Supercandy defends Secretary Clinton's argument!

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Superfreak said:
US... but what does it matter? We already KNOW they covered it up. Having another ten people come out and say "they covered it up" doesn't change that.
Click to expand...

Supercandy on why we should not be investigating or looking into the lies told about Pat Tillman's death!

Funny, when its a Democrat accused of lying after someone's death he seems to think that argument is awful.

Hoisted on his own petard.
 
Jarod said:
Supercandy on why we should not be investigating or looking into the lies told about Pat Tillman's death!

Funny, when its a Democrat accused of lying after someone's death he seems to think that argument is awful.

Hoisted on his own petard.
Click to expand...

Again douche bag... show us a fucking link to the conversation.
 
Jarod said:
Supercandy on why we should not be investigating or looking into the lies told about Pat Tillman's death!

Funny, when its a Democrat accused of lying after someone's death he seems to think that argument is awful.

Hoisted on his own petard.
Click to expand...

How were they lies dumbass? Why do you like falsley using tragedies to further a partisan political agenda?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
He's busily looking for some loophole he can use to deny what he himself said.

Prepare for some WORLD CLASS spinning of the facts from SF.
Click to expand...


Wait for it, its coming...

Today may go down as one of the most comical days in JPP history! Since Dixie was banned anyway!
 
Obviously Dick Cheney shot Pat Tillman on a hunting expedition and used Halliburton spooks to cover it all up. :rolleyes:
 
Hillary said it didn't matter what the reason was for their deaths. Did I say any such thing about Tillman?

No. We found out a month or so after his death that it was friendly fire. We knew it was friendly fire. We knew they covered it up and why.

Let me guess... because we used a similar phrase you think that makes the two the same?

Thanks for once again proving you are an idiot Garud.
 
Jarod said:
Wait for it, its coming...

Today may go down as one of the most comical days in JPP history! Since Dixie was banned anyway!
Click to expand...


Boy howdy!

All them partisan Righties so eager to whine about the manufactured Benghazi scandal sure ran from this like a pack of scalded dogs!
 
Jarod said:
Supercandy on why we should not be investigating or looking into the lies told about Pat Tillman's death!

Funny, when its a Democrat accused of lying after someone's death he seems to think that argument is awful.

Hoisted on his own petard.
Click to expand...


Nice! I wonder this will be moved to Off Topic since only Republicans, like grind, are allowed to start threads about posts from the past and directed at a person in Current Events.
 
My personal opinion is we need to worry about today and how to fix it and not worry about the past that we cant change.
Im a registered independent so I can say that both parties waste all their times telling each other they suck, we need alot more bipartisanship and get something done
 
Superfreak said:
Hillary said it didn't matter what the reason was for their deaths. Did I say any such thing about Tillman?

No. We found out a month or so after his death that it was friendly fire. We knew it was friendly fire. We knew they covered it up and why.

Let me guess... because we used a similar phrase you think that makes the two the same?

Thanks for once again proving you are an idiot Garud.
Click to expand...

You did not want to find out who was responsible? Why? What was done about it? What was done to ensure it not happen again? What you could do to blame the Secretary of Defense for his culpability?

Why did it matter Candy?
 
Yoda said:
My personal opinion is we need to worry about today and how to fix it and not worry about the past that we cant change.
Im a registered independent so I can say that both parties waste all their times telling each other they suck, we need alot more bipartisanship and get something done
Click to expand...

I agree with that except that part of fixing what is wrong today is to expose false outrage and end the games. I only dug this up after Conservatives claimed they would have been just as outraged if anyone else had lied after someone died.

Supercandy claimed this was a special case and not false outrage that President Obama had gone beyond the pale.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Who admitted to a cover up in the Tillman case?
Click to expand...

I stated that it was clearly a cover up. The media stated it was clearly a cover up. Everyone knew it was a cover up.

So for Garud to be correct in stating that my comment on Tillmans case is the same as Hillary, then Hillary would have had to admit it was a cover up. That the Obama admin had lied about what happened.
 
Jarod said:
I agree with that except that part of fixing what is wrong today is to expose false outrage and end the games. I only dug this up after Conservatives claimed they would have been just as outraged if anyone else had lied after someone died.

Supercandy claimed this was a special case and not false outrage that President Obama had gone beyond the pale.
Click to expand...

What the fuck are you rambling about? Where did I say it was a special case? You keep changing the subject in some vain attempt at a gotcha. I mocked you for claiming that Reps want Obama to call everything bad a terrorist act. The only two instances you have were ACTUAL TERRORIST ATTACKS.

I said the Obama admin tried to pretend the attack was simply a spontaneous reaction to a video. They did so for over a week after the attack.

Then you jumped onto your nonsense that Hillary's comment was the same as what I stated regarding Tillman. They are not the same.

So what will you jump to next moron?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top