“Speaker Johnson: Separation of church, state a misnomer”

First Amendment right for what?

In the image you can see that they have assembled (they have a right to do that) and they have a right to believe in something differently than you or I may believe which they demonstrate in the image. Your question here is telling, you do not seem to even pretend to understand or respect the Bill of Rights.
 
In the image you can see that they have assembled (they have a right to do that) and they have a right to believe in something differently than you or I may believe which they demonstrate in the image. Your question here is telling, you do not seem to even pretend to understand or respect the Bill of Rights.

I genuinely have no idea what you are talking about.
 


You are such a typical leftist moron, Althea.:palm::palm: Do you know that the West - Western culture/ civilisation - sprang from two fonts: the (spiritual) city of Jerusalem (CHRISTIANITY) and the (spiritual) city of ANCIENT ATHENS (reason/rational and logical thought).



If the Christian faith is destroyed (by non-Christian mass immigration, for example) in a Western nation like America, it will die. That is, it will cease to have a highly civilised Western culture, because The West = Jerusalem + Athens, the two working in harmony like the two wings of a dove that lofts itself higher up into the sky . Break off one wing (e.g. "Jerusalem"/Christianity) and the dove plummets to the ground. Or, to put it another way, the culturally sophisticated, advanced Western civilisation that was America, becomes a shit-hole just like any Muslim-majority, Arab state in the Middle East, or the murderous, crime-ridden. "failed state" that is South Africa, etc.



I don't think a cosseted, pampered, privileged, stupid, little American girl like you would really like to live in South Africa or Iran or New Guinea, Althea (?) Because living in these kind of "shit-holes- on - steroids" would drastically reduce your life-expectancy, sweetie-pie.



US President,John Adams, famously said: "America was created for a religious people". When he said this in the late 18th century, the term "religious people" meant "White Christian people. And this is why, in 2023, America is now falling apart, BIG TIME.


Just Sayin'


Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
 
You are such a typical leftist moron, Althea.:palm::palm: Do you know that the West - Western culture/ civilisation - sprang from two fonts: the (spiritual) city of Jerusalem (CHRISTIANITY) and the (spiritual) city of ANCIENT ATHENS (reason/rational and logical thought).



If the Christian faith is destroyed (by non-Christian mass immigration, for example) in a Western nation like America, it will die. That is, it will cease to have a highly civilised Western culture, because The West = Jerusalem + Athens, the two working in harmony like the two wings of a dove that lofts itself higher up into the sky . Break off one wing (e.g. "Jerusalem"/Christianity) and the dove plummets to the ground. Or, to put it another way, the culturally sophisticated, advanced Western civilisation that was America, becomes a shit-hole just like any Muslim-majority, Arab state in the Middle East, or the murderous, crime-ridden. "failed state" that is South Africa, etc.



I don't think a cosseted, pampered, privileged, stupid, little American girl like you would really like to live in South Africa or Iran or New Guinea, Althea (?) Because living in these kind of "shit-holes- on - steroids" would drastically reduce your life-expectancy, sweetie-pie.



US President,John Adams, famously said: "America was created for a religious people". When he said this in the late 18th century, the term "religious people" meant "White Christian people. And this is why, in 2023, America is now falling apart, BIG TIME.


Just Sayin'


Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
Got a Cliff Notes version of this mess?

It doesn't matter what religion the Founders were. If you're going to run a melting pot society, then you accept all religions.
 
Confart is terrified that he can't win a debate with TruthDetector, Yakuda, or me. :laugh: He is such a Chicken that even Colonel Sanders terrifies him.

From what the three you post day after day in this forum none of you would win a debate with a chicken. Knowing nothing (the chicken) is not better or worse than only knowing what you are programmed to say.
 
From what the three you post day after day in this forum none of you would win a debate with a chicken. Knowing nothing (the chicken) is not better or worse than only knowing what you are programmed to say.

How true. The last time I heard "you're a chicken," because you don't want to play in the sandbox with the short bus kids, was in kindergarten. :rofl2:
 
So no words that you can show which lead you to believe the constitution requires a "separation of church and state". One can only conclude you're imagining it. Once again you believe your FEELINGS are reality.

Are you still arguing that Islam and the US government should be fully integrated?
 
Here's the thing, Breakdown.

First, putting yourself in a category with Bullshit Blob and poor Yakky isn't exactly the pinnacle of self-promotion.

Second, JPP is not formatted for anything resembling a debate.

JPP is about flipping one another the finger to let off steam.
Those who try to attribute more propriety and decorum to the forum than that
are impossibly unrealistic.

Correct. There are no debates here. Because not one of these idiots even understands what they post. They are parrots. Every thread they start is cut and paste. Not one of them is able to articulate a position in their own words. Posting a link from a far right website isn’t ‘debate’. If this was an actual debate a neutral third party would evaluate the arguments and decide who makes a more convincing argument. I would be undefeated against every person I have on ignore. No exceptions. It is a rout.
 
Jefferson said the intent of the establishment clause was ‘to build a wall of separation between church and state’. The phrase was cited in Everson v Board of Education. Read it you stupid fucks. Suggesting that separation of church and state does not refer to this clause is beyond stupid. There is no reason to debate a fact.
 
Correct. There are no debates here. Because not one of these idiots even understands what they post. They are parrots. Every thread they start is cut and paste. Not one of them is able to articulate a position in their own words. Posting a link from a far right website isn’t ‘debate’. If this was an actual debate a neutral third party would evaluate the arguments and decide who makes a more convincing argument. I would be undefeated against every person I have on ignore. No exceptions. It is a rout.

Excuse me, but I have been commanded, as their h. sapiens sapiens representative, to inform you that our parrot masters are far more intelligent than the typical MAGAT. I've talked them out of filing a restraining order, this time. :laugh:

You are correct, though. The low-info low-IQ RWNJs here truly believe that posting an opinion from Twitter or Youtube or Breitbart or Newsmax means that they've posted actual factual information. They seem unable to distinguish opinion from fact, or wishful thinking from reality.
 
This is the American Taliban in action and speaking in plain sight, after they try everything to stop a citizen referendum on Abortion rights, ....and when they fail that, they instead switch to lying about what the referendum is about hoping people will be confused and vote against it... and when that fails, ... they lose the citizen vote.

Ohio GOP lawmakers call to block courts from implementing new abortion amendment

Several Ohio Republican lawmakers are proposing to strip courts of the authority to review cases related to implementing the newly passed Issue 1 abortion amendment.

In a statement released Thursday, four GOP lawmakers claimed without evidence that there was “foreign election interference” in the vote to pass Issue 1 and threatened to block the ability of courts to interpret the new constitutional amendment.

“To prevent mischief by pro-abortion courts, Ohio legislators will consider removing jurisdiction from the judiciary over this ambiguous ballot initiative,” the lawmakers said. “The Ohio legislature alone will consider what, if any, modifications to make to existing laws based on public hearings and input from legal experts on both sides.”

Issue 1 passed Tuesday with 57 percent of the vote. It creates a constitutional right to reproductive freedom in the state, which protects decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing a pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion up to the point of fetal viability.

It allows the state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability, which is generally between 22 and 24 weeks into pregnancy, except when necessary to protect the life or health of the mother. ...

A sampling below of some of the comments made by Ohio Republi'cans' arguing to exclude Courts from any role in these decisions.


8690y3.jpg


Yakuda, is this an acceptable way for Church and State to work together, in your view?

Is there a single Magot here who is willing to stand behind this as correct?
 
Well...E Pluribus Unum definitely didn't include indigenous humans.


Silly, little girl ! E Pluribus Unum is not the official motto of the United States (and has not been for a long, long time).

So, as Benny Hill would say....

"Put your finger in your ear and go: 'Ting-a-Ling-a-Loo' ! "



Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
 
Back
Top