Somebody name one

That's like asking me if I disagree with those people who are against Fascism. :laugh:
I don't know why you people do this as if you think you're being smart. You know exactly what I'm talking about.


Well, as some people have stated, in reality and by evolution, everyone is racist. That's another topic in it's own.
so you understand why the term racist is extremely broad and a more specific description is not as broad?


The context is pretty clear. Were we talking about racists of different colors?
I'm sorry what context, I didn't see any.


What mistake?
using to broaden the term when that was clearly speaking about something very specific.


Okay. So now back to that one. Does people knowing or meeting a few, whatever that means, white supremacists mean there aren't that many?
What do you mean by that many how many?
 
I don't know why you people do this as if you think you're being smart. You know exactly what I'm talking about.

I know you were talking about the violence.

so you understand why the term racist is extremely broad and a more specific description is not as broad?

Yep.

I'm sorry what context, I didn't see any.

The context are the white supremacists.

using to broaden the term when that was clearly speaking about something very specific.

Did no such thing.

What do you mean by that many how many?

Hence that's exactly what the subject was about!!! LOL.

How many BLM members are violent? How many do they riot and loot?
How many Antifa members are violent? How many do they do damage?
How many White Supremacists are violent? How many have they killed?
 
I know you were talking about the violence.
caused by antifa.
The context are the white supremacists.
the context of the word racist is white supremacists? How?




Hence that's exactly what the subject was about!!! LOL.
okay I'm not sure when the conversation was about that. I said that they were rare. I never used a term like many it's too broad it can mean anything.
How many BLM members are violent? How many do they riot and loot?
vastly more than white supremacists. There's plenty of reason to think there's far more of them than there is of white supremacists that run around and do violence.
How many Antifa members are violent? How many do they do damage?
I would say vastly more than white supremacists but I'm not sure that they're not white supremacists. It was in chop in Seattle the first time I had ever seen blacks only areas.
How many White Supremacists are violent? How many have they killed?
Well again that depends on whether or not antifa is white supremacists there's enough reasoning to suggest that they are it's strictly white people engaging in it and when they set up their own autonomous zone they had blacks only area. I wasn't alive during segregation so that's the first time I had ever seen official segregation in my life on the basis of race.

so it depends on what you mean by white supremacist does it have to be someone who's right wing? If so why? Explain this segregation based on race during the antifa protests.
 
Monarchists and Socialist Authoritarians are on the Left. Free Trade libertarian and small gov't conservatism are on the right. Just because Hitler had it backwards, doesn't mean you have to do it, too.

Hitler was further Left than Social Democrats..

Hitler ruthlessly arrested, incarcerated, and executed German communists, German socialists, German Social Democrats.

The Nazis purged all leftist elements from their party back in the 1920s.

The only opposition in Germany to Hitler was from the German left. The German right went along with Hitler.

Here is where you are fucking up: you are never going to learn actual history from the Sean Hannity show. I recommend enrolling in a university level modern European history course
 
caused by antifa.

No proof of that.

the context of the word racist is white supremacists? How?

We were talking about the white supremacists. As I have stated, it's an umbrella term.

If you want to talk about the racists of other colors, you can start a new thread.

okay I'm not sure when the conversation was about that. I said that they were rare. I never used a term like many it's too broad it can mean anything.
vastly more than white supremacists. There's plenty of reason to think there's far more of them than there is of white supremacists that run around and do violence.
I would say vastly more than white supremacists but I'm not sure that they're not white supremacists. It was in chop in Seattle the first time I had ever seen blacks only areas.

That's the claim I was addressing.

How many ACTUAL BLM and Antifa members committed violence. Every time a white supremacist group is brought up, they were like what examples and who? I haven't met many of them.

I haven't met any BLM or Antifa members, much less promoting violence yet.

so it depends on what you mean by white supremacist does it have to be someone who's right wing? If so why? Explain this segregation based on race during the antifa protests.

You'll need to explain that one.
 
Hitler ruthlessly arrested, incarcerated, and executed German communists, German socialists, German Social Democrats.

The Nazis purged all leftist elements from their party back in the 1920s.
most socialists and communist dictators exterminate their own people. That's kind of like a trademark of this. It would be no different if we tried it here. The socialism cannot work if all the people aren't participating in it so you would have to make them participate by force or exterminate them. A capitalist libertarian society can let a communist commune or a socialist community exist. Claiming a dictator exterminated dissidents doesn't indicate that the dictator wasn't the head of a socialist government. It just means that this is a problem with socialism. Well that and famine.
The only opposition in Germany to Hitler was from the German left. The German right went along with Hitler.
claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Here is where you are fucking up: you are never going to learn actual history from the Sean Hannity show. I recommend enrolling in a university level modern European history course
You don't need college to learn things. When you say go to this indoctrination camp and go into indentured servitude via "student loans" to learn the correct way to think that sends a red flags everywhere. There's plenty written on history you can read for free. if you need someone to pick and choose for you what is that someone thinks is accurate you are being indoctrinated.
 
No proof of that.
what would be proof of that is there a such thing? Maybe you defending antifa is white people call you antifa.


We were talking about the white supremacists. As I have stated, it's an umbrella term.
no I was I pointed out to you that there are many people that aren't white that can be racist and you agreed.
If you want to talk about the racists of other colors, you can start a new thread.
I wasn't the one using an extremely broad term that didn't mean strictly white supremacists


That's the claim I was addressing.
what claim are you addressing the one I made or the one I didn't make?
How many ACTUAL BLM and Antifa members committed violence.
several orders of magnitude greater than white supremacists committing violence if so show me the hate crime.
Every time a white supremacist group is brought up, they were like what examples and who? I haven't met many of them.
what like the ku Klux Klan? I'm not saying I haven't met any of them are you haven't heard of any riots over the past year which ones were they?
I haven't met any BLM or Antifa members, much less promoting violence yet.
are you having either but there's evidence that they're doing this Portland Capitol Hill autonomous zone Kenosha Wisconsin what did those buildings all just burn themselves down was that the ku Klux Klan in secret? Was it lizard people?


You'll need to explain that one.
okay Capitol Hill attorney was an antifa thing and they had blacks only areas that's racial segregation. The only reason you would want to keep the blacks away from you is because you didn't like them because they're black. Segregation is a white supremacist thing.
 
And yet Republicans defended Trump's Ukrainian scandal
There was no scandal to defend.

...and refused to condemn him when he talks about banning flag-burning,
Because "condemning" is too extreme. Every Trump supporter with whom I have spoken on the matter is in agreement that that just isn't going to happen.

... banning Biden from running for president,
Trump never said that.

... giving himself a third term,
Trump supporters thoroughly applaud every time Trump strings along humorless Leftists. In fact, we'll join in with calls for "Trump 2028!" We're joking of course, but that's the point, Leftists have lost all sense of reason and can't tell when they are being played.

Hey, I'm voting for Trump in 2024! (you panic in 3, ... 2, ... 1, ... now!)

ignoring mail-in ballots,
Nope. Trump is seeking free and fair elections. He seeks to prevent the DNC from committing massive voter fraud. Only those seeking to commit massive voter fraud condemn Trump for seeking free and fair elections.

... his calls for voter intimidation,
Never happened.

... his telling his supporters to commit voter fraud,
Never happened. Democrats, however, did. They have already discarded military absentee ballots that were cast for Trump. They were discovered and it is being investigated.

Conservatism's origins are authoritarian.
Nope, Conservatism's origins are Libertarian, i.e. individual freedom, that which is hated most by the Left. Conservatism's origins involve free markets and free trade, what Karl Marx called the one "that single, unconscionable freedom" and "naked exploitation." The Left is forever trying to destroy any and all freedom in trade and the Right is forever seeking more and more freedom, both individual and market.

And while most Conservatives aren't Fascist, they will always be very susceptible to Fascism.
Fascism is Leftist; it is a form of socialism. Conservatives reject fascism utterly as it is antithetical to both individual freedoms and free markets.

Marxists of all types, however, mindlessly OBEY calls of fascists to push their agenda.
 
what would be proof of that is there a such thing? Maybe you defending antifa is white people call you antifa.

Eh? Maybe you're drunk. It's okay. I'm drunk too and it's Sunday. ;)

no I was I pointed out to you that there are many people that aren't white that can be racist and you agreed.
I wasn't the one using an extremely broad term that didn't mean strictly white supremacists

Yep. Agreed.

several orders of magnitude greater than white supremacists committing violence if so show me the hate crime.

So no proof they were responsible for them?

what like the ku Klux Klan? I'm not saying I haven't met any of them are you haven't heard of any riots over the past year which ones were they?

okay Capitol Hill attorney was an antifa thing and they had blacks only areas that's racial segregation. The only reason you would want to keep the blacks away from you is because you didn't like them because they're black. Segregation is a white supremacist thing.

Dude, you got drawn into a propaganda. Be aware.
 
There was no scandal to defend.


Because "condemning" is too extreme. Every Trump supporter with whom I have spoken on the matter is in agreement that that just isn't going to happen.


Trump never said that.


Trump supporters thoroughly applaud every time Trump strings along humorless Leftists. In fact, we'll join in with calls for "Trump 2028!" We're joking of course, but that's the point, Leftists have lost all sense of reason and can't tell when they are being played.

Hey, I'm voting for Trump in 2024! (you panic in 3, ... 2, ... 1, ... now!)


Nope. Trump is seeking free and fair elections. He seeks to prevent the DNC from committing massive voter fraud. Only those seeking to commit massive voter fraud condemn Trump for seeking free and fair elections.


Never happened.


Never happened. Democrats, however, did. They have already discarded military absentee ballots that were cast for Trump. They were discovered and it is being investigated.


Nope, Conservatism's origins are Libertarian, i.e. individual freedom, that which is hated most by the Left. Conservatism's origins involve free markets and free trade, what Karl Marx called the one "that single, unconscionable freedom" and "naked exploitation." The Left is forever trying to destroy any and all freedom in trade and the Right is forever seeking more and more freedom, both individual and market.


Fascism is Leftist; it is a form of socialism. Conservatives reject fascism utterly as it is antithetical to both individual freedoms and free markets.

Marxists of all types, however, mindlessly OBEY calls of fascists to push their agenda.

TL ; DR
 
Some right wingers but not all have trouble perceiving distinctions. For them there is white and black, good and bad, democrats and non-racists. It's a reason Donald Trump is polluting the democracy.

Racism. The United States is not a democracy. It is a federated republic. There are currently no democracies anywhere on Earth.
 
We are a Constitutional Republic.

"A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.” "

http://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Author/21
Redundant. A republic is itself constitutional government. The United States is a federated republic. We have not only constitutionally based government, we have layers of constitutions.
 
Back
Top