SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR: We did NOT exonerate Joe Biden

What he made clear is they were certain they could not get a conviction. Biden's crime was at paperwork mishandling level. He cooperated at every point.
 
Correct. And Mueller did not exonerate Trump. But nonetheless you called it the Russia Hoax, so from now on we'll call this the classified documents hoax. Sound fair?

Cool.
 
first it was hillary, then trump, then biden.........one day you stupid fuckers just might wake up and realize that the 'system' is pitting us against each other to cover for their high office officials lining their pockets with our hard earned cash
 
What he made clear is they were certain they could not get a conviction. Biden's crime was at paperwork mishandling level. He cooperated at every point.
He made it clear the reason he thought he couldn’t couldn’t convict was because of Biden’s dementia
 
Correct. And Mueller did not exonerate Trump. But nonetheless you called it the Russia Hoax, so from now on we'll call this the classified documents hoax. Sound fair?

Cool.
The EVIDENCE showed Trump should not be charged Biden’s dementia saved him from being charged
 
Prosecutors DO NOT EXONERATE EVER. Just as Prosecutors do not find guilt.

it is not a role they have so the claim is meaningless. They either find enough EVIDENCE to charge or they do not.

Trials with findings of 'Not Guilty' are the only way to get exoneration.

Thinking there is any value to saying 'Hur did not exonerate' is as stupid as saying 'Hur did not say Biden did not commit theft' or 'Hur did not say Biden did not commit murder'.

Again Prosecutors NEVER speak to that, as that is not their job. Trials are the ONLY ones that can determine those.


But Magats gonna derp.
 
Prosecutors DO NOT EXONERATE EVER. Just as Prosecutors do not find guilt.
it is not a role they have so the claim is meaningless. They either find enough EVIDENCE to charge or they do not.
Trials with findings of 'Not Guilty' are the only way to get exoneration.
Thinking there is any value to saying 'Hur did not exonerate' is as stupid as saying 'Hur did not say Biden did not commit theft' or 'Hur did not say Biden did not commit murder'.
Again Prosecutors NEVER speak to that, as that is not their job. Trials are the ONLY ones that can determine those.
But Magats gonna derp.

And in Hur's assessment, there was sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial, but he and his staff found Biden sufficiently mentally impaired, aka incompetent, that he felt a reasonable jury would acquit or find Biden not guilty on account of that impairment or incompetence.

The question then becomes, if the above is true, why the fuck is Biden still in office?
 
And in Hur's assessment, there was sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial, but he and his staff found Biden sufficiently mentally impaired, aka incompetent, that he felt a reasonable jury would acquit or find Biden not guilty on account of that impairment or incompetence.

The question then becomes, if the above is true, why the fuck is Biden still in office?

Ya the problem you have is that is a flat out lie.

...Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report ultimately concluded “the evidence is not sufficient to convict” Biden and that “no criminal charges are warranted.”...

those are QUOTES right out of Hur report.

YOu cannot say 'but if Biden had better mental capacity that would be the needed extra 'evidence'.

So your constant stream of lies won't work with me Terry. Sorry.
 
It is not the job of the Special Council to exonerate. I don’t know why the ignorant Trumpublicans would ask this question. It’s misleading.
 
What he made clear is they were certain they could not get a conviction. Biden's crime was at paperwork mishandling level. He cooperated at every point.

nordi, it's called a two tier justice system. What I like best is the documents in open boxes left in his garage next to a Zappos box and an old dog bed.
 
Back
Top