Teabaggers laugh at women who's daughter they are responsible for killing

Hey mimi, here's a newsflash. It was a townhall meeting and everybody was invited to give input, not just those against health care reform. For somebody who regularly spouts off about free speech, you don't seem to want that right extended to those you disagree with.

That being said, it was absolutely despicable to heap scorn on a grieving family, no matter what their political affiliation. Is nothing sacred anymore? You started a thread criticizing Norah O'Donnell for her calmly-stated remarks to a teenager, but you're sticking up for these POSs who would mock the Hough family for a death. You all definitely need to take a step back and ask yourselves if this is the way you'd want somebody to react over your loss.

You probably can't see it but this kind of behaviour hurts the TP movement more than helps it. It paints those supporters as fanatical, uncaring idiots, which I'm sure is not the way most RWs are in real life.
'

Yep, we are all selfish SOB's who only care about ourselves.
 
What the LW's don't realize is it isn't the family's income that matters for WIC, only the girl's. So it's foolish to suggest the income history of her family has anything to do with it at all.

How to Qualify for WIC

WIC is a government sponsored nutrition program that provides healthy foods for pregnant women, new mothers, infants, and children up to the age of 5. The program is open to families with a low to medium income. Learn more about the WIC program and if you qualify.

Step 1

First, you will need to determine if you financially qualify to participate in the WIC program. Guidelines are based on the household income and the number of women and children in the household. To see a table with the WIC income guidelines, see the link in the resources section below.

Step 2

You must have proof of income for the adults in your household. Paycheck stubs are fine. Fortunately, WIC guidelines are not as strict as for other government supplement programs. If you already qualify for a government assistance program such as Food Stamps or Medicaid, they you will automatically qualify for the WIC Program.

Step 3

You will need to show proof of your permanent address. You can show a recent utility bill such as your electric or water bill.

Step 4

The applying parent will need a valid photo ID.

Step 5

Multiple household members can qualify for the WIC program. Each qualifying family member can receive benefits and separate vouchers.

Step 6

If you qualify, you will need to contact your local WIC office to apply. Call 1-888-WIC-WORKS to get started. See the resources section below for a link to a list of state and local WIC agencies.

Step 7

See the resources section below for more ways to get free food for your family during these tough times.

It's ludicrous for anybody to state with certainty that she could have gotten help for the asking. Nobody knows what the family income was.
 
the left is the people of compassion..they want to give others things by stealing others monies through the Government then they can crow about how "they care" more..and lets not forget the compassion they have for future UNBORN children being sucked from a mothers womb because they are just CELLS and it's a free choice......

and they say it's conservative who are heartless..:good4u:

Why write such nonsense as "they want to give others things by stealing others monies through the Government then they can crow about how "they care" more.."

Any government program that requires money will take money from the left, as well as the right, so why make it sound as if the left isn't participating?

Of course the left are more compassionate. They know their money will be used, as well, but they still support the various programs.

You'll have to come up with a better line than that. :)
 
the left is the people of compassion..they want to give others things by stealing others monies through the Government then they can crow about how "they care" more..and lets not forget the compassion they have for future UNBORN children being sucked from a mothers womb because they are just CELLS and it's a free choice......

and they say it's conservative who are heartless..:good4u:

It's been over 36 years since Roe v. Wade. Maybe you can explain why, in all this time, repubs haven't gotten up a strong grass-roots movement to overturn it, especially during the years when repubs controlled both the WH and Congress.

If you were being completely honest, you'd admit that legalized abortion is supported by the majority and the majority, as righties like to say, is center or center-right.

Roevwade.png
 
It's been over 36 years since Roe v. Wade. Maybe you can explain why, in all this time, repubs haven't gotten up a strong grass-roots movement to overturn it, especially during the years when repubs controlled both the WH and Congress.

If you were being completely honest, you'd admit that legalized abortion is supported by the majority and the majority, as righties like to say, is center or center-right.

Roevwade.png

what the hell does have to do with your party and the "compassion" you all show by flaunting and proudly supporting of the killing of ones own child and calling it a CHOICE...

I'm not getting into this discussion again..
 
what the hell does have to do with your party and the "compassion" you all show by flaunting and proudly supporting of the killing of ones own child and calling it a CHOICE...

I'm not getting into this discussion again..

It has to do with YOUR party supporting the same thing.
 
She didn't die from a pregnancy-related condition, she had "severe double pneumonia, septic shock and respiratory failure", so why are you all making this about prenatal care?

BECAUSE SHE WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN UNDER A DOCTOR'S CARE.

Gawd, I'm truly beginning to believe that Liberals are really naive. :palm:
 
Now, now. Don't hemorrhage.

Read my last post to Damocles and do try to grasp the contents.

If special medical coverage is intended to protect pregnant women, if the goal is to ensure pregnant women get adequate medical services, why would a hospital refuse to run a few inexpensive tests?

If a woman qualified for a free card today the chances are she qualified yesterday. If that's the case why wouldn't the cost be born by the insurance IF the goal is to protect pregnant women?

No one knows why she didn't have a card. Maybe she had a good reason.

Again, rather than run a few tests while determining why she doesn't have a card and helping her to obtain one the hospital's greed led to the woman's death.

In case you're still having difficulty understanding the point is rules and procedures to do with payment/money resulted in her death. That should not be the case. That should never happen.

Whether the card is free, whether she just never bothered to pick one up.....the point is her not having a card should not have led to her death. A person's life should not depend on whether or not they have a card.

Forget the reasons why she didn't have a card. Look at the result. That's the point.


You just go ahead and continue to rant and rave, while sitting astride your faux hypocritical high horse; because you're obviously to stupid to understand and you don't have the intelligence to google what you're whining about.

If nothing else, your continual self-induced stupidity is amusing.

HEY LOOK, APPLE.
THERE'S A RABBIT. :palm:
 
The reform is the first step. It is because of the opponents that there are still restrictions and the need to "qualify" for something or other. As I mentioned before obstacles have been set up so the course is anything but straight.

I have no illusions the proposed bill is anywhere near perfect. It can't be because of all the exceptions and exclusions and the need to qualify and all the other things the opposition demanded be placed in it.

It is, however, a step in the right direction.

For example, the obligation to have insurance. Today, an uninsured woman who becomes pregnant needs to consider insurance not only for herself but for her future offspring. That will no longer be the case because she will already be insured.

If one changes jobs or becomes unemployed it's easy to put the purchase of insurance off until things "settle down". It's easy to go uninsured for a month or so hoping the next job will offer insurance coverage. That will end. Everyone will be obliged to be insured whether working or not working.

People will become accustomed to being insured, regardless of circumstances, and some will be grateful because something will happen that will require them to be insured and they will realize that if they had the option they probably wouldn't have had insurance at that particular time. For example, during a job change.

As time progresses people will see that insurance should be automatic, as with a universal plan.

That is the goal. The opponents are making it as difficult as possible, thus, the problems you mention but they will be ironed out, one by one.



"...People will become accustomed to being insured..."

Kind of like slaves will eventually become accostomed to being owned. :good4u:

Good job. :palm:
 
What the LW's don't realize is it isn't the family's income that matters for WIC, only the girl's. So it's foolish to suggest the income history of her family has anything to do with it at all.

Forget aboiut it Damo.
They aren't going to be happy, until everything is "free"; as long as it's paid for, by someone else.
 
I believe it's because of the way they were treated.

There used it be Poster ADS here showing a mistreated child and the Ad read, "Violence begets violence."

It's the same principal. People think it's good for others to suffer, to do without, to scratch and scrape their way through life because that's what many had to do.

Why would anyone help someone if they were never helped themselves? They continue the cycle.

It's madness, as you noted. But things are changing. Slowly.


Fuck off apple, you self-righteous bitch. :321:
 
Why write such nonsense as "they want to give others things by stealing others monies through the Government then they can crow about how "they care" more.."

Any government program that requires money will take money from the left, as well as the right, so why make it sound as if the left isn't participating?

Of course the left are more compassionate. They know their money will be used, as well, but they still support the various programs.

You'll have to come up with a better line than that. :)


The left only uses money, to hold other people down.
Liberals have become the new slave owners.
 
You just go ahead and continue to rant and rave, while sitting astride your faux hypocritical high horse; because you're obviously to stupid to understand and you don't have the intelligence to google what you're whining about.

If nothing else, your continual self-induced stupidity is amusing.

HEY LOOK, APPLE.
THERE'S A RABBIT. :palm:

That's exactly what my wife said this morning! Yes, there was rabbit in my back yard earlier today! New home construction over the last few years has disturbed their territory.

Last year I build a rabbit house. Well, actually a rabbit dining room. It looks like a small dog house. I even used asphalt shingles on the roof. The difference is there are two doors. Well, actually two circular openings, one at each end. Rabbits won't go into a place if it doesn't have another exit.

So, over the winter I place carrots and rabbit food in there and they dine at their convenience.

As for my faux hypocritical high horse as I wrote earlier the people who propose social plans also contribute to them so it's not a case of singling out the right-wing. Although it does appear that, generally, the right-wing feels taken advantage of. Perhaps you can shed some light on that.
 
That's exactly what my wife said this morning! Yes, there was rabbit in my back yard earlier today! New home construction over the last few years has disturbed their territory.

Last year I build a rabbit house. Well, actually a rabbit dining room. It looks like a small dog house. I even used asphalt shingles on the roof. The difference is there are two doors. Well, actually two circular openings, one at each end. Rabbits won't go into a place if it doesn't have another exit.

So, over the winter I place carrots and rabbit food in there and they dine at their convenience.

As for my faux hypocritical high horse as I wrote earlier the people who propose social plans also contribute to them so it's not a case of singling out the right-wing. Although it does appear that, generally, the right-wing feels taken advantage of. Perhaps you can shed some light on that.


I'm gong to take a page from your book.

She had access to medical care and she choose not to utilize it. :palm:
 
Back
Top