“Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed”

archives

Verified User
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken.

“The justices’ response on Tuesday struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices’ travel and private business transactions”

“Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor and legal ethics expert, said everything the justices detailed Tuesday evening about ethics was essentially outlined in Chief Justice John Roberts’ annual year-end report from 2011, more than a decade ago.”

“They’re basically saying ... What we’ve been doing is just fine.”

“Thomas has for more than two decades accepted luxury trips nearly every year from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. Gorsuch sold property which he disclosed the sale but omitted that the property was purchased by a person whose firm frequently has cases before the high court. Roberts’ wife raised ethical concerns that she was paid large sums for placing lawyers at firms that appear before the court.”

“The justices seem to be utterly clueless about the problem they have ... They’re in a bubble apparently. They don’t see what a big problem they have”

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08

Every Court in the US, from local to Federal, has a defined code of conduct with an authority to monitor complaints except the Supreme Court, they supposedly consider themselves above everyone else. They appear totally unconnected with the people who are effected by their decisions, which explains some of the flat out stupid comments some of them make

They are a separate branch, but they are also part of the Federal Gov’t, and as I noted, the only entity within that Government, and even their own branch, without an enforceable code of ethics
 
The Supreme Court Justices are the final arbiters of ethics and they are blowing you off, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.
 
so even the three liberal women justices told you that they are not broken and operating completely within their constitutional ethics and guidelines.

so who are you going to believe? the judicial experts who sit on that bench? or your lying eyes and ears?
 
so even the three liberal women justices told you that they are not broken and operating completely within their constitutional ethics and guidelines.

so who are you going to believe? the judicial experts who sit on that bench? or your lying eyes and ears?

Their also wrong, and they may be judicial experts, although that is also debatable given the last four appointees were approved on a majority vote, but being a judicial expert doesn’t excuse them from being held accountable for what they do outside of the Court or its relation to the cases infront of them
 
No their not, legalities, not ethics, they can’t even recognize their own lack of ethics

Read your own link, Anchovies:

"The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken."

Nothing is broken, don't panic, Anchovies.

The three women on the Court who always vote against the Constitution get a pass, too.
 
Their also wrong, and they may be judicial experts, although that is also debatable given the last four appointees were approved on a majority vote, but being a judicial expert doesn’t excuse them from being held accountable for what they do outside of the Court or its relation to the cases infront of them

so all of your beliefs that experts opinions deliver the most weight and need to be trusted over anyone else only applies when YOU agree with them? Because every single one of those judicial experts sitting on that bench told you that you're wrong.

again, who are you going to believe? the experts? or only your beliefs and opinions?
 
Read your own link, Anchovies:

"The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken."

Nothing is broken, don't panic, Anchovies.

The three women on the Court who always vote against the Constitution get a pass, too.

Are daft “earl,” they are passing judgement on their own ethics which we’ve seen in recent days isn’t all that copacetic
 
so all of your beliefs that experts opinions deliver the most weight and need to be trusted over anyone else only applies when YOU agree with them? Because every single one of those judicial experts sitting on that bench told you that you're wrong.

again, who are you going to believe? the experts? or only your beliefs and opinions?

Irrelevant, as I noted the three women Justices as just as guilty, and those experts siting their are not experts on ethnics, which is obviously apparent in Roberts letter
 
Are daft “earl,” they are passing judgement on their own ethics which we’ve seen in recent days isn’t all that copacetic

In terms of pecking order, God is the only one above the justices on the Supreme Court.

And (sic) He hasn't spoken.

I'm sure though that He agrees with the Supremes.
 
Last edited:
Irrelevant, as I noted the three women Justices as just as guilty, and those experts siting their are not experts on ethnics, which is obviously apparent in Roberts letter

their expertise and positions mark them as highly professional.............this is a position that nearly every leftist here takes when debating the statements and opinions of left wing officials. You cannot reconcile that a person of such expertise and professionalism on the court is also a completely unethical hosebag robbing the american people. the two are diametrically opposed.

again, who are you going to believe? the experts? or your own personal beliefs and opinions?
 
Time to increase the size of the court and to put some financial regulations on their personal activities
 
In terms of pecking order, God is the only one above the justices on the Supreme Court.

And (sic) he hasn't spoken.

I'm sure though that He agrees with the Supremes.

Whoa, that is out there, so in your world you have God, and the Supreme Court a notch below Him/Her, and then everyone/everything else to follow. And I guess that means if one doesn’t believe in God, the Supreme Court becomes the Almighty

You got to get out more “earl,” a lot more
 
Back
Top