TAMPON TIM IS A MONSTER

D

Dachshund

Verified User
Donald TRUMP has accuse Tampon Tim Walz of supporting infanticide.

Walz has always flatly denied this.

So I checked it out for myself.

Turns out that in 2023 when he was Governor of Minnesota, Walz supported an omnibus Health Bill that radically changed his state's abortion laws.

If you read this section of the Bill ( i.e. the section on abortion) carefully, you will see for yourself that it DOES clearly legalise infanticide. It also legalises late- term abortion all the way up to the 9th month of a pregnancy.

IMO both pregnant women who request, and, the obstetricians who conduct abortions in the last trimester, are (morally) evil. Ditto those who permit infanticide to be carried out.

So Trump is correct and Walz is lying through his teeth (nothing new for a Democrat).

When Kamala Harris vetted Walz for the role of her Vice Presidential running mate, I'm sure she would have asked him about his position on abortion. The conclusion I draw is that clearly Kamala has no problem at all with legalising abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month of pregnancy, or, if a baby is "born alive" after a botched abortion legally permitting it to be intentionally "left to die" without medical care.



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound
 
Goyboy said:
He is excommunicated. And that's final!
Click to expand...
I don't understand your remark (above) ? Something to do with Walz being excommunicated from the Catholic Church for his support of more liberal abortion laws, is it? I didn't know that Tampon -Tim was a Catholic ?



The point I was making is that whether or not an American citizen is a Catholic or, say, a Protestant of some denomination, or an atheist or an agnostic; if s/he is normal, reasonable, civil adult who is able to function competently in mainstream society, then the fact that infanticide is legal in Minnesota will appall his moral conscience.



Moral conscience is the little silent "voice" in your head that tells when something in right/good or wrong/bad in moral situation. For instance if I see a neighbour mercilessly thrashing his small, pet, dog with a whip or mistreating it in some other extremely cruel manner, my moral conscience will instantly tells me that what my neighbour is doing is wrong/bad and ought be stopped as quickly as possible, etc.




The average, civilised, rational American would be, I believe, morally outraged by the existence of a state (Minnesota) abortion law that make it legal for baby who is "born live" following a BOTCHED abortion to be placed in a crib, etc; and intentlonally left to die by being deprived of any life-sustaining medical care . That the mother of such of child could consent to this horrific murder of her own child does my head in. Just the though of it utterly shocks my moral conscience, which tells me that this act is evil (profoundly morally bad). Likewise the surgical termination of a pregnancy at 7, 8 or 9 months. Ask yourself if you would take up an offer the personally watch an abortionist tear an 8 -month - old foetus to pieces with his scalpel and surgical pliers and clamps. The physical GORE would be horrible to witness, but what is "beyond the pale" is that it extinguishing the life of a human being, a life that had infinite potentials, and was something "sacred" in its own right.




If you are a Christian you understand that your (moral) conscience is kind of like the voice of God , and it is usually to to warn you NOT to perform a particular act or behaviour (because it is wrongful and breaks the law/s God has set for how human should /ought behave in those situation where there is a right and a wrong thing to do/way to behave.




Finally, in my opinion a mother who consents to infanticide and the abortionist who intentionally and deliberately allows the "born alive" baby from a botched abortion are both evil human beings. Likewise women who arrange to have a healthy foetus they are carrying surgically aborted in the last trimester of pregnancy, and the abortionist who agrees to "eliminate" such a foetus are both (morally) evil person.




The word "EVIL" interestingly comes from the old Anglo Saxon word "EYFEL" For the old Anglo-Saxons, "EYFEL" meant "BEYOND", an in beyond the wooden fence barriers the farmers build around their land, or more generally speaking beyond some finite limit, like beyond the official boundaries of a football pitch. The word EVIL that we still use today was derived from "EYFEL" in the sense that an evil act or behaviour is beyond the limits of normal human reason. For example, the horrific torture and murder and cannibalism of victims by a serial killer like Jeffrey Dahmer is impossible for ordinary people to understand, they are unable to know what his reasons were for committing the unspeakable acts that he did When a person asks "What drove Dahmer to do what he did"? What were the reasons he decided to do what he did?" Why did he commit such appalling crimes" ? He or she cannot find any rational purpose - any cogent reason - for Jeffrey Dahmer doing what he did; and if there was a reason then it is "EYFEL" - BEYOND the limits,, BEYOND the pale of normal human understanding. Or in modern-day English, it is EVIL.





That a woman would intentionally allow her baby who was "born alive" after surviving a botched abortion to be left to slowly die for want of medical care is something I cannot understand using my reason. I simply cannot comprehend how a mother could do this. It is BEYOND ("eyfel" my ken, so I call it evil. The same thing goes for abortions performed in the final trimester of pregnancy, how a woman could choose to do this is BEYOND me; it is "Eyfel" or in today's English, "Evil."





If we grant that America is still a nation whose dominant culture is Western culture and its legal system is still mostly based on upholding the precepts of Judeo-Christian moral law, why isn't Tim Walz (the current, DEMOCRAT Vice Presidential candidate) called to account for the radical, new, state abortion laws he supported as GOVERNOR of Minnesota in the 2023, omnibus Health Bill that was passed; namely, the legalisation of infanticide (as defined above) and the legalisation of abortion from conception, up to and including, the 9th month of pregnancy. Also, and finally, why has Walz not be called to account for lying about this legislation on national television.





Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound !!
 
Dachshund said:
Donald TRUMP has accuse Tampon Tim Walz of supporting infanticide.

Walz has always flatly denied this.

So I checked it out for myself.

Turns out that in 2023 when he was Governor of Minnesota, Walz supported an omnibus Health Bill that radically changed his state's abortion laws.

If you read this section of the Bill ( i.e. the section on abortion) carefully, you will see for yourself that it DOES clearly legalise infanticide. It also legalises late- term abortion all the way up to the 9th month of a pregnancy.

IMO both pregnant women who request, and, the obstetricians who conduct abortions in the last trimester, are (morally) evil. Ditto those who permit infanticide to be carried out.

So Trump is correct and Walz is lying through his teeth (nothing new for a Democrat).

When Kamala Harris vetted Walz for the role of her Vice Presidential running mate, I'm sure she would have asked him about his position on abortion. The conclusion I draw is that clearly Kamala has no problem at all with legalising abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month of pregnancy, or, if a baby is "born alive" after a botched abortion legally permitting it to be intentionally "left to die" without medical care.



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound
Click to expand...

"TAMPON TIM", that sure sounds like grade school level to me; apparently you're just not smart enough to post anything of significance. ​

 
Dachshund said:
Donald TRUMP has accuse Tampon Tim Walz of supporting infanticide.

Walz has always flatly denied this.

So I checked it out for myself.

Turns out that in 2023 when he was Governor of Minnesota, Walz supported an omnibus Health Bill that radically changed his state's abortion laws.

If you read this section of the Bill ( i.e. the section on abortion) carefully, you will see for yourself that it DOES clearly legalise infanticide. It also legalises late- term abortion all the way up to the 9th month of a pregnancy.

IMO both pregnant women who request, and, the obstetricians who conduct abortions in the last trimester, are (morally) evil. Ditto those who permit infanticide to be carried out.

So Trump is correct and Walz is lying through his teeth (nothing new for a Democrat).

When Kamala Harris vetted Walz for the role of her Vice Presidential running mate, I'm sure she would have asked him about his position on abortion. The conclusion I draw is that clearly Kamala has no problem at all with legalising abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month of pregnancy, or, if a baby is "born alive" after a botched abortion legally permitting it to be intentionally "left to die" without medical care.



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound
Click to expand...

Cite the actual verbiage. Or go back under your rock.
 
Dachshund said:
Donald TRUMP has accuse Tampon Tim Walz of supporting infanticide.

Walz has always flatly denied this.

So I checked it out for myself.

Turns out that in 2023 when he was Governor of Minnesota, Walz supported an omnibus Health Bill that radically changed his state's abortion laws.

If you read this section of the Bill ( i.e. the section on abortion) carefully, you will see for yourself that it DOES clearly legalise infanticide. It also legalises late- term abortion all the way up to the 9th month of a pregnancy.

IMO both pregnant women who request, and, the obstetricians who conduct abortions in the last trimester, are (morally) evil. Ditto those who permit infanticide to be carried out.

So Trump is correct and Walz is lying through his teeth (nothing new for a Democrat).

When Kamala Harris vetted Walz for the role of her Vice Presidential running mate, I'm sure she would have asked him about his position on abortion. The conclusion I draw is that clearly Kamala has no problem at all with legalising abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month of pregnancy, or, if a baby is "born alive" after a botched abortion legally permitting it to be intentionally "left to die" without medical care.



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound
Click to expand...
“So I checked it out for myself”

NEXT
 
Did Trumpys learn all they needed about Arnold Palmer's penis a few days ago? Should he do a presser on that? He could include Melania's status when she came here. He promised a press conf. about that 9 years ago. It was happening in 2 weeks.
 
Joe said:
What would you like to call him? Defecation?
Click to expand...

In reality I kinda like the name "Tampon Tim". It's got that alliteration (that's where the first letter of the words is the same) and it is kinda funny (if technically incorrect).

You guys got a rare one there.

Your nickname for Kamala ("whore") is not quite as clever. But given that she's a woman and in your world all women are whores or your property there's only a limited selection)
 
Nordberg said:
Did Trumpys learn all they needed about Arnold Palmer's penis a few days ago?
Click to expand...

God knows I did. And I NEVER wanted to know this information. Now I can't unlearn it.


Nordberg said:
Should he do a presser on that? He could include Melania's status when she came here.
Click to expand...

You mean her EINSTEIN VISA? Yeah. Let's everyone talk about THAT.

Nordberg said:
He promised a press conf. about that 9 years ago. It was happening in 2 weeks.
Click to expand...

Trump is like God. A million years is like unto a day for Trump. Trust and believe, my son. Trust and believe. All will come in the fullness of time. Along with the improved healthcare plan, his taxes, and his medical records!
 
Dachshund said:
Donald TRUMP has accuse Tampon Tim Walz of supporting infanticide.

Walz has always flatly denied this.

So I checked it out for myself.

Turns out that in 2023 when he was Governor of Minnesota, Walz supported an omnibus Health Bill that radically changed his state's abortion laws.

If you read this section of the Bill ( i.e. the section on abortion) carefully, you will see for yourself that it DOES clearly legalise infanticide. It also legalises late- term abortion all the way up to the 9th month of a pregnancy.

IMO both pregnant women who request, and, the obstetricians who conduct abortions in the last trimester, are (morally) evil. Ditto those who permit infanticide to be carried out.

So Trump is correct and Walz is lying through his teeth (nothing new for a Democrat).

When Kamala Harris vetted Walz for the role of her Vice Presidential running mate, I'm sure she would have asked him about his position on abortion. The conclusion I draw is that clearly Kamala has no problem at all with legalising abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month of pregnancy, or, if a baby is "born alive" after a botched abortion legally permitting it to be intentionally "left to die" without medical care.



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound
Click to expand...
VANCE CLAIM: Vance says Walz ended protections in Minnesota for babies born alive

FACT-CHECK: False

Infanticide, the crime of killing a child within a year of its birth, is illegal in all U.S. states.

In May 2023, Walz, as Minnesota governor, signed legislation updating a state law for "infants who are born alive." This change did not alter the fact that under state law, these babies are protected.

Previously, state law said, "All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant." The law was updated to instead say medical personnel must "care for the infant who is born alive."

The law's updated version also kept the provision that said, "An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law."

Every person who is born has legal protections under federal and state laws, experts told PolitiFact.

-PolitiFact's Sara Swann
abc7ny.com

Vice presidential debate fact check: Claims made by Gov. Tim Walz and Sen. JD Vance

In the first and only vice-presidential debate of the 2024 election, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance went head-to-head on the nation's most pressing issues.
abc7ny.com abc7ny.com
 
Phantasmal said:
VANCE CLAIM: Vance says Walz ended protections in Minnesota for babies born alive

FACT-CHECK: False

Infanticide, the crime of killing a child within a year of its birth, is illegal in all U.S. states.

In May 2023, Walz, as Minnesota governor, signed legislation updating a state law for "infants who are born alive." This change did not alter the fact that under state law, these babies are protected.

Previously, state law said, "All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant." The law was updated to instead say medical personnel must "care for the infant who is born alive."

The law's updated version also kept the provision that said, "An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law."

Every person who is born has legal protections under federal and state laws, experts told PolitiFact.

-PolitiFact's Sara Swann
abc7ny.com

Vice presidential debate fact check: Claims made by Gov. Tim Walz and Sen. JD Vance

In the first and only vice-presidential debate of the 2024 election, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance went head-to-head on the nation's most pressing issues.
abc7ny.com abc7ny.com
Click to expand...
Just because you write fact check false in bold lettering doesn't change the truth. That Sara Swann at politifacts is a lying cunt.
 
Trumpet said:
What should we call Trump?????? Lunatic????
Click to expand...
That's what you do call him so do you have a point? Of course you do not. Your simple mind hasn't the attention span to make even a simple cogent point.

My point was churching up the language doesn't change the truth. Walz is a pile of shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top