Taliban warns of 'consequences' if Biden extends withdrawal deadline

Nordberg said:
Your bigotry is showing. The Taliban has been watching us pull out over 30,000 people so far. Did anyone think that could happen? This is going very well. I do not know if Biden is seeking an extension. The Taliban should welcome it. They are getting rid of problematic people.
Click to expand...

You're delusional.
 
Phantasmal said:
Why do you think Trump never completed his mission!
Click to expand...

Well for one- HE WAS FIRED BY THE AMERICAN VOTERS!

When Biden was sworn in- there were only 2500 troops left in Afghanistan. And the Taliban had already had a year in the their planning.

And it didn't help for Trump to tell the Taliban what we intended to do, making deals with them, like letting 5,000 or more terrorists out of jail to help the Taliban in their taking over the country, and thus the Taliban letting 17,000 criminals, many of them terrorists, out of Afghanistan jails after they did take over the countryside.

THIS IS WHY THE UNITED STATES NEVER MADE DEALS WITH TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS BEFORE TRUMP WENT AGAINST ANOTHER AMERICAN NORM, AND GAVE THEM ALL THE DETAILS OF OUR PULLOUT WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN TOP SECRET UNDER A BIDEN PLAN HAD WE THE CHOICE!

GIVEN ALL OF THOSE HUGE MISTAKES BEFORE BIDEN WAS EVEN SWORN IN- WTF DOES ANYONE EXPECT THIS PULLOUT TO BE- SOME KIND OF CELEBRATION VICTORY PARTY AND TICKER TAPE PARADE DOWN 5th AVENUE?

GIVEN ALL OF TRUMP'S MISTAKES OF MEDDLING IN THE BRINGING THE TROOPS HOME AND REVEALING ALL OF OUR PLANS, AND TOP SECRETS, AND MAKING DEALS WITH THESE TERRORISTS- AND LEAVING ONLY 2500 troops there to defend the entire country- and many of them are paper pushers- THE PULLOUT HAS ACTUALLY GONE BETTER THAN I EXPECTED! I expected it to look like hell- AND I WAS RIGHT!

NOW HEAR THIS- 2500 troops left there by TRUMP- T R U M P!

ADD 5,000 TALIBAN terrorist prisoners let out of jail by TRUMP! T R U M P!

DO THE MATH ON THAT ALONE PEOPLE!

WTF DO THESE TRUMPTARDS EXPECT IT TO LOOK LIKE- A FUCKING PICNIC!

Their response has been pathetic, at best, if not Laughable.

Blaming Biden for things TRUMP ALREADY FUCKED UP!
 
Last edited:
BidenPresident said:
Congress has no power to authorize military force. A meaningless gesture.
Click to expand...

you are an idiot


115 STAT. 224 PUBLIC LAW 107–40—SEPT. 18, 2001
Public Law 107–40
107th Congress

Joint Resolution
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible
for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were
committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that
the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect
United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign
policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence;
and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary
threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United
States; and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to
take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism
against the United States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Authorization for
Use of Military Force’’.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—That the President is authorized to use all
necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed,
or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,
or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent
any future acts of international terrorism against the United States
by such nations, organizations or persons.
(b) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.—Consistent with
section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress
declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the
War Powers Resolution


https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ40/PLAW-107publ40.pdf


Congressional authorizations for the use of military force allow the president to lead a military campaign consistent with the scope defined by Congress. The War Powers Resolution was an attempt to restore the original constitutional balance on war powers between the legislative and executive branches. But in practice, it has afforded the president greater latitude to use military force at the outset of a conflict.

https://www.americanprogress.org/is...authorizations-for-the-use-of-military-force/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top