Tea Party members - This is NOT the way to win an argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Sorry, but nothing I stated above is fiction or illogical. Bottom line: there are HUNDREDS of tag lines signifying befuddlement from dozens of sitcom characters over the years. It's no coincidence that these teabaggers use a black character to stick it to a black president. Like I said, it's not the worse, but it's a racial insult none-the-less. It only seems a "stretch" to you because you've never lived a life being on the receiving end on the many variations of racial put downs, overt and covert.

Jesus, you leave the board for a few days, and you miss some hilarious shit.

Exactly, man. You nailed it. . I'm as white-bread as they come, and even my lily white ass can see the racial context in that sign. Not to mention all the other racially charged images and signs the teabaggers carry around.

Actually, I'm not surprised that the wingnut contingent - asshat zombie, southernman, and damocles - tried valiantly to defend their beloved teabaggers and their racist associations. It's patently obvious to the non-retarded person that the reference to a sitcom line, delivered by a black kid with an ethnic inflection in tone, wasn't targeted merely by accident at a black president. Fuck man, Obama is harvard educated and speaks better english than any teabagger.


Another thing I"m not surprised at all about: tea bag defenders trying to blame this on liberal "infiltrators", rather than confront and purge the racism in their own movement. Gut-bustingly hilarious! What's more likely? That birkenstock wearing liberals infiltrated the tea bag party, and yelled nigger and fag at some liberal politicians? Or that teabaggers - who have been photo documented carrying racially charged signs - would actually do it. Ha! What a joke, it's beyond reasonable doubt that the nigger and fag-yelling cabal were devout tea baggers. Yo man, the deal with most cons (and I proudly salute Winterborn for not falling in this category) is that They're happy to have the votes of racists, and to associate with them - the deal with the devil they made is that they don't want their racists publically embarrassing them or their party. This ain't rocket science. It's the freakin' Southern Strategy of Ronnie Raygun.

They are a truly pathetic lot...being led like lambs to the slaughter to defend the very people that are screwing them over...and then they wave the flag and Constitution while trying to excuse the one of the most base and vile negativity of the human social condition.

Bottom line: telling a kid there's no Santa clause is can have dire consequences if that kid has a gun! ;)
 
:palm: David Duke FAILED at all his political attempts running as a Dem, but won as a GOPer....a matter of fact, a matter of history. So the GOP in Louisiana found a former KKK Grand Wizard more to their liking for a state rep. But that's as far as he got, because he failed under the GOP for a Senate and presidential bid.

Once again, I have to school you on your myopic and revisionist tainted view of history.

Bottom line: YOU are trying to excuse blatant examples racist taunts and insults with the same convoluted BS that Duke uses to justify his white supremacist bilge. YOU are one f***ed up puppy!
You forget that I've schooled you on this before Libbie, last November:

Duke won that seat with a narrow majority and his opponent was endorsed by both George HW Bush and Reagan. He only managed to keep the seat for two years. He got no support at all from the GOP and Democrat voters supported him far more than Republican voters.

Then you called me a liar, which didn't take either. Again your attempt to equate The Southern Man with David Duke failed miserably.

And just to remind you, this is all because you're trying to find racism where it doesn't exist. :)
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Are you saying that what Cypress showed and what the subject title of this thread discusses is NOT racist in nature?

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
So you don't have the stones to make a declarative statement on the matter? You got your mouth open on every other subject....seems a simple honest answer shouldn't tax your mind and personal courage so.

Open wider.

Just as I thought....you've got nothing....just another gutless neocon mindfart.

Say Goodnight Gracie.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
David Duke FAILED at all his political attempts running as a Dem, but won as a GOPer....a matter of fact, a matter of history. So the GOP in Louisiana found a former KKK Grand Wizard more to their liking for a state rep. But that's as far as he got, because he failed under the GOP for a Senate and presidential bid.

Once again, I have to school you on your myopic and revisionist tainted view of history.

Bottom line: YOU are trying to excuse blatant examples racist taunts and insults with the same convoluted BS that Duke uses to justify his white supremacist bilge. YOU are one f***ed up puppy!

You forget that I've schooled you on this before Libbie, last November:

Originally Posted by Southern Man
Duke won that seat with a narrow majority and his opponent was endorsed by both George HW Bush and Reagan. He only managed to keep the seat for two years. He got no support at all from the GOP and Democrat voters supported him far more than Republican voters.

Then you called me a liar, which didn't take either. Again your attempt to equate The Southern Man with David Duke failed miserably.

And just to remind you, this is all because you're trying to find racism where it doesn't exist. :)


:palm: He WON ON THE GOP TICKET, YOU FUCKING MORON! That means that the good folk of Louisiana supported his racist bilge AS A REPUBLICAN. If his main support were Democrats, THEN HE WOULD HAVE WON ON THAT TICKET....BUT HE DIDN'T. This wasn't during the time of the "radical republicans" versus "dixie-crat" rule. Two years in office under the GOP banner, LOCALLY..which meant he didn't need Reagan or Bush endorsement....a matter of fact, a matter of history.

You are a liar, as I prove over and over again. You're attempts to distort and revise history just won't cut it. Not only do I school you on basic facts, but I always take you to task on decent research and critical analysis. Seems you didn't learn your lesson in November...now you got a remedial course!

Like I said, you're just another 3rd rate racist propagandists with delusions of intelligence...logic and facts will always be your undoing, despite your repetitive nonsense of substituting your supposition, conjecture and myopic revisionism as bonafide fact. So your documented attempts to excuse the heinous and racist actions of your teabagging heros is just par for the course.
 
Once again, I have to school you on your myopic and revisionist tainted view of history.

Bottom line: YOU are trying to excuse blatant examples racist taunts and insults with the same convoluted BS that Duke uses to justify his white supremacist bilge. YOU are one f***ed up puppy!




:palm: He WON ON THE GOP TICKET, YOU FUCKING MORON! That means that the good folk of Louisiana supported his racist bilge AS A REPUBLICAN. If his main support were Democrats, THEN HE WOULD HAVE WON ON THAT TICKET....BUT HE DIDN'T. This wasn't during the time of the "radical republicans" versus "dixie-crat" rule. Two years in office under the GOP banner, LOCALLY..which meant he didn't need Reagan or Bush endorsement....a matter of fact, a matter of history.

You are a liar, as I prove over and over again. You're attempts to distort and revise history just won't cut it. Not only do I school you on basic facts, but I always take you to task on decent research and critical analysis. Seems you didn't learn your lesson in November...now you got a remedial course!

Like I said, you're just another 3rd rate racist propagandists with delusions of intelligence...logic and facts will always be your undoing, despite your repetitive nonsense of substituting your supposition, conjecture and myopic revisionism as bonafide fact. So your documented attempts to excuse the heinous and racist actions of your teabagging heros is just par for the course.

make up your mind...did he win on the Republican platform or racist bilge?.....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Once again, I have to school you on your myopic and revisionist tainted view of history.

Bottom line: YOU are trying to excuse blatant examples racist taunts and insults with the same convoluted BS that Duke uses to justify his white supremacist bilge. YOU are one f***ed up puppy!




He WON ON THE GOP TICKET, YOU FUCKING MORON! That means that the good folk of Louisiana supported his racist bilge AS A REPUBLICAN. If his main support were Democrats, THEN HE WOULD HAVE WON ON THAT TICKET....BUT HE DIDN'T. This wasn't during the time of the "radical republicans" versus "dixie-crat" rule. Two years in office under the GOP banner, LOCALLY..which meant he didn't need Reagan or Bush endorsement....a matter of fact, a matter of history.

You are a liar, as I prove over and over again. You're attempts to distort and revise history just won't cut it. Not only do I school you on basic facts, but I always take you to task on decent research and critical analysis. Seems you didn't learn your lesson in November...now you got a remedial course!

Like I said, you're just another 3rd rate racist propagandists with delusions of intelligence...logic and facts will always be your undoing, despite your repetitive nonsense of substituting your supposition, conjecture and myopic revisionism as bonafide fact. So your documented attempts to excuse the heinous and racist actions of your teabagging heros is just par for the course.

make up your mind...did he win on the Republican platform or racist bilge?.....

:palm: Once more for the mentally challenged.....He won the STATE REP. running as a REPUBLICAN...he won the GOP nomination running on his racist rhetoric (unless you can factually prove he totally renounced his racist past and changed his ways during and after the campaign...good luck with that).

Next time you run to Southie's defense, try being smarter than he is.
 
Once again, I have to school you on your myopic and revisionist tainted view of history.

Bottom line: YOU are trying to excuse blatant examples racist taunts and insults with the same convoluted BS that Duke uses to justify his white supremacist bilge. YOU are one f***ed up puppy!




:palm: He WON ON THE GOP TICKET, YOU FUCKING MORON! That means that the good folk of Louisiana supported his racist bilge AS A REPUBLICAN. If his main support were Democrats, THEN HE WOULD HAVE WON ON THAT TICKET....BUT HE DIDN'T. This wasn't during the time of the "radical republicans" versus "dixie-crat" rule. Two years in office under the GOP banner, LOCALLY..which meant he didn't need Reagan or Bush endorsement....a matter of fact, a matter of history.

You are a liar, as I prove over and over again. You're attempts to distort and revise history just won't cut it. Not only do I school you on basic facts, but I always take you to task on decent research and critical analysis. Seems you didn't learn your lesson in November...now you got a remedial course!

Like I said, you're just another 3rd rate racist propagandists with delusions of intelligence...logic and facts will always be your undoing, despite your repetitive nonsense of substituting your supposition, conjecture and myopic revisionism as bonafide fact. So your documented attempts to excuse the heinous and racist actions of your teabagging heros is just par for the course.

Again, Duke won by less than 51% in a single district after changing his party affiliation, and in spite of his opponent being endorsed by Bush 41 and Reagan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_..._in_special_election_for_Louisiana_House_seat


Furthermore, Duke's promotion of sodomy puts him in line with Liberals, not with conservatives:

Using the pseudonym Dorothy Vanderbilt, Dr. Duke published a self-help book for women titled Finders-Keepers in 1976. The publication gives advice to women regarding vaginal exercises, fellatio, anal sex, and anilingus. http://en.allexperts.com/e/d/da/david_duke.htm


As in last November, your attempt to equate The Southern Man with David Duke failed miserably.

And just to remind you, this is all because you're trying to find racism where it doesn't exist.
 
I'm totally surprised to learn (or, perhaps its not surprising) that oral s&x and other variations of heterosexual sex acts are a "liberal" thing. Sheesh, no wonder I've never dated a rightwing gal. Doing nothing but missionary once a month seems pretty boring. But to each their own! Are cons allowed to have sex on Sunday, or is that also blasphemous?
 
First of all, sodomy is derived from homosexual acts. Second, no conservative gal would date you because you're a liberal, hence a sicko and a failure.
 
I'm totally surprised to learn (or, perhaps its not surprising) that oral s&x and other variations of heterosexual sex acts are a "liberal" thing. Sheesh, no wonder I've never dated a rightwing gal. Doing nothing but missionary once a month seems pretty boring. But to each their own! Are cons allowed to have sex on Sunday, or is that also blasphemous?

Thats why some of them are against dancing. People might think they were having sex.

Those who call oral sex bad are to be pitied.
 
First of all, sodomy is derived from homosexual acts. Second, no conservative gal would date you because you're a liberal, hence a sicko and a failure.

Sodomy (which includes oral sex) was not derived from homosexual acts. Straight people have been doing it since the beginning of time.



Let me ask you a question, SM. What is your opinion (or belief) about masturbation?
 
Solitary, and the subject of masturbation. How ironic. :lol:

Not at all. You have expressed your views on several sexual acts. Now I am asking you your opinion on a virtually universal act.

Why would you be afraid to answer a simple question?
 
Maybe Solitary can find another stalker or troll to discuss masturbation with, or maybe on another board. The Southern Man doesn't see how it relates to just plain politics. :)
 
Maybe Solitary can find another stalker or troll to discuss masturbation with, or maybe on another board. The Southern Man doesn't see how it relates to just plain politics. :)

You have already engaged in a discussion of sodomy. YOu have expressed your views on it numerous times.

Why are you afraid to answer a simple question? I am not asking you to get into a detailed discussion about the subject. I have no interest in that at all. I am asking you about your opinion on something.

Why the fear?
 
First of all, sodomy is derived from homosexual acts. Second, no conservative gal would date you because you're a liberal, hence a sicko and a failure.

Here's one that will mess with your head...

Which came first...

homosexual buttsex...

Or...

deviant hetero buttsex!?!

Maybe anal and/or oral sex got "invented" because Cain and/or Abel got tired of waiting for Dad to finish up in the one hole God said was okay to use?
 
You have already engaged in a discussion of sodomy. YOu have expressed your views on it numerous times.

Why are you afraid to answer a simple question? I am not asking you to get into a detailed discussion about the subject. I have no interest in that at all. I am asking you about your opinion on something.

Why the fear?

Because a "real man" is scared to admit he bops the baloney.
 
Here's one that will mess with your head...

Which came first...

homosexual buttsex...

Or...

deviant hetero buttsex!?!

Maybe anal and/or oral sex got "invented" because Cain and/or Abel got tired of waiting for Dad to finish up in the one hole God said was okay to use?

Well you seem to have a "grip" on it Fat Boy. So is this what you do when the women get tired of you yanking on the string around your wrist?

You seem to really being "getting in to this discussion". Kind of all in a twitter.

Go ahead Closet Boy. Let it all out now!
 
Back
Top