Arks&sparka
Verified User
Define the organization.
Define a BLM leader. you can say BLM leaders came out and condemned the violence other BLM leaders led the charge.
Somebody name one
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Oh excuse me. Movement.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
I don't really care that an organization like this chose that moniker. That doesn't make them the soul orbiters of the ideology.
I think it's stupid of them to identify with violence. They should be pressing lawsuits against anybody who's using their moniker but it's not really theirs they borrowed it from the rioters because they wanted to be identified with them.
They could have called themselves anything else but they chose that.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
The movement is not organized it's borderline schizophrenic the part of it wants to burn down everything one part wants to commit other crimes like blocking up roads. Another part of it wants to have legitimate protests.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So now the goalpost has been moved. It is now *some* BLM groups and leaders.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
BLM isn't a group it's a movement you said that yourself and post number 563. I don't care that there's various groups that don't do anything they don't matter.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Oh excuse me. Chapters. And how are they leaders if they don't have groups/chapters to lead?
So you now admit that the BLM "movement" is not responsible for the riots? That's a progress.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
you don't have to have a chapter or a group you just have to have followers to lead.Oh excuse me. Chapters. And how are they leaders if they don't have groups/chapters to lead?
The movement is partially responsible for the riots.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Okay so the logic is that the pro-life movement/groups/chapters/leaders were partially responsible for the pro-life mass shootings?
Arks&sparka
Verified User
If you're talking about something that happened across multiple cities over months then yes but if you're talking about an isolated incident then no. Further mass shootings are normally perpetrated by one person riots are not
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I accept your concession.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
So you don't have any further arguments? You can pretend whatever you want.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Oh my argument has been made. You just refuse to accept your defeat.
Yes there are some BLM members or claim to be one who have been rioting. However, they do not represent the mission statement and the movement.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
must not have really been a defeat then.
there's no mission statement some arbitrary group has no control over the movement.
for you to pretend that this is what black lives matter is is dishonest.
Having a hard time seeing the defeat probably cuz it's not there
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Yep. Not much of a defeat when you have not presented any kind of evidence for your claim.
Arks&sparka
Verified User
At no point was I ever trying to prove anything. That's not what I do this for.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Then what are you even trying to do with me? lol
Arks&sparka
Verified User
I was trying to talk to somebody who held the different views than I did that's how I test out my views see if they're rational. I'll never find someone who challenges My views if I don't talk to people I disagree with.
Your challenge was mild if anything because you were so focused on defending. This seems to be something people do and they're not so sure about what they believe.
This is an exercise to seek out someone who could rationalize if you point different than mine.
But you've already declared victory so I don't know why this matters to you.
You're better than most on this forum. So many people just call you names if you don't agree just childish so I come into you for not doing that.