Those damned Yorkies are pretty vicious too!I hear German Sheppards have a higher rate of violence than Pittbulls. Also, those cute little Golden Retrievers actually have a higher rate than one would expect by simply looking at them.
We have those kind or ordanances too in some states and regions. That doesn't make what I said any less true.The government thinks otherwise, the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 bans Pit Bulls completely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991
True, if they were to take away the property and assets from the Royals that belong to the British people and put that money into the economy a whole lot of people would be better off. I don't know how in the modern day anyone can respect the notion that anyone is born superior.You guys should spend more time figuring out how to ban the royal family and less time murdering dogs.
The government thinks otherwise, the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 bans Pit Bulls completely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991
The government thinks otherwise, the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 bans Pit Bulls completely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_Dogs_Act_1991
Your government also mandates licenses to own a TV. Their whole 'methodology' for determining danger was/is absurd in every regard and completely devoid of scientific evidence.
The hoary old chestnut of the TV licence again, it is not a licence to own a TV so much as a way to pay for the BBC. It is a small price to pay to not have to suffer ads. I agree it is anachronistic but any other system would end up like PBS in the US which is always subject to calls for its funds to be scrapped.
Have you trained them to be silent when someone approaches?that reminds me. i've been needing to install a set of security cameras in my house to make sure I get pictures of the looks of terror on faces, should any idiot be stupid enough to break in to my house and come face to face with 4 pit bulls and a great dane.
Have you trained them to be silent when someone approaches?
Here are some more example of the almighty wisdom of Britain;
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I couldn't imagine PAYING for content such as this...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
True, if they were to take away the property and assets from the Royals that belong to the British people and put that money into the economy a whole lot of people would be better off. I don't know how in the modern day anyone can respect the notion that anyone is born superior.
left behind walkie talkies and a receipt for gum and a video game,
The hoary old chestnut of the TV licence again, it is not a licence to own a TV so much as a way to pay for the BBC. It is a small price to pay to not have to suffer ads. I agree it is anachronistic but any other system would end up like PBS in the US which is always subject to calls for its funds to be scrapped.
the government also thinks that I affect interstate commerce by growing a weed in my backyard![]()
i can see that, like I can see how my use of strawberry jam affects the bottom line of grape vineyard owners.It effects interstate commerce by taking off from the bottom line of private prison operators.
How do you just forget stuff like that in the middle of a burglary? Why would you even bring receipts on such a sojourn?
How do you just forget stuff like that in the middle of a burglary? Why would you even bring receipts on such a sojourn?