#STFU Giulliani

Why would there be a check? The only check I know of legally is the 4th Amendment and he has not broken that.
what?
I'm talking about the scope and size. not probable cause for a warrant,but "reasonable suspicion" to investigate
 
what?
I'm talking about the scope and size. not probable cause for a warrant,but "reasonable suspicion" to investigate

So what legal limit is there on scope or size? What law limits that, I know of none! And why should there be one?
 
So what legal limit is there on scope or size? What law limits that, I know of none! And why should there be one?

Are you saying if the police catch me in a crime I can argue that they had no right to investigate me in the first place?
 
So what legal limit is there on scope or size? What law limits that, I know of none! And why should there be one?
Prosecutorial Investigations have a founding.
Mueller has a specific charter. Russian "connections and links" (collusion) to the Trump campaign

Why should he not be held to those limits, with an exception for exigent criminal activity ?
 
Prosecutorial Investigations have a founding.
Mueller has a specific charter. Russian "connections and links" (collusion) to the Trump campaign

Why should he not be held to those limits, with an exception for exigent criminal activity ?

Because there’s no law requiring him to be held to any such limit. Why do you want to limit what crimes he is allowed to investigate? Are you afraid he will find something?
 
Prosecutorial Investigations have a founding.
Mueller has a specific charter. Russian "connections and links" (collusion) to the Trump campaign

Why should he not be held to those limits, with an exception for exigent criminal activity ?

You forgot about the part that says, and anything else that turns up!
 
Because there’s no law requiring him to be held to any such limit. Why do you want to limit what crimes he is allowed to investigate? Are you afraid he will find something?
he cannot go fishing.But he's doing so.
why do I oppose a prosecutor who can investigate without reasonable suspicion?
ARE YOU SERIOUS??? :palm:
 
he cannot go fishing.But he's doing so.
why do I oppose a prosecutor who can investigate without reasonable suspicion?
ARE YOU SERIOUS??? :palm:

yes I’m serious, There is no such legal limit.

They are allowed to investigate anything and anyone they want.
 
I can remember times when a prosecutor would be upset about a guy getting off on charges so he would tell a police officer... hey follow that guy, I’ll bet he will commit another crime.
 
he cannot go fishing.But he's doing so.
why do I oppose a prosecutor who can investigate without reasonable suspicion?
ARE YOU SERIOUS??? :palm:

Of course he can go fishing.. Isn't it funny that Guiliani said Jarod Kushner was "disposable"? Trump ultimately turns on EVERYONE.
 
Where is that rule? I am a former prosecutor I know there is no such rule.
you are conflating police powers with a prosecutorial investigation.

The fact you think a prosecutor can open a case without reasonable suspicion of a crime is bone chilling Orwellianism
 
Back
Top