Somebody name one

[CFM]

I do have the ability to define any word I choose to create. You can't take that away either.

You didn't create any of those words.

I already took it away.

 

[CFM]

Contextomy fallacy. Denial of logic.

Can't you come up with anything better. You're not real good at what you're trying to do.

 

[CFM]

Contextomy fallacy.

Still bad at what you're trying to do, boy.

 

[AProudLefty]

I said in the past 12 months I see you can't be honest.

Missing the point.

if there was a severe problem with white supremacists you would think there would be something happening. But there's not there's nothing happening the only thing that's happening it's far leftist rioting.

Define severe problem. Is it something like mass shootings?

But just saying something's propaganda because it's inconvenient isn't really that good of an argument.

It is assumed to be a propaganda when it has no proof or mixed with half truths. It's a technique used by Goebbels and it worked well. It works on you.

 

[Into the Night]

You didn't create any of those words.

I already took it away.

Contextomy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Can't you come up with anything better. You're not real good at what you're trying to do.

Void argument fallacy.

 

[CFM]

Contextomy fallacy.

Still failing but keep trying.

 

[CFM]

Void argument fallacy.

Your attempt to do anything is void.

 

[Into the Night]

Still bad at what you're trying to do, boy.

Void argument fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Still failing but keep trying.

Void argument fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Your attempt to do anything is void.

Mockery. Bulverism fallacy.

 

[CFM]

Mockery. Bulverism fallacy.

I am mocking you. It's easy.

 

[StoneByStone]

Patriotic Amercans of every stripe in that group, fighting against the Socialists

And a "Socialist" is anyone they disagree with.

 

[Into the Night]

I am mocking you. It's easy.

You have no argument anymore. Done here.

 

[Into the Night]

And a "Socialist" is anyone they disagree with.

Generally quite true, since it is socialists that are burning, looting, and vandalizing.

 

[CFM]

You have no argument anymore. Done here.

I've made my argument and proved you were a dumbass. After that is when the mocking started.

 

[AProudLefty]

I've made my argument and proved you were a dumbass. After that is when the mocking started.

He's unique, huh?

 

[Arks&sparka]

Missing the point.

you missed the point. Riots cause way more victimization than a group of hillbillies but liking black people. Probably because the latter is far less prominent.

Define severe problem. Is it something like mass shootings?

City blocks being burned down. No I wouldn't consider .01% of murder to be severe.

It is assumed to be a propaganda when it has no proof or mixed with half truths. It's a technique used by Goebbels and it worked well. It works on you.

Show that what you claim to be propaganda really is. Show that you aren't presenting mixed truths.

 

[AProudLefty]

you missed the point. Riots cause way more victimization than a group of hillbillies but liking black people. Probably because the latter is far less prominent.

Actually you missed the point. Was the BLM responsible for the Rodney King riots?

Show that what you claim to be propaganda really is. Show that you aren't presenting mixed truths.

Yes it can be a mixture of truths and falsehoods. The truth is that there have been riots. What's not proven is that the BLM was behind it.

 

[Wolverine]

And a "Socialist" is anyone they disagree with.

Nope anyone stupid enough to vote democrat!