St. Louis couple who pointed guns at protesters indicted

I think the prosecutor will come to regret this...

This is a prosecutor that since coming to office has dismissed 5,400 of 7045 felony cases brought to her by the St. Louis PD. She has filed charges against the St. Louis PD for racism. She's taken $190,000 from George Soros’ Safety & Justice Committee in campaign money.

It sounds to me from her background she's hoping to run this couple dry of money defending themselves because the case is likely not to go very far in a trial. Them being lawyers also means she better have her ass well covered for a countersuit if she loses (which seems likely) for bringing frivolous charges forward.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I think the prosecutor will come to regret this...

This is a prosecutor that since coming to office has dismissed 5,400 of 7045 felony cases brought to her by the St. Louis PD. She has filed charges against the St. Louis PD for racism. She's taken $190,000 from George Soros’ Safety & Justice Committee in campaign money.

It sounds to me from her background she's hoping to run this couple dry of money defending themselves because the case is likely not to go very far in a trial. Them being lawyers also means she better have her ass well covered for a countersuit if she loses (which seems likely) for bringing frivolous charges forward.
Click to expand...

If it goes to trial they will never be convicted. This is how the demstapo wrongs.
 
AProudLefty said:
Were they on their property?
Click to expand...

Under Missouri's Stand Your Ground law, as outlined in Missouri Senate Bill 656 that went into effect 1/1/2017, if a person is in a place where they are permitted to be, they have the right to use deadly force to protect themselves or another innocent party, even if they potentially had the opportunity to safely retreat. That law applies whether the one using deadly force is on public or private property. Therefore, your question is irrelevant.

Under the law, the person using deadly force has to have a reasonable fear that the offender is threatening them or an innocent party with deadly force. Only the one defending him/herself with deadly force has the ability to make that determination. To say otherwise, would mean you believe someone else can read their mind.

It's OK. Governor Parsons has said if they are convicted, he'll pardon them.
 
AProudLefty said:
Nope they weren't. Unless you give me a source to prove me wrong.
Click to expand...

Where's your source showing they weren't. That was YOUR claim.

Again, it's OK, the honorable governor said he'd pardon them is a jury is ridiculous enough to convict.
 
CFM said:
Under Missouri's Stand Your Ground law, as outlined in Missouri Senate Bill 656 that went into effect 1/1/2017, if a person is in a place where they are permitted to be, they have the right to use deadly force to protect themselves or another innocent party, even if they potentially had the opportunity to safely retreat. That law applies whether the one using deadly force is on public or private property. Therefore, your question is irrelevant.

Under the law, the person using deadly force has to have a reasonable fear that the offender is threatening them or an innocent party with deadly force. Only the one defending him/herself with deadly force has the ability to make that determination. To say otherwise, would mean you believe someone else can read their mind.

It's OK. Governor Parsons has said if they are convicted, he'll pardon them.
Click to expand...

They were walking past the house. They weren't interested in the couple and their house.
 
AProudLefty said:
They were walking past the house. They weren't interested in the couple and their house.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. They entered a private location where they didn't belong.

Again, it's OK. The governor will pardon them if convicted and you'll continue supporting a bunch of thugs pretending what they're doing isn't violent.
 
CFM said:
Bullshit. They entered a private location where they didn't belong.

Again, it's OK. The governor will pardon them if convicted and you'll continue supporting a bunch of thugs pretending what they're doing isn't violent.
Click to expand...

A street is not a private property. And I noticed that you moved the goalpost to it being a "private location".
 
AProudLefty said:
A street is not a private property. And I noticed that you moved the goalpost to it being a "private location".
Click to expand...
That was a gated community and they were trespassing.......it was private property....was it not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top