๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—–๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น...

You are the one who is desperate . I gave you reasons to believe Iran was a nuclear breakout nation. In all of Human history no country has ever enriched to 60% U235 and not built a nuclear weapon.

Remember when You told me you thought Biden's confused language during speeches was just stuttering? Do you still think he was just stuttering?
You had to change my quote? I never said this: "In all of Human history no country has ever enriched to 60% U235 and not built a nuclear weapon."

All of these countries have nuclear weapons but the only one who launched them in combat was the US. Why aren't you worried about Russia or NK, who already have them?

"Nine countries are known to possess nuclear weapons: the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel."

This isn't about "but, Biden." It's about dementia don's failing health, a topic you are studiously avoiding.
 
Under the 2015 JCPOA, Iran did not agree to โ€œanytime, anywhere, no-noticeโ€ inspections of every military or suspicious site. For undeclared locations, the IAEA could request access, and if Iran objected, the dispute-resolution process was supposed to resolve access within 24 days.

Iran has had undeclared nuclear-related activity and facilities in the past. The IAEA has also found uranium particles at undeclared locations and has said Iran has not provided technically credible explanations. In 2024, the IAEA Board said Iran had not explained uranium particles at several undeclared locations, and that the agency could not confirm the correctness and completeness of Iranโ€™s declarations until those issues were resolved.


IranWatch.org ? โ˜๐Ÿผ

Who funds them....?

1000091665.jpg


1) the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control

2) the Smith Richardson Foundation.

Both hawkish, conservative leaning organizations that automatically see everything Iran does as a threat.

The fact remains that even with any tricky little maneuvers Iran might have engaged in, they would not have been able to pull the wool over our eyes far enough to hide or disguise a full blown nuclear weapons production program.

We did not need to be in this position we're in now because of trump's bone headed, ham-fisted bumbling and mishandling of our foreign policy.

He is an amateur and a fuck-up on every level and you people through your ignorance are responsible for the damage he's doing.
 
noballs is triggered

Yes, but he has been posting the identical sick shit that Cole Allen did for well over a year.

These Marxists are violent and dangerous.

Noballs is a danger to himself and others. And he does seem like he is about to go off on a violent episode.

Hopefully the Secret Service or other law enforcement puts him down before he does any real damage.
 
Editing someoneโ€™s quote to say they want to kill the president isnโ€™t banter. Itโ€™s fabricating a federal crime and putting it in someone elseโ€™s mouth. You donโ€™t get to hide behind jokes when you cross into that territory.
 
IranWatch.org ? โ˜๐Ÿผ

Who funds them....?

View attachment 82249


1) the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control

2) the Smith Richardson Foundation.

Both hawkish, conservative leaning organizations that automatically see everything Iran does as a threat.

The fact remains that even with any tricky little maneuvers Iran might have engaged in, they would not have been able to pull the wool over our eyes far enough to hide or disguise a full blown nuclear weapons production program.

We did not need to be in this position we're in now because of trump's bone headed, ham-fisted bumbling and mishandling of our foreign policy.

He is an amateur and a fuck-up on every level and you people through your ignorance are responsible for the damage he's doing.
Dismissing Iran Watch because you dislike its funding does not erase the IAEAโ€™s findings. The IAEA itself said Iran failed to declare nuclear material and activities at undeclared locations and that it could not assure the world Iranโ€™s program was exclusively peaceful.


Also, โ€œthey couldnโ€™t hide a full-blown weapons production programโ€ is a straw man. The real issue is not whether Iran could secretly run a giant cartoon bomb factory. The issue is whether Iran could maintain enrichment capacity, advanced centrifuges, uranium stockpiles, undeclared-material ambiguity, and enough breakout capability to move fast if it chose to weaponize.


You may be right that Trump handled the JCPOA badly. But โ€œTrump made it worseโ€ is not the same thing as โ€œIran was never a serious nuclear risk.โ€ Both things can be true.
 
Yep in America you don't try to change the government with a gun.
In this particular case, what the assassin was doing, reading his manifesto and other stuff that's been put out, was being a vigilante. He saw himself as bringing justice to what he saw as a lawless, criminal, administration. I'll kill Trump and his administration's top advisors and cabinet members because they are not obeying the law and are criminals...

That amounts to vigilantism.

Changing the government at the end of a gun barrel is what revolutionaries, particularly Leftist revolutionaries do.
 
Shows that the SPLC wasn't responsible.
The SPLC was only obliquely responsible. They as with all of the Left leaning media out there have bombarded the US population with a continuous drumbeat of negative and hateful messaging and rhetoric about Trump. The MSM is well over 90% negative messaging and news reporting on the administration.

That is a problem.
 
Back
Top