Another demonstration of massive ignorance re: the impeachment process.
How many times do you fucking simpletons have to be instructed about impeachment?
Some of my less learned posters need a primer on impeachable offences.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Another demonstration of massive ignorance re: the impeachment process.
How many times do you fucking simpletons have to be instructed about impeachment?
Moron, he was referring to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE, not 77,000 votes in three states.
Comprende, dullard?
ROFL..a stunning rebuttal! (not)
Then you are a dumbass who does not understand due process. Get educated!
I can't fix your stupidity, dullard.
I can only try to point out and correct your ignorance. So far, it's an exercise in futility for you willfully ignorance halfwits.
(Apologies to the halfwits)
The will of the people is the majority, Trump one based on the electoral college which does not represent the will of the people.
No, I already explained to you, The investigation is coming to an end, now is the time for the presentation of the evidence. After that will be the vote on impeachment.
Precedence says you are wrong/ basic fairness says you are wrong. the fact Schiff is taking testimony as a deposition, instead of fact finding says you are wrong ( depositions are for crimes -there is no crime claimed) -no Article of Impeachment alleging such-
..the fact it's being held in a SCIF - when Schiff himself says the hearing are not classified says you are wrong
I could go on and one -you are always wrong, because your mind is composed of partisan noise
I have to pay attention because that is bizarre. I think a poster did something like that to me here once but I cannot recall who it was. I think the name began with an "A". It would never occur to me to ever do such an asinine thing. lol
Last edited:
pathetic. the will of the people is expressed thru elections. are you claiming the election is illegitimate?
Translation: as usual you got nothing.I can't fix your stupidity, dullard.
I can only try to point out and correct your ignorance. So far, it's an exercise in futility for you willfully ignorance halfwits.
(Apologies to the halfwits)
Precedence is irrelevant, you fucking moron. The previous two , Nixon and Clinton, had either special prosecutors or independent counsel. Where is that here, idiot?
So what if the depositions are held in a SCIF?
There is only one rule regarding impeachment proceedings, you fucking idiot. Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution.
"The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
That's it, ignorant fuck.
The House sets its own rules and procedures re: impeachment. Don't like it? Tough shit.
Try to educate yourself, you ignorant fuck. Then, get back to us and try to not bullshit us with your ignorance.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Cinnabar,
Wow, he sure spins it silly. And several direct lies.
Lie: "The Ukrainians did nothing to try to get the aid turned back on."
Lie: "The Ukrainians didn't even know aid was withheld."
They knew it and they requested that it get turned back on before the call.
There seems to be another constant that is part of the Trump Fan Narrative, that 'Nothing has changed,' and 'The call does not contain a quid pro quo.'
Well, I'm sorry but that's just fundamentally wrong. Everything changed with Taylor's testimony and opening statement, and Taylor's statement IS the quid pro quo, and Trump takes ownership of it with the call.
People who refuse to look at the evidence stand on swampy quicksand as they claim there is no evidence of wrongdoing.
Wow, he sure spins it silly. And several direct lies.
Lie: "The Ukrainians did nothing to try to get the aid turned back on."
Lie: "The Ukrainians didn't even know aid was withheld."
They knew it and they requested that it get turned back on before the call.
There seems to be another constant that is part of the Trump Fan Narrative, that 'Nothing has changed,' and 'The call does not contain a quid pro quo.'
Well, I'm sorry but that's just fundamentally wrong. Everything changed with Taylor's testimony and opening statement, and Taylor's statement IS the quid pro quo, and Trump takes ownership of it with the call.
People who refuse to look at the evidence stand on swampy quicksand as they claim there is no evidence of wrongdoing.
Third grade behavior.
He also admitted that they will never admit that this is a legitimate investigation with an actual offense. So they will continue to move the goal posts and who cares? These POS can screw themselves. In fact, this entire mess should be treated as a RICO crime and who knows if this jerk will not be swooped up in the dragnet. This liar denied knowing about a sexual abuse situation.
Rep. Jim Jordan’s Sex Abuse Scandal Is Getting Much, Much Worse
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/0...abuse-scandal-is-getting-much-much-worse.html
No, they are worse than North Koreans who live where there is no access to actual truth, facts, knowledge. Our cultists have access to those things, yet willfully blind themselves to reality. The N. Koreans don't have a chance to learn about reality.
And if the Toadstool had his way, we would be just like them, with only one "news" source. It would be Fox, of course, and be the official govt. channel.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
you're psychotic.
What an excellent point. I'm going to borrow this if you don't mind, and use it whenever I hear one of our low-info Reichwing friends claim that the impeachment is just a trick to undo the election and the will of the ppl. Well done!
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
how can you tell its desperation and not just their usual stench.......