Supreme Court sides with religious parents who want to avoid LGBTQ+ books in public schools

[Earl]

So full of hate.

At least you are honest.

Yes, I am honest snd you are not.

 

[Earl]

This decision clearly demonstrates that Ketanji Brown Jackson is grossly unqualified to be on the Supreme Court.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Should children have access to books that adults can't read out loud in front of a town meeting?

The Bible?

LOL Agreed. There's mass murder, slavery, incest and adultery in the Bible. Heather has Two Mommies only talks about a little girl learning that all families are different.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

1. Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe
   Reasons: LGBTQIA+ content, claimed to be sexually explicit
2. All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson
   Reasons: LGBTQIA+ content, claimed to be sexually explicit
3. This Book is Gay by Juno Dawson
   Reasons: LGBTQIA+ content, sex education, claimed to be sexually explicit
4. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
   Reasons: Claimed to be sexually explicit, LGBTQIA+ content, rape, drugs, profanity
5. Flamer by Mike Curato
   Reasons: LGBTQIA+ content, claimed to be sexually explicit
6. The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
   Reasons: Depiction of rape, incest, claimed to be sexually explicit, EDI content
7. (TIE) Tricks by Ellen Hopkins
   Reasons: Claimed to be sexually explicit, drugs, depiction of rape, LGBTQIA+ content
8. (TIE) Me and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews
   Reasons: Claimed to be sexually explicit, profanity
9. Let’s Talk About It by Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan
   Reasons: Claimed to be sexually explicit, sex education, LGBTQIA+ content
10. Sold by Patricia McCormick
    Reasons: Claimed to be sexually explicit, depiction of rape

This is what the far left Democratic Socialist groomers want in 6 year old classes.

I'm curious, ex-Captain Earl, please quote me what you consider to be "sexually explicit" in either of the first three books. Just one passage is fine. If you can't do it, be honest enough to admit you haven't read any of them.

FWIW, I support age-appropriate sections of public libraries. Unlike the "Little House on the Prairie" and one-room school houses, modern schools are, indeed, divided into "age-appropriate" sections.

 

[Grokmaster]

Obviously the right of parents.

 

[Nordberg]

Lgbtq books? Now books have sexual orientation? The books would be harmless. Did you Trumpys recognize in school that there were kids with different orientations than you? How did that harm you? Would reading a book about their difficulties in society have made you gay?
What is more sexual damaging than Catholic priests living and learning in an all-male organization, that suppressed the women in a nunnery, making them live in all-female schools. How more destructive can you get? Ask the altar boys who lived through the messes you religious people allowed and covered up.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

The school board originally allowed parents to opt out their children but then reversed course, saying that no opt-outs would be permitted and that parents would not even be notified when the storybooks were read.

Never allow Democrats to control your children.

And yet you bow and pray and teach your kids the same to inanimate stone objects

 

[ADreamOfLiberty]

I have an amazing idea: If parents don't want their kids to go to a school, they those parents don't have to pay for that school.