SmarterthanYou
rebel
for what it's worth, sessions and sotomayor should be lucky to have even been considered for a seat since non lawyers have usually been better judges.
Angry? That's the first time I've heard that. Most of the time I'm called "robotic". I argue like an engineer. I'm not angry, I'm just right.JWC, has everyone freaked out on this forum? I've never seen such an angry bunch.
I'm not angry, I'm just right.
Angry? That's the first time I've heard that. Most of the time I'm called "robotic". I argue like an engineer. I'm not angry, I'm just right.
You're not being consistent here. You said
"Pot calling the kettle black" means when somebody points out a flaw that they share."
That is not the correct definition of the phrase, as I pointed out.
In other words, I used it in its correct context. You did not.
Oh please. Talk to the hand. You can't even read. None of the arguments have even addressed my point on Jeff Sessions astounding hypocricy in calling Sotomayor racially biased considering his past comments and record. Instead of addressing my point, they played hair splitting on the meaning of a colloqueal phrase and even then they were wrong.Mott, stop while your behind; because you're embarassing yourself.
You've just been pwnd by at least 3 posters.
None of the arguments have even addressed my point on Jeff Sessions astounding hypocricy in calling Sotomayor racially biased considering his past comments and record. .
No, it's not logical. It's possible or maybe probable but to be logical one must know the context in which both made such comments. I don't think that Sotomayors stating that her struggles as a Latina female gave her an empathy others might not have is equivalent to the blatantly racist comments Sessions has made in the past such as saying he thought the KKK was not so bad a group until he found out they smoked pot or calling the NAACP "Communist" or "That pinko organization."if Sessions' past comments and record show racial bias, it is a logical conclusion that Sotomayor's show the same, neh?.......
motleydude = moronic wank
No, it's not logical. It's possible or maybe probable but to be logical one must know the context in which both made such comments. I don't think that Sotomayors stating that her struggles as a Latina female gave her an empathy others might not have is equivalent to the blatantly racist comments Sessions has made in the past such as saying he thought the KKK was not so bad a group until he found out they smoked pot or calling the NAACP "Communist" or "That pinko organization."
In other words you're "opinon" that Sotomayors comments on empathy equate with racial bias is just that, an opinon.
There can be no doubt about the racial bigotry of Sessions comments. That's not an opinion.
Therefore to compare the two as equivalent would be very illogical.
Oh please. Talk to the hand. You can't even read. None of the arguments have even addressed my point on Jeff Sessions astounding hypocricy in calling Sotomayor racially biased considering his past comments and record. Instead of addressing my point, they played hair splitting on the meaning of a colloqueal phrase and even then they were wrong.
Dude, when it comes to debate, you're a light weight. You've never, ever said anything of substance. You just sling mud and insults and have never expressed, that first time, an original thought. You just repeat what you hear on Foxnews and read on Newsmax.
No, it's not logical. It's possible or maybe probable but to be logical one must know the context in which both made such comments. I don't think that Sotomayors stating that her struggles as a Latina female gave her an empathy others might not have is equivalent to the blatantly racist comments Sessions has made in the past such as saying he thought the KKK was not so bad a group until he found out they smoked pot or calling the NAACP "Communist" or "That pinko organization."
In other words you're "opinon" that Sotomayors comments on empathy equate with racial bias is just that, an opinon.
There can be no doubt about the racial bigotry of Sessions comments. That's not an opinion.
Therefore to compare the two as equivalent would be very illogical.
No, it's not logical. It's possible or maybe probable but to be logical one must know the context in which both made such comments. I don't think that Sotomayors stating that her struggles as a Latina female gave her an empathy others might not have is equivalent to the blatantly racist comments Sessions has made in the past such as saying he thought the KKK was not so bad a group until he found out they smoked pot or calling the NAACP "Communist" or "That pinko organization."
In other words you're "opinon" that Sotomayors comments on empathy equate with racial bias is just that, an opinon.
There can be no doubt about the racial bigotry of Sessions comments. That's not an opinion.
Therefore to compare the two as equivalent would be very illogical.
Do you practice at being obtuse and stupid or is it a talent you were born with? I do so tire of unintelligable coments from GED equivalents such as you.
Hey, hey, HEY!
You're the one who spelled hypocrisy and chutzpah incorrectly in one freakin' paragraph.
Let's rethink your statement above, k?