Study Suggests That Wimpier Men Hold Liberal Views

RockX

Banned
[h=1]Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views[/h]
  • Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution
  • Link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in our ancestors
  • Strength was a proxy for ability to defend or acquire resources
  • There is no link between women's physical strength and political views

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.

Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.

The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behaviour today.

Professor Petersen said: ‘While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always been with our species.’

In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.

With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesised that upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.

The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.


In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html


LOL

A perfect example...

obama-pitch-baseball-april-2010.jpg


 
Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views


  • Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution
  • Link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in our ancestors
  • Strength was a proxy for ability to defend or acquire resources
  • There is no link between women's physical strength and political views

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.

Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.

The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behaviour today.

Professor Petersen said: ‘While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always been with our species.’

In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.

With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesised that upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.

The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.


In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html


LOL

A perfect example...

obama-pitch-baseball-april-2010.jpg



I suspect that you could also find an inverse correlation between brains and brawn as well. Have you stopped going out queer bashing now?
 
it all comes back to the zombie apocalypse. in the zombie apocalypse the weak know they are shit out of luck. So they wish to consolidate all their power right now while they have the chance under the pretext of a "civilized society"
 
Forrest Gump.

I always thought the running scene in that flick was a little unrealistic. I mean, even the best marathon runners wouldn't be able to run for weeks on end, all day.

I can picture the scene but I'm not doing well figuring out its application to this article.
 
You white trash muscle heads are more likely to be bowlers and extremely proud of you high school graduation.
Liberals are more likely too have advanced degrees, play golf and tennis!
Guess which group has the hotter & smarter wives?
 
when you depend on muscle over brainpower you are being the stupid that Im talking about.

Both can come in handy, but I don't believe there is a political affiliation and I know for a fact that there are plenty of muscle heads who are quite intelligent...regardless of what some flabby men might like to believe!
 
it all comes back to the zombie apocalypse. in the zombie apocalypse the weak know they are shit out of luck. So they wish to consolidate all their power right now while they have the chance under the pretext of a "civilized society"

Yeah, but, like, the smart people will just hurry up and become zombies and feed off of meathead brains. I mean, what's so bad about being a zombie?
 
Back
Top