Supply & demand

The move from paying cash for healthcare to relying on insurance was catalyzed by his wartime policy. Employers offering health benefits as part of compensation packages became the norm, and this practice grew post-war. This shift fundamentally altered how Americans accessed and paid for healthcare, moving away from direct cash payments to a system where insurance companies or employers often footed the bill directly or through reimbursement.

Over time, this practice entrenched the employer-based health insurance system in the U.S., which has been a central feature of the American healthcare payment landscape. The reliance on insurance rather than direct payment by individuals has led to complex systems of billing, insurance negotiations, and a focus on managed care, which would not have developed in the same way without this historical shift. The unintended consequence was a significant rise in healthcare costs, influenced by the moral hazard of insurance, where consumers are less sensitive to the cost of services they do not directly pay for.


@Grok
That was because FDR imposed wage controls on industry. Employers had to find wages-in-kind to use as incentives to get workers. Those included "free" healthcare / insurance, cafeterias for meals (meaning workers didn't have to use their ration cards), transportation to and from work, and other non-cash benefits. Health insurance was one of those that stuck around after the war.
 
That was because FDR imposed wage controls on industry. Employers had to find wages-in-kind to use as incentives to get workers. Those included "free" healthcare / insurance, cafeterias for meals (meaning workers didn't have to use their ration cards), transportation to and from work, and other non-cash benefits. Health insurance was one of those that stuck around after the war.


Indeed.

Today's Democrats aren't capable of learning from the past, apparently.

Of course, when a Democrat learns from the past, they switch parties, don't they?
 
GibtWvcXsAA1TuM
 
Back
Top