Stalin-O-Crats Turn Tail and Run When Bolton Says He Will Take Them To Court

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
More proof that the Dunce-o-crat House Politburo KNOWS that their "IMPEACHMENT SHAM" IS, INDEED A SHAM. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton told Comrade Adam Schiff-Head that he had NO INTENTION PF APPEARING BEFORE THE STAR CHAMBER'S CLOSED DOORS, QUITE PUBLICLY.

To which the Stalin-O-Crat ringleader said, "We'll SUBPOENA YOU!!", to which Bolton replied..."BRING IT ON", adding that he would absolutely TAKE THE STALIN-O-CRATS to COURT, FORCING THEM TO SHOW CAUSE FOR THE SUBPOENA, and OPENING EVERY ONE OF THEM UP TO TESTIFYING, IN OPEN COURT , UNDER OATH, which would BRING THE "IMPEACHENT SHAM" DOWN IN FLAMES, as the SEDITIONIST WHISTLEBLOWER, also very likely JOHN BRENNAN, and SCHIFF FOR BRAINS HIMSELF, would be SUBJECT TO TESTIFYING UNDER OATH ABOUT THE OBVIOUS SETUP/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACYY AT THE ORIGINS of the POLITBURO's CURRENT NONSENSE...likely OPENING THEM UP TO MULTIPLE CHARGES THEMSELVES.

So, naturally, the PUSSY-ASSED LIE-O-CRATS TURNED TAIL and RAN....the LAST THING THEY WANT IS TO BE FORCED TO TELL THE TRUTH UNDER OATH..IN FRONT OF EVERYONE...






John Bolton defies House impeachment inquiry summons for closed-door testimony

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton and an aide to Vice President Mike Pence were invited to testify behind closed doors before a House impeachment panel Thursday, but Bolton failed to appear.

The House Intelligence Committee said his lawyer informed the lawmakers that Bolton would take the panel to court if it subpoenaed him, according to a committee official who requested anonymity to describe the situation. Three other National Security Council officials have testified under subpoena.

But Bolton’s former deputy, Charles Kupperman, filed a federal lawsuit asking the courts to rule which was more powerful: a congressional subpoena to testify or a White House directive to defy the subpoena. But no decision was expected until late December or early January, while public House hearings in the impeachment inquiry are scheduled to begin Wednesday.


~ The House withdrew its subpoena of Kupperman on Tuesday, saying it would rely on the U.S. District Court decision in the case of former White House counsel Don McGahn, who defied his own subpoena. McGahn’s case has been argued, but no decision has been released.

The committee regretted Bolton’s decision not to appear voluntarily, but the panel had no interest in waiting months for court decisions, according to the committee official. The White House instruction for Bolton not to appear will be added to evidence of Trump’s possible obstruction of Congress in any potential articles of impeachment, according to the committee official.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...pdates-john-bolton-called-testify/2516794001/


Riiight..because GOING TO COURT WILL BE YOUE DOWNFALL is the REAL REASON...and only the MOST IDIOTIC, DRUNK on KOOLAID LEFTISTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS.... :laugh:
 
Last edited:
More proof that the Dunce-o-crat House Politburo KNOWS that their "IMPEACHMENT SHAM" IS, INDEED A SHAM. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton told Comrade Adam Schiff-Head that he had NO INTENTION PF APPEARING BEFORE THE STAR CHAMBER'S CLOSED DOORS, QUITE PUBLICLY.


Such an intellectually challenged assessment...

Bolton willing to defy White House and testify if court clears the way, according to people familiar with his views

However, Bolton, a longtime GOP foreign policy adviser, does not want to comply with the Democratic inquiry without a court ruling on the ongoing constitutional dispute between the Trump administration and Congress, the people said.

Bolton is considered a high-value witness in part because, as national security adviser, he would have spoken directly with the president about U.S. foreign policy objectives in Ukraine.

His testimony is expected to be “damaging” to Trump, according to a person familiar with the matter.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-to-people-familiar-with-his-views/ar-BBWq6CC

This is a legal strategic move to protect Bolton from the possibility of a lawsuit down the road. Bolton is going to sing like a canary.
 
Last edited:
Such an intellectually challenged assessment...



This is a legal strategic move to protect Bolton from the possibility of a lawsuit down the road. Bolton is doing to sing like a canary.


THEN WHY IS SCHIFFHEAD AFRAID TO LITIGATE IT, UNDER OATH, IN THE OPEN?


RHETORICAL QUESTION: EVERYONE KNOWS WHY, except the LEFT DUPES...like YOU, OBVIOUSLY.

Makeup some more BULLSHIT. It was the GAUNTLET BEING THROWN, and the STALIN-O-CRATS PISSING THEIR PANTIES, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT HAVE NO CASE.



The only one SINGING RIGHT NOW, IS JAMES BAKER TO JOHN DURHAM.... OOOPOS!! SEDITION EXPOSED...
 
THEN WHY IS SCHIFFHEAD AFRAID TO LITIGATE IT, UNDER OATH, IN THE OPEN?


RHETORICAL QUESTION: EVERYONE KNOWS WHY, except the LEFT DUPES...like YOU, OBVIOUSLY.

Makeup some more BULLSHIT. It was the GAUNTLET BEING THROWN, and the STALIN-O-CRATS PISSING THEIR PANTIES, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT HAVE NO CASE.



The only one SINGING RIGHT NOW, IS JAMES BAKER TO JOHN DURHAM.... OOOPOS!! SEDITION EXPOSED...

Man, you are nuts. Almost every single person interviewed by the impeachment investigation said Trump was wrong. They told the truth. And soon they will do it on TV. This case is a lock.
 
Man, you are nuts. Almost every single person interviewed by the impeachment investigation said Trump was wrong. They told the truth. And soon they will do it on TV. This case is a lock.

Learn the Constitution. "Every person testifying" DO NOT GET TO DECIDE FOREIGN POLICY..ONLY THE PRESIDENT DOES. PERIOD. It was their SWORN DUTY TO CARRY IT FORTH...they DID NOT, BUT SOUGHT TO UNDERMINE IT, and SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR IT.

If the STALIN-O-CRATS HAVE A CASE..WHY ALL THE CLOSED DOORS? WHY ARE THEY AFRAID TO GO TO COURT?
 
Man, you are nuts. Almost every single person interviewed by the impeachment investigation said Trump was wrong. They told the truth. And soon they will do it on TV. This case is a lock.

Will you goof balls ever learn to not call slam dunks lol?

There’s so many things that could go South for Democrats on this I’m too lazy to list them.
 
More proof that the Dunce-o-crat House Politburo KNOWS that their "IMPEACHMENT SHAM" IS, INDEED A SHAM. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton told Comrade Adam Schiff-Head that he had NO INTENTION PF APPEARING BEFORE THE STAR CHAMBER'S CLOSED DOORS, QUITE PUBLICLY.

To which the Stalin-O-Crat ringleader said, "We'll SUBPOENA YOU!!", to which Bolton replied..."BRING IT ON", adding that he would absolutely TAKE THE STALIN-O-CRATS to COURT, FORCING THEM TO SHOW CAUSE FOR THE SUBPOENA, and OPENING EVERY ONE OF THEM UP TO TESTIFYING, IN OPEN COURT , UNDER OATH, which would BRING THE "IMPEACHENT SHAM" DOWN IN FLAMES, as the SEDITIONIST WHISTLEBLOWER, also very likely JOHN BRENNAN, and SCHIFF FOR BRAINS HIMSELF, would be SUBJECT TO TESTIFYING UNDER OATH ABOUT THE OBVIOUS SETUP/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACYY AT THE ORIGINS of the POLITBURO's CURRENT NONSENSE...likely OPENING THEM UP TO MULTIPLE CHARGES THEMSELVES.

So, naturally, the PUSSY-ASSED LIE-O-CRATS TURNED TAIL and RAN....the LAST THING THEY WANT IS TO BE FORCED TO TELL THE TRUTH UNDER OATH..IN FRONT OF EVERYONE...






John Bolton defies House impeachment inquiry summons for closed-door testimony

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton and an aide to Vice President Mike Pence were invited to testify behind closed doors before a House impeachment panel Thursday, but Bolton failed to appear.

The House Intelligence Committee said his lawyer informed the lawmakers that Bolton would take the panel to court if it subpoenaed him, according to a committee official who requested anonymity to describe the situation. Three other National Security Council officials have testified under subpoena.

But Bolton’s former deputy, Charles Kupperman, filed a federal lawsuit asking the courts to rule which was more powerful: a congressional subpoena to testify or a White House directive to defy the subpoena. But no decision was expected until late December or early January, while public House hearings in the impeachment inquiry are scheduled to begin Wednesday.


~ The House withdrew its subpoena of Kupperman on Tuesday, saying it would rely on the U.S. District Court decision in the case of former White House counsel Don McGahn, who defied his own subpoena. McGahn’s case has been argued, but no decision has been released.

The committee regretted Bolton’s decision not to appear voluntarily, but the panel had no interest in waiting months for court decisions, according to the committee official. The White House instruction for Bolton not to appear will be added to evidence of Trump’s possible obstruction of Congress in any potential articles of impeachment, according to the committee official.


https://www.topixpassport.com/quiz/...n=19601&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=yahoo.com


Riiight..because GOING TO COURT WILL BE YOUE DOWNFALL is the REAL REASON...and only the MOST IDIOTIC, DRUNK on KOOLAID LEFTISTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS.... :laugh:



NOW FOR THE FACTS, THE TRUTH IS THE THE COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT IT WASN'T WORTH IT, THAT THEY DIDN'T NEED TO PLAY ROPE A DOPE LITIGATING. JOHNNY SAID HE WOULD TESTIFY BUT ONLY IF ISSUED A SUBPOENA, AND WHEN THE TOLD HIM THEY WERE READY WITH THE SUBPOENA, HE RETURNED STATING HE WOULD ONLY DO SO AFTER HIS ATTORNEY SAID IT WAS ALRIGHT FOR HIM TO TESTIFY

THEY DON'T NEED BOLTON, THEY REALIZE HE PROBABLY LIE ANYWAY, AND LOOK AT HIS REFUSAL AS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE WHITE HOUSE REFUSING TO COOPERATING MAKING THEIR OBSTRUCTION CHARGE STRONGER


Now do you think you could type normal, your posts only look ridiculous oversize and capitalized
 
I always picture Grokmaster typing with only two fingers angrily while his face turns red.

MORE AD HOMS FROM THE WEAK BRAINED....

Creep much, stalker? Who the FUCK sits around "visualizing" members on a political forum....eewwwwwww….

Buy a LIFE, as you clearly need one....
 


NOW FOR THE FACTS, THE TRUTH IS THE THE COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT IT WASN'T WORTH IT, THAT THEY DIDN'T NEED TO PLAY ROPE A DOPE LITIGATING. JOHNNY SAID HE WOULD TESTIFY BUT ONLY IF ISSUED A SUBPOENA, AND WHEN THE TOLD HIM THEY WERE READY WITH THE SUBPOENA, HE RETURNED STATING HE WOULD ONLY DO SO AFTER HIS ATTORNEY SAID IT WAS ALRIGHT FOR HIM TO TESTIFY

THEY DON'T NEED BOLTON, THEY REALIZE HE PROBABLY LIE ANYWAY, AND LOOK AT HIS REFUSAL AS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE WHITE HOUSE REFUSING TO COOPERATING MAKING THEIR OBSTRUCTION CHARGE STRONGER


Now do you think you could type normal, your posts only look ridiculous oversize and capitalized

Horse shit. They BAILED BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT THEY CANNOT SHOW CAUSE, and WILL BE SUBPOENAED THEMSELVES. DIPSHIT. HAVE SOME MORE KOOL-AID.


Very easy to read thank you.
 
Will you goof balls ever learn to not call slam dunks lol?

There’s so many things that could go South for Democrats on this I’m too lazy to list them.

Valid point, but there is also a many things that could work out for the Democrats going into the 2020 election
 
Republicans refuse to remove Trump even though he's been outed as a criminal. That's pretty much it.

Maybe they refuse to remove him over bullshit lol.

Pelosi couldn’t get a single republican vote and that was BEFORE the WB’s name AND associations came out. And just last night we learn that the WB’s lawyer was caught calling for a coup in 2107. You get that? The WB’s lawyer is on record calling for a coup and he represents a person who is very plausibly not a WB but a leaker and a tool of the Deep State.

The reek and stench of this thing is just filtering down to voters. If Nancy couldn’t get a single House republican vote the first time—forget about it, after this.

Senate? Quit while your ahead.
 
Horse shit. They BAILED BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT THEY CANNOT SHOW CAUSE, and WILL BE SUBPOENAED THEMSELVES. DIPSHIT. HAVE SOME MORE KOOL-AID.


Very easy to read thank you.

And once again, now for the facts, and we didn't have to employ a travel site to support the facts:

"We regret Mr. Bolton’s decision not to appear voluntarily, but we have no interest in allowing the Administration to play rope-a-dope with us in the courts for months."

"There is no proper basis for a witness to sue the Congress in court to oppose a duly authorized congressional subpoena," a House Intelligence Committee official said Wednesday, adding that they do not expect to reissue the subpoena."

"Given the schedule of our impeachment hearings, a court process that leads to the dismissal of a flawed lawsuit would only result in delay, so we have withdrawn his subpoena."

https://thehill.com/policy/national...efforts-to-secure-bolton-testimony-as-part-of
 
Back
Top