Why? Be specific. Tell me how you can pass a law that is in direct violation of the Constitution. This should be good.
Texas sues Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania over election fraud
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
Why? Be specific. Tell me how you can pass a law that is in direct violation of the Constitution. This should be good.
There is nothing stopping every state from suing every other state, and if this lawsuit were to succeed, that would be the precedent. I know there is only one law suit. I'm talking about the ramifications.
You're welcome.
Since I didn't say that, there is no need to tutor you, Concarty.
You aren't bright enough to build straw-men.
I don't have to prove there wasn't fraud by providing you with signatures. You have to provide clear and convincing evidence of fraud before the court will even entertain your claim. The court said that the "experts" were allowed to examine a sample of the ballots and those experts could not testify that they found evidence of any fraud in that sample. Since there is no evidence of fraud there is no reason to invalidate the election simply because you don't like who was elected.
Yes, you did. Support your position. I said that Congress cannot pass a law standardizing Federal elections. You said I was wrong. Tell me why. Be specific.
Remember, Concarty, read the post first and then respond.
Only one state has sued, Concarty...Texas, 18 states have joined but there is only one law suit.
You're welcome.
Right back at you Earl. I said they could. I did not say they did. Which word are you having trouble with?
On the basis i dont trust either party to not cheat. Both sides have been accusing each other of cheating the last two elections, so it's not just me. The possibility of cheating should at least be mitigated.
Good. Maybe both sides can work out a solution for a change and pass one.
You're going to have to amend the Constitution first moron
Ballots have always been counted up to a week after an election. There is nothing unusual about this election when it comes to counting ballots other than the fact that so many states were so close that the media wasn't willing to call a winner. In 2016, Clinton led nationwide by less than 2 million votes the day after the election. When all the ballots were counted a week later she led by over 3 million. Every election sees millions of ballots counted the week after the election. This was no different other than Trump followers are whiney babies that refuse to accept that their man lost.
Your law IQ opioid addiction has you confused and delusional the comment was relative to a national voting standard which can't be done without amending the Constitution so I know how important it is for you to be a moron but try and do a better job of picking when you're a moron
You conflated the Texas case to every state, Concarty.
Read your posts after you post them.
By 'on what basis' I really meant on what authority. I'm not sure what a national standard would do to help alleviate the claims of cheating. Those claims are completely unsubstantiated. They would have been made regardless of what rules were in place.
True but I could see red states disallowing mail in ballots and blue states cancelling voting booths altogether.
No, i did not. I said they could. I did not say they had. Your inability to comprehend is your problem, not mine.
He said CONGRESS not the states. Take your own advice. Read the post before responding.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Disagreed. Consider the precedent of nominating a Justice in an election year. Do you really think the Democrats are going to let themselves get burned again by lying hypocrites? No, they won't. The precedent has been set.
The only difference I see is that, maybe, Congress will pass some restrictions on verifying the election process. Specifically to avoid tying up the courts with frivolous lawsuits. A good way, IMO, is to make the frivolous lawsuit filer pay all legal costs for both sides if they lose.
Either way, if the 2000 or 2016 election had taken place in 2024, do you really think the outcome would have been the same?
Well, cabron, my posts referred to state elections and changes that can only be done by state legislators, not state courts.
Do you understand now?
You conflated the Texas case to every state, Concarty.
Read your posts after you post them.