T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
So? Prosecutors present what they want to a grand jury. They can manipulate one comprised of idiots easily.
SPLC scandal brings down Dems
- Thread starter Ichabod Stain
- Start date
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
These are trumped-up charges by Crazy Trump's gestapo DOJ; like there's haven't already been examples such of this such as James Comey and Letitia James.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
If the SPLC takes in around $100 million in grants and donations, while producing around $170 million in total revenue, that means the SPLC is relying on, and using, roughly 50% donor and grant money to do whatever they do, on average.
Southern Poverty Law Center Profile: Summary
Southern Poverty Law Center organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $8,230. Lobbying in 2024: $3,458,000. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.
www.opensecrets.org
Financial Information
The Southern Poverty Law Center’s latest financial information and annual report.
www.splcenter.org
There is reasonable inference from that that the SPLC is, indeed, using donor and grant funding to feed money to radical Rightwing groups for whatever purpose the SPLC thinks they're getting from that. That Google AI is STUPID enough to not credit less than 100% accurate date as "no credible evidence," which is how a reasonable person would read this, smacks of amateurish lawyering of the worst sort.
The SPLC, as I already stated relies almost entirely on donations and grants as a NON PROFIT organization to do what they do. "Unsubstantiated" is more like not totally verified. That is, it is reasonable to assume donations and grants, making up close to 100% of the SPLC's funding year-to-year, ends up comingled into money they are giving radical Rightwing groups.
It is disingenuous and even politically obvious, that Google AI has a slant trying hard to make a radical Leftist organization the SPLC (and that might be hyperbole, another thing Google AI doesn't understand) look better than its obvious legal problems are making it look.
So, Google AI dismisses my counterpoint without argument meaning it can't find fault with it. Google AI was WRONG on point one. On point two, Google AI is simply avoiding the issue. This is essentially nothing but a red herring argument.
Bottom line. Google AI's programming is biased towards supporting Leftist positions and institutions. It tries hard to make those look correct when they are clearly wrong.3. Bias analysis
- The content you provided packages sensational claims as fact without verifiable sources.
- Using misrepresented links or dramatic allegations is classic disinformation, often used to assert political bias.
- Claiming Google AI (or any fact-checker) is biased for disputing these claims is misframing. AI relies on verifiable, authoritative sources, not viral misinformation.
Summary
Claim Fact Check Bias Assessment Celebrities’ donations misused Unsubstantiated Speculative Trump “very fine people” misrepresented Contextual; previous fact-checks accurate Misinterpretation of context
Bottom line:
- There is no verified evidence supporting claims that SPLC misused donations.
- Allegations and links circulating online are misleading or unverified.
- Disputing these claims is not bias—it’s a reflection of relying on credible, authoritative sources rather than viral misinformation.
There is plenty of evidence based on what a reasonable person--not some canned AI program--would see as the SPLC misusing donations.
Trump's statement about Charlottsville was taken out of context and Google AI refuses to acknowledge that.
No, claiming Google AI, or any other fact checker, is biased is accurate. That Google AI demands 100% accuracy in statements of fact, verification of fact, or the like when those facts don't fit the political narrative Google is programmed to prefer is clearly a sign that the system is biased based on the preferences of those programming that AI.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
no.
its well known all those groups are spook groups to prop up hatred against whites and arrest a few dumb months to a dumb flame.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
or an LLM would be influenced by a preponderance of dumb Dems and they're talking points, the training data is lib imbeciles.If the SPLC takes in around $100 million in grants and donations, while producing around $170 million in total revenue, that means the SPLC is relying on, and using, roughly 50% donor and grant money to do whatever they do, on average.
Southern Poverty Law Center Profile: Summary
Southern Poverty Law Center organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $8,230. Lobbying in 2024: $3,458,000. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.
Financial Information
The Southern Poverty Law Center’s latest financial information and annual report.www.splcenter.org
There is reasonable inference from that that the SPLC is, indeed, using donor and grant funding to feed money to radical Rightwing groups for whatever purpose the SPLC thinks they're getting from that. That Google AI is STUPID enough to not credit less than 100% accurate date as "no credible evidence," which is how a reasonable person would read this, smacks of amateurish lawyering of the worst sort.
The SPLC, as I already stated relies almost entirely on donations and grants as a NON PROFIT organization to do what they do. "Unsubstantiated" is more like not totally verified. That is, it is reasonable to assume donations and grants, making up close to 100% of the SPLC's funding year-to-year, ends up comingled into money they are giving radical Rightwing groups.
It is disingenuous and even politically obvious, that Google AI has a slant trying hard to make a radical Leftist organization the SPLC (and that might be hyperbole, another thing Google AI doesn't understand) look better than its obvious legal problems are making it look.
So, Google AI dismisses my counterpoint without argument meaning it can't find fault with it. Google AI was WRONG on point one. On point two, Google AI is simply avoiding the issue. This is essentially nothing but a red herring argument.
Bottom line. Google AI's programming is biased towards supporting Leftist positions and institutions. It tries hard to make those look correct when they are clearly wrong.
There is plenty of evidence based on what a reasonable person--not some canned AI program--would see as the SPLC misusing donations.
Trump's statement about Charlottsville was taken out of context and Google AI refuses to acknowledge that.
No, claiming Google AI, or any other fact checker, is biased is accurate. That Google AI demands 100% accuracy in statements of fact, verification of fact, or the like when those facts don't fit the political narrative Google is programmed to prefer is clearly a sign that the system is biased based on the preferences of those programming that AI.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Only fools believe what is posted on the Funny Farm Gazette.
evince
Truthmatters
Now you know how the trump admin got this indictment
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Are you saying it's like the fairy tales that Bragg and James spun to get Trump in court?
Trump was given a rich man's trial and was found guilty of 34 felonies by a jury of peers..
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Trump was given a Soviet-style show trial with all the window dressings. Name for me, or show me a single other trial where the defendant found guilty of multiple felonies--34 in Trump's case, got no fine, no prison time, no probation, nothing, nada, zip-point-shit as the penalty for being found guilty. Show me one case of that.
He was permitted to act up in court. He gave speeches from the courthouse steps after every appearance. You try that and see what happens to you. He had a staff of high-priced lawyers. He delayed the trial many times until the sentencing came after the Supreme Court gave him immense new powers and protections. Trump got breaks no other person would have received. Trump is a 34-time guilty felon who walks the streets. Well, sits in a limo.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Show trial.