Some of the illegals arrested by ICE in Minnesota

You know that is bullshit, it’s coming from Noem, been documented umpteen times as a lie, Ice is i discriminatingly busting people


Basically, if you look Spanish or speak another language, Ice could bust you
All MAGAts are evil, traitorous liars.

ah6xti.jpg
 
You know that is bullshit, it’s coming from Noem, been documented umpteen times as a lie, Ice is i discriminatingly busting people


...arrested on September 27 due to previous convictions for cocaine and marijuana possession...

“George Retes was arrested and has been released,” she said. “He has not been charged. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is reviewing his case, along with dozens of others, for potential federal charges related to the execution of the federal search warrant in Camarillo.”

A repeat of the Retes case involving that marijuana farm in California.

Last week, the 13-year-old was arrested by Everett police for allegedly threatening another student at his school.

While the boy's mother waited at police headquarters following his arrest, she discovered her 13-year-old son had been turned over to ICE and quickly moved out of state.
The article makes no mention of his or his mother's immigration status.

"Illegal aliens who claim to be recipients of DACA are not automatically protected from deportations," a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement. "DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country. Any illegal alien who is a DACA recipient may be subject to arrest and deportation for a number of reasons, including if they’ve committed a crime.

The article makes no mention of any specifics of any individual case so it is entirely possible those arrested by ICE had other criminal convictions or charges pending.

This is a one-sided article about a Salvadorian national, Mario Guevara, and being held on criminal charges and is in ICE custody. There was no attempt at balance in it by getting ICE's side of the story.

Another DACA case. This time the article tries an appeal to pity fallacy. The ICE response to the article was:

...a senior DHS official said in an email, “Deferred action does not confer any form of legal status in this country.”

“The facts are this individual is an illegal alien. This Administration is not going to ignore the rule of law,” the original statement read.

This article is behind a paywall.

This article is behind a paywall. Note: The Intercept is a radical Leftist publication.

Another appeal to pity fallacy article.

After her asylum case was denied in 2007, she appealed up to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but her final appeal was denied “sometime in 2012 or 2013,” Ahluwalia said. Since then, she had checked in with ICE every six months for 13 years. Because she was repeatedly checking in with ICE while under a final order...

So, this woman had a final order of removal slapped on her 13 years ago and the government hadn't removed her. That the Trump administration is going to do that, finally, seems a case of justice delayed.

A one-sided 'hit piece' by the ACLU. There was no attempt at balance nothing cited as rebuttal by ICE, just the ACLU cherry picking the facts they wanted to present.

Another one-sided hit piece in the form of an appeal to pity.

Another radical Leftist site that offers up nothing but an appeal to pity without any balance or rebuttal.
Basically, if you look Spanish or speak another language, Ice could bust you
Basically, if you are in the US illegally ICE can bust you and should.
 
...arrested on September 27 due to previous convictions for cocaine and marijuana possession...


“George Retes was arrested and has been released,” she said. “He has not been charged. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is reviewing his case, along with dozens of others, for potential federal charges related to the execution of the federal search warrant in Camarillo.”



A repeat of the Retes case involving that marijuana farm in California.


Last week, the 13-year-old was arrested by Everett police for allegedly threatening another student at his school.

While the boy's mother waited at police headquarters following his arrest, she discovered her 13-year-old son had been turned over to ICE and quickly moved out of state.
The article makes no mention of his or his mother's immigration status.


"Illegal aliens who claim to be recipients of DACA are not automatically protected from deportations," a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement. "DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country. Any illegal alien who is a DACA recipient may be subject to arrest and deportation for a number of reasons, including if they’ve committed a crime.

The article makes no mention of any specifics of any individual case so it is entirely possible those arrested by ICE had other criminal convictions or charges pending.


This is a one-sided article about a Salvadorian national, Mario Guevara, and being held on criminal charges and is in ICE custody. There was no attempt at balance in it by getting ICE's side of the story.


Another DACA case. This time the article tries an appeal to pity fallacy. The ICE response to the article was:

...a senior DHS official said in an email, “Deferred action does not confer any form of legal status in this country.”

“The facts are this individual is an illegal alien. This Administration is not going to ignore the rule of law,” the original statement read.


This article is behind a paywall.


This article is behind a paywall. Note: The Intercept is a radical Leftist publication.


Another appeal to pity fallacy article.

After her asylum case was denied in 2007, she appealed up to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but her final appeal was denied “sometime in 2012 or 2013,” Ahluwalia said. Since then, she had checked in with ICE every six months for 13 years. Because she was repeatedly checking in with ICE while under a final order...

So, this woman had a final order of removal slapped on her 13 years ago and the government hadn't removed her. That the Trump administration is going to do that, finally, seems a case of justice delayed.


A one-sided 'hit piece' by the ACLU. There was no attempt at balance nothing cited as rebuttal by ICE, just the ACLU cherry picking the facts they wanted to present.


Another one-sided hit piece in the form of an appeal to pity.


Another radical Leftist site that offers up nothing but an appeal to pity without any balance or rebuttal.

Basically, if you are in the US illegally ICE can bust you and should.
But were to believe Noem? It’s no mystery she doesn’t want anyone but her team doing the recent shooting
 
But were to believe Noem? It’s no mystery she doesn’t want anyone but her team doing the recent shooting
Are we to believe some nobody "journalist" with an axe to grind? It's no mystery that those opposed to ICE, for the most part, are willing to say anything that will gain them support in opposition to ICE no matter how big a lie or half-truth it may be.

What I'm seeing is there are a fair number of non-US citizens that are here illegally, or have compromised their legal alien status, and often have either slipped through the cracks or been otherwise allowed to stay after violating US laws in some way. Some even had final orders of deportation but were given stays or the order was never executed on them.

Now, the Trump administration is rounding these people up and deporting them. They often were deportable before Trump took office, and the only thing that changed is Trump is actually enforcing US immigration law to the maximum rather than the minimum or even, as the Biden administration did, ignoring it.
 
Are we to believe some nobody "journalist" with an axe to grind? It's no mystery that those opposed to ICE, for the most part, are willing to say anything that will gain them support in opposition to ICE no matter how big a lie or half-truth it may be.

“5% of People Detained By ICE Have Violent Convictions, 73% No Convictions”​


Not quite the picture Noem is attempting to project, and the Cato Institute is anything but a left leaning source
 

“5% of People Detained By ICE Have Violent Convictions, 73% No Convictions”​


Not quite the picture Noem is attempting to project, and the Cato Institute is anything but a left leaning source
How many have charges pending?



Even within your own article it says:

  • Nearly half had no criminal conviction nor even any pending criminal charges.
That is, more than 50% had a criminal conviction or pending charges (57% by the article's data).

Kind of changes the narrative when you remove the "Violent convictions" qualifier.

So, are you willing to overlook other criminal activity than "violent crime" in the case of illegals? Are you willing to do that when there are over 10,000 cases of it just in ICE arrests of illegals alone in 2025?

Are you siding with these criminals and saying they should be allowed to stay?

Should people here illegally in any situation be allowed to stay? If so, why?
 
I started this thread as proof of it.

Are anti-ICE protesters trying to end ICE arrest and deportation operations?

Are anti-ICE protesters trying to help persons in the US illegally avoid arrest by ICE?

Are anti-ICE protesters calling for an end to ICE itself?

The answer to all three, both by word and deed is a resounding YES. That means they are defending the murderous, rapist, etc., criminals among illegal aliens in the US.
Why was Ross using a cell phone instead of his body cams? They all had them. Why were they all "turned off". Why refuse to share info with local le.

I get it Terry. You need to dehumanize that poor murdered woman in order for you to maintain piece of mind.

You always bloviate about "proper police procedure" when you try to railroad Byrd.

The ICE agent shot at the vehicle after it was clear of you thug murderer hero of yours? -> no problem, according to Terry.

ICE policy is that all body cameras be on during enforcement actions. -> no comment from Terry.

Your hypocrisy is so fucking transparent you intellectually dishonest and broken person.

May Buddha have mercy on ya, thug.
 
How many have charges pending?



Even within your own article it says:

  • Nearly half had no criminal conviction nor even any pending criminal charges.
That is, more than 50% had a criminal conviction or pending charges (57% by the article's data).

Kind of changes the narrative when you remove the "Violent convictions" qualifier.

So, are you willing to overlook other criminal activity than "violent crime" in the case of illegals? Are you willing to do that when there are over 10,000 cases of it just in ICE arrests of illegals alone in 2025?

Are you siding with these criminals and saying they should be allowed to stay?

Should people here illegally in any situation be allowed to stay? If so, why?
Who knows, all we have is Noem’s data on what happens to who after they are grabbed

No one is opposed against arresting immigrants with serious criminal histories, rather the manner in which anyone even suspected of being an immigrant is removed from the pubic. For decades prior to Trump it was done at a fraction of the cost but not by masked men in full military dress
 
Those who are attacking ICE and defending the illegals are more of the rapists, pedophile, drug dealers, and murders.

Birds of a feather...

-
 
How many have charges pending?



Even within your own article it says:

  • Nearly half had no criminal conviction nor even any pending criminal charges.
That is, more than 50% had a criminal conviction or pending charges (57% by the article's data).

Kind of changes the narrative when you remove the "Violent convictions" qualifier.

So, are you willing to overlook other criminal activity than "violent crime" in the case of illegals? Are you willing to do that when there are over 10,000 cases of it just in ICE arrests of illegals alone in 2025?

Are you siding with these criminals and saying they should be allowed to stay?

Should people here illegally in any situation be allowed to stay? If so, why?
^^^
Will do or say anything to protect his Orange Jesus and the traitors and drug leaders he pardoned all while screaming he's a supporter of Law and Order. Weird!
 
Why was Ross using a cell phone instead of his body cams? They all had them. Why were they all "turned off". Why refuse to share info with local le.

I get it Terry. You need to dehumanize that poor murdered woman in order for you to maintain piece of mind.

You always bloviate about "proper police procedure" when you try to railroad Byrd.

The ICE agent shot at the vehicle after it was clear of you thug murderer hero of yours? -> no problem, according to Terry.

ICE policy is that all body cameras be on during enforcement actions. -> no comment from Terry.

Your hypocrisy is so fucking transparent you intellectually dishonest and broken person.

May Buddha have mercy on ya, thug.
Ross clearly wanted the ability to delete anything he didn't like.
 
Those who are attacking ICE and defending the illegals are more of the rapists, pedophile, drug dealers, and murders.

Birds of a feather...

-
Does this mean you support the Pedo President, all his pedo friends and the drug leaders and terrorists he pardons?
 
Back
Top