it's assumed to be an expression on an important issue by the people but if a fringe group is driving it and directing it in such a way that it appears to be more than it is then they should have to identify themselves. What I mean by that is if a group like ultraviolet is manufacturing a scene then they should have to let people know they are behind it; by that I mean signage all over the actual protest site and a banner identifying them as being responsible for the protest and its presentation on any social media clips, or MSM clips for that matter because not doing so is in my opinion being extremely dishonest about the nature of the protest. Occupy never hid the fact that they were behind their protests.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you come to this forum and quote the Washington Times- a well known Extreme Right Wing Fake News source?

That is hilarious!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-times/

giphy.gif


Next thread PLEASE!
 
Guille said:
I do actually check multiple sources to verify claims before I state something as a fact. You and the other progtards apparently don't do that though, had you done so you'd know the story is legit.
Click to expand...

Sorry but you Trumpster-Divers are no longer trusted to have any credibility what-so-ever and neither does your president, your Republican led legislative branches, your stacked Supreme Court, or your Fake News Sources.

Sorry, but you fail!

200.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top