“Stop the Steal" rallies

[gfm7175]

This is like the fifth time I have seen the same anecdotal narrative, show us the source

Oh, and in life, you will run into instances where certain information is not presented exactly how you wish to see it in a concise internet link... It requires digging into various data and actually compiling it for yourself... Information is not always "pre-compiled" by someone else into a neat and easy-to-understand internet link... Not everything in life is handed to you on a quick to digest silver platter... Sometimes you need to put in the work for yourself.

When I quickly saw information presented to be about a "90% of the registered vote turned out in WI", I didn't take it at face value, even though it's information that is favorable to my case that this election is fraudulent. I went on the WI State website and looked up the number of registered voters, looked up the official vote count, and did the math for myself, and indeed it did turn out to be approx 90%...

I had also seen claims of over 100%, which I would've really loved to run with, but it used a lower # of registered voters than what there actually is... Although, who knows how many registered voters are actually real and living people who are residents of WI... Who knows how many names should be purged from the rolls... That alone bumps the 90% number a bit higher in actuality... Past WI elections have seen nowhere near 90% registered turnout.

 

[christiefan915]

Probability mathematics. Not a law. Mathematics. You are denying mathematics.

So you agree that people don't have to vote for down ballot candidates in an election. As an example, here in PA judges are elected, not appointed, and I don't vote for any of them.

 

[Althea]

trump said he would lock up Clinton for crimes, but was unable to find any evidence to present in court.

Nor did Issa. After several attempts.

 

[Legion]

Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, six U.S. states had or were implementing a state-wide mail-in ballot system. Oregon was the first to roll out in 2000, followed by Washington (2006), Utah (2012), Colorado (2014), California (2018) and Hawaii (2020). Oregon was the first state in the U.S. to move to a universal mail-in voting system when it passed with significant majority support. Its universal mail-in system goes further than many states in that it does not have any form of in-person polling places. Voters are sent their ballots in the mail and can either return them by mail or in drop boxes across the state. "Oregon’s system is very secure & produces some of the highest voter turnout rates in the country," Oregon Secretary of State Bev Clarno said in a tweet earlier this year. "As I’ve said before, our experience with vote-by-mail is a 20-year history of success."

Those aren't "only mail-in voting" states.

What's your excuse for the states that have had mail-in voting only for years?

Maybe you don't know what "only" means.

 

[gfm7175]

Right, just like there was "LOT" of evidence for the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy, Obama birther conspiracy, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, the "Deep State," Jeffrey Epstein, Vince Foster, Seth Rich, Trump Towers being bugged, illegals voting, PizzaGate, etc., etc., etc

There IS evidence of all that stuff... Denying evidence does not make it go away...

 

[Legion]

In PA judges are elected, not appointed, and I don't vote for any of them.

I don't believe you.

 

[Legion]

I'm not committing to any happiness yet, but Carville gets info from cohorts that we don't. Given that the counties that are still due to report are typically Blue, I've had a good feeling about Ga.. It's almost the opposite in AZ, but I think Biden will eek out a win by less than 10k votes.

Appeal to authority.

 

[Althea]

Oh, and in life, you will run into instances where certain information is not presented exactly how you wish to see it in a concise internet link... It requires digging into various data and actually compiling it for yourself... Information is not always "pre-compiled" by someone else into a neat and easy-to-understand internet link... Not everything in life is handed to you on a quick to digest silver platter... Sometimes you need to put in the work for yourself.

When I quickly saw information presented to be about a "90% of the registered vote turned out in WI", I didn't take it at face value, even though it's information that is favorable to my case that this election is fraudulent. I went on the WI State website and looked up the number of registered voters, looked up the official vote count, and did the math for myself, and indeed it did turn out to be approx 90%...

I had also seen claims of over 100%, which I would've really loved to run with, but it used a lower # of registered voters than what there actually is... Although, who knows how many registered voters are actually real and living people who are residents of WI... Who knows how many names should be purged from the rolls... That alone bumps the 90% number a bit higher in actuality... Past WI elections have seen nowhere near 90% registered turnout.

WI has same day registration, and there were no counties with 90% turnout.

This WILL age well.

 

[gfm7175]

So you can't give us the source, for all we know you are just echoing something you heard or saw in some nobody's tweet. The look it up yourself deflection is a dead giveaway

I JUST GAVE YOU THE SOURCES, dumbass...

Not everything is presented on a nifty internet link that is instantly viewable... Sometimes you need to put in the effort yourself to compile particular information...

 

[Legion]

How many people will die?

In leftist rioting?

How many businesses will be destroyed?

Because of a $15 minimum wage?

 

[gfm7175]

#sharpiegate, lol. What a big fat lie.

"Experts say it is rare but not impossible that filling in an oval with a Sharpie marker could cause a "bleed-through" that would cause a voting machine to initially not read a ballot. But in some states, election officials prefer Sharpies because they lead to ballots being processed more smoothly. And there is no evidence election workers gave out Sharpies with the aim to invalidate ballots, or that any widespread spoiling of Sharpie-penned ballots occurred.

Matthew Weil, director of the Elections Project at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said he is "not aware of cases where an election official said the Sharpie was fine and then the ballot was invalidated. Of course, every machine is different. But when the election officials themselves are saying this isn’t a problem, I’m going to believe them."

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...e-sharpiegate-no-evidence-plot-use-pens-canc/

Politifact instantly dismissed on sight. I do not accept Politifact as a source. You will need to come up with another source.

 

[Legion]

There were no counties with 90% turnout.

Weren't there?

 

[gfm7175]

Quote the law that says voters must vote for down ballot candidates in an election.

You COMPLETELY missed the point of my post... You don't question the fact that 100k Biden voters in a single district wouldn't even bother to vote down ballot?

 

[Legion]

You COMPLETELY missed the point of my post... You don't question the fact that 100k Biden voters in a single district wouldn't even bother to vote down ballot?

I'll need to see evidence that it happened, personally.

 

[christiefan915]

Politifact instantly dismissed on sight. I do not accept Politifact as a source. You will need to come up with another source.

That's your problem. I gave a source with facts, you gave opinion. Your desperation is palpable.

https://tulsaworld.com/news/nationa...cle_5529dbad-e31a-5159-b1eb-607232c926bf.html
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/pol...alidate-arizona-ballots-debunked/2705410/?amp
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2020/11/05/trust-index-do-sharpie-pens-invalidate-ballots/

 

[Legion]

Politifact instantly dismissed on sight. I do not accept Politifact as a source. You will need to come up with another source.

Genetic fallacy.

 

[Althea]

Thanks for pointing that out. Here the Trumptards are saying "Hurry up with the Counting Votes "in N. Carolina and Georgia, but yet screaming"Stop the counting" in PA.

WHICH IS IT TRUMPTARDS?

Michigan too, because Detroit was about to report. trump was BEHIND at the time. Go figure.

 

[StoneByStone]

There are many fraudulent votes there, too. There are also issues regarding the forced use of sharpie pens, and there's a pending lawsuit regarding that. There will likely be future lawsuits...

Oh, I know. If the votes are for Trump, they must be counted. If they're for Biden, they were fraudulent.

 

[Althea]

With all the mail voting what did you expect lol?

Think of how much smother things would go with a national voter ID law. No room for malarkey and no court battles. This thing would be over by now.

Not sure you’d like the results though. Btw, how is it possible that Trump recorded more minority votes than any republican since 1960; Republicans out performed democrats in both Houses—and this election is even close?

Something doesn’t add up.

Why aren't they suing Fla/Texas for fraud? Surely there had to be rampant fraud there too?

 

[Althea]

What doesn't add up?

How about the Dem once again winning the popular vote by MILLIONS, but Dems not winning the Senate and actually losing seats in the House?

Gee, maybe a lot of voters don't go straight party-line down the ticket, like the partisans here. What do you think....is that a possibility?

Or they didn't bother with down ballot, which would explain the horrid Senate response. Some Red states did away with straight ticket voting. People would have to vote in each race instead of just choosing DEM/REP across the ballot.