Super-liberal Seattle putting up WALLS to keep out homeless AMERICANS!!!

I don't see much difference between that and Republicans tricking working class folks to vote against their interest with wedge issues.

"Against their interests", as if freebies are what these folks are interested in. :nono:
 
STFU ... after the Republican display last night ...

Deficits Don't Matter :laugh:

No. What the fuck are you going to do about it, BOY?

Liberals want to put up walls in Seattle to keep those they want out from getting places yet the same Liberals refuse to support a wall designed to keep out illegals. Proof they want more Democrat voters with the illegals.
 
No. What the fuck are you going to do about it, BOY?

Liberals want to put up walls in Seattle to keep those they want out from getting places yet the same Liberals refuse to support a wall designed to keep out illegals. Proof they want more Democrat voters with the illegals.


Are you kidding ... Let Trump be Trump and sit back and watch the Republican Party Ass-Fuck itself.

Girl
 
Are you kidding ... Let Trump be Trump and sit back and watch the Republican Party Ass-Fuck itself.

Girl

Just keep lying to yourself that all you leftwingers don't support illegals coming here for the votes. It makes you feel better and look foolish at the same time.

Maybe one of those illegals that you love so much will pull a Kate Steinle on you. It would be no loss to society.
 
Just keep lying to yourself that all you leftwingers don't support illegals coming here for the votes. It makes you feel better and look foolish at the same time.

Maybe one of those illegals that you love so much will pull a Kate Steinle on you. It would be no loss to society.


You're boring me ... go away little boy.
 
I don't see much difference between that and Republicans tricking working class folks to vote against their interest with wedge issues.

When one candidate promises to put coal miners and companies out of business they saw it as in their interest to vote against that candidate.

They also saw it as in their interest to vote against those who thought they were being "tricked" to vote for the candidate of their choice. A condescending attitude toward any group usually backfires.
 
And what has Trump done to fulfill his promises?

Nothing, but he did not promise to put people out of jobs. Politics is mostly about emotions, not kept campaign promises and voters cannot act on 2016 promises until 2020.

The point was about whether they were voting in their own interest and they had reason to perceive that they were. Too many think voting in your own interest means economic benefits while voting research tells us they want someone to "share our values."
 
And you're the traitor who wants to let the whole world dump their poor and sick and criminal on america.

No, we want them because they are hard working, seek the American dream and are less likely to be a criminal than you.

Don't let the facts get in your way, nativist.


ABSTRACT
The perception that immigration adversely affects crime rates led to legislation in the 1990s that particularly
increased punishment of criminal aliens. In fact, immigrants have much lower institutionalization (incarceration)
rates than the native born - on the order of one-fifth the rate of natives. More recently arrived immigrants
have the lowest relative incarceration rates, and this difference increased from 1980 to 2000. We examine
whether the improvement in immigrants' relative incarceration rates over the last three decades is linked
to increased deportation, immigrant self-selection, or deterrence. Our evidence suggests that deportation
does not drive the results. Rather, the process of migration selects individuals who either have lower
criminal propensities or are more responsive to deterrent effects than the average native. Immigrants
who were already in the country reduced their relative institutionalization probability over the decades;
and the newly arrived immigrants in the 1980s and 1990s seem to be particularly unlikely to be involved
in criminal activity, consistent with increasingly positive selection along this dimension.
Kristin F. Butcher
Department of Economics
Wellesley College
106 Central Street
Wellesley, MA 02481-8203
kbutcher@wellesley.edu
Anne Morrison Piehl
Department of Economics
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
New Jersey Hall
75 Hamilton Street
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1248
and NBER
apiehl@economics.rutgers.edu


http://www.nber.org/papers/w13229.pdf
 
Back
Top