APP - Texas board adopts new social studies curriculum

Don Quixote

cancer survivor
Contributor
looks like a combination of racists and people that still have not gotten the message that the south lost the civil war and want to revise, water down and otherwise revise and violate the history of our nation

By APRIL CASTRO

AUSTIN, Texas - The Texas State Board of Education adopted a social studies and history curriculum Friday that amends or waters down the teaching of the civil rights movement, slavery, America's relationship with the U.N. and hundreds of other items.
The ideological debate over the guidelines, which drew intense scrutiny beyond Texas, will be used to teach some 4.8 million Texas students for the next 10 years.
The standards also will be used by textbook publishers who often develop materials for other states based on those approved in Texas, although teachers in the Lone Star state have latitude in deciding which material to teach.
The board took separate votes on standards for high schools and kindergarten through eighth grades. The final vote was 9-5 on each set of standards.
The debate has brought national attention, including testimony from educators, civil rights leaders and a former U.S. education secretary.
The ideological dispute contributed to the defeat of one of the board's most outspoken conservatives, Chairman Don McLeroy, in the March state Republican primary.
In final edits leading up to the vote, conservatives rejected language to modernize the classification of historic periods to B.C.E. and C.E. from the traditional B.C. and A.D. They also required that public school students in Texas evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty.
McLeroy offered the amendment requiring students to evaluate efforts by global organizations including the U.N. to undermine U.S. sovereignty, saying they threatened individual liberty and freedom.
During the monthslong process of creating the guidelines, conservatives successfully strengthened the requirements on teaching the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers and attempted to water down rationale for the separation of church and state.
The standards will refer to the U.S. government as a "constitutional republic," rather than "democratic," and students will be required to study the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.
Conservatives say the Texas history curriculum has been unfairly skewed to the left after years of Democrats controlling the board.
Educators have blasted the proposed curriculum for politicizing education. Teachers also have said the document is too long and will force students to memorize lists of names rather than thinking critically.

link
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/21/texas.textbook.vote/index.html
 
Last edited:
About time too.

The sooner people are made to acknowledge the UN's evil plan to take over America, the safer the children of Texas will be.

I'm positive nothing but good can come of this prudent step forward.
 
About time too.

The sooner people are made to acknowledge the UN's evil plan to take over America, the safer the children of Texas will be.

I'm positive nothing but good can come of this prudent step forward.

i do not particularly care about the un, but our nation's history is something that i do care about and those people want to revise it
 
It was just as optional when CA was deciding what was in all the books. The difference isn't in truth, it's in what they focused on.
 
It was just as optional when CA was deciding what was in all the books. The difference isn't in truth, it's in what they focused on.

it appears that the final version is different from what was touted by the media

still a text book produced by a partisan group is not a good thing, it should be the province of a bi-partisan group of educators or just a group of educators

i will post a link to the final version when i can find one

anyone that knows of such a link please post it
 
Maybe we can leave out the Trail of Tears, so no child ever has to learn that EVERY nation has positive and negative history. Those who are allowed to edit their history don't have to know when they repeat it.
 
This makes me sick to my stomach. Got any room there in NM, Soc? We don't want to retire here, anyway.
 
Maybe we can leave out the Trail of Tears, so no child ever has to learn that EVERY nation has positive and negative history. Those who are allowed to edit their history don't have to know when they repeat it.

Surely you aren't implying that the great and wonderful USofA has any negative history??
 
They also required that public school students in Texas evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty.
McLeroy offered the amendment requiring students to evaluate efforts by global organizations including the U.N. to undermine U.S. sovereignty, saying they threatened individual liberty and freedom. .


Awesome. I unconditionally support what these educators aware of the internationalists elite plot to subjugate the american populace in a foreign controlled economic control matrix which dictates every aspect of our lives ...um... are doing.
 
Pretty much the only school district in the nation that's probably going to be shielded from these changes is going to be the one in California. The kids in my hometown will be receiving this education. This is disgusting - one school board should not have dominance over the entire nation simply because it is large and (unlike California) doesn't completely and totally dictate everything in the curriculum. IMHO, it's time for national standards. That way, the voters of the US will have control over their textbooks, rather than the voters of Texas having control over ours.
 
still a text book produced by a partisan group is not a good thing, it should be the province of a bi-partisan group of educators or just a group of educators

its always been produced by a partisan group....it's just now we have a different partisan group involved, so the media is in an uproar.....
 
This makes me sick to my stomach. Got any room there in NM, Soc? We don't want to retire here, anyway.
What I don't understand Thorn is why there is such a strong reactionary force in this nation. Particularly the south and rural midwest. Is it cultural and racial diversity that is driving white southern conservatives over this reactionary and self destructive cliff? Are they unable to cope with the "browning" or this nation? I know from my experience in the rural midwest that much of these reactionary forces are driven by the Alienation that many working class whites feel due to their inability to keep up with the changes that have occurred in this nation that have so heavily impacted their community and economies. Particularly the transfering of our labor intensive indsutries over seas. I think this is a significant cause. Instead of reacting in a rational manor to these conditions and adapting/evolving their education and/or skill sets to meet the new changing conditions they react with an irrational desire to turn back to clock back to an imaginary ideal which has really never existed in this country.
 
What I don't understand Thorn is why there is such a strong reactionary force in this nation. Particularly the south and rural midwest. Is it cultural and racial diversity that is driving white southern conservatives over this reactionary and self destructive cliff? Are they unable to cope with the "browning" or this nation? I know from my experience in the rural midwest that much of these reactionary forces are driven by the Alienation that many working class whites feel due to their inability to keep up with the changes that have occurred in this nation that have so heavily impacted their community and economies. Particularly the transfering of our labor intensive indsutries over seas. I think this is a significant cause. Instead of reacting in a rational manor to these conditions and adapting/evolving their education and/or skill sets to meet the new changing conditions they react with an irrational desire to turn back to clock back to an imaginary ideal which has really never existed in this country.

Curious if you were ascribing this belief to only those with conservative political beliefs?

Seems like we have more than a few people, and not just those with conservative political beliefs, that want us to go back to a time when manufactoring was done in the U.S. and many of the workers belonged to unions which supposedly gave us a strong middle class.
 
Imagine wanting students to learn that our government was founded as a Constitutional Republic...:cool:
and that's the problem with you radical revisionist wingnuts. You know little if nothing about our history and you make just these completely silly comments. Our founding fathers wrote a constitution to be the frame work for a government that is a democratic republic.

What is it about you guys on the far right that you despise freedom for anyone but yourself?
 
Curious if you were ascribing this belief to only those with conservative political beliefs?

Seems like we have more than a few people, and not just those with conservative political beliefs, that want us to go back to a time when manufactoring was done in the U.S. and many of the workers belonged to unions which supposedly gave us a strong middle class.
That's a good point. Most of those alienated whites I'm talking about are now conservative republicans but most of these same people were very strong union democrats 20 or 30 years ago. I don't think this nation will ever go back to the days of large number of high paying unskilled manufacturing jobs. The competition for cheap labor around the world is just keen. Those are days that are not coming back and that's the source of alienation I see in many small town and rural whites in the south and midwest but you do make a valid point. Those attitudes I described do not fall wholly down the lines of political ideology (i.e. conservatism) but in general most of these rural/small town whites have abandoned liberal labor untion democrats, who have been impotent at preserving a life style that is simply going away and not coming back.

In other words, small town and rural America has failed to evolve, adapt and change to existing historical conditions and that it is this resistance to accept the neccessity of change which has driven many small town and rural whites to the extreme right reactionary fringe.

The actions of the Texas Board of Education, in it's attempt to revise our history to a history that has never existed in this nation, is just a sign of this malaise affecting a substantial portion of our population.
 
and that's the problem with you radical revisionist wingnuts. You know little if nothing about our history and you make just these completely silly comments. Our founding fathers wrote a constitution to be the frame work for a government that is a democratic republic.

What is it about you guys on the far right that you despise freedom for anyone but yourself?

You can be such a fucking pinhead:

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States"]United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg" class="image" title="Flag of the United States"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a4/Flag_of_the_United_States.svg/125px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/a/a4/Flag_of_the_United_States.svg/125px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png[/ame] (also referred to as the United States, the U.S., the USA, or America /əˈmɛrɪkə/) is a federal constitutional republic comprising fifty states and a federal district.
 
The United States is a Constitutional Republic that is governed through representative democracy.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic"]Constitutional republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] :)
 
Back
Top