The 2022 Nobel physics prize winner has all you need to know to debunk climate idiocy

Serendipshitty is just another run of the mill nobody who (he claims) managed to get a lower level degree in something that is not even specific to the subject in question, boasting about how he has all the answers in opposition to the real specialists in the field who've spent their lives in the professional observation and analysis of it.

And he actually expects the rest of us to abandon them and follow the idiocy that he and the likes of Bigdogshit subscribe to. :plalm:

If you weren't so fucking lazy you could have looked up the equivalent to a 2:1 in the US but sadly no, you're too intent on being a bullshiiter.
 
Serendipshitty is just another run of the mill nobody who (he claims) managed to get a lower level degree in something that is not even specific to the subject in question, boasting about how he has all the answers in opposition to the real specialists in the field who've spent their lives in the professional observation and analysis of it.

And he actually expects the rest of us to abandon them and follow the idiocy that he and the likes of Bigdogshit subscribe to. :plalm:

Name some of the real specialists, I bet you can't.
 
Serendipshitty is just another run of the mill nobody who (he claims) managed to get a lower level degree in something that is not even specific to the subject in question, boasting about how he has all the answers in opposition to the real specialists in the field who've spent their lives in the professional observation and analysis of it.

And he actually expects the rest of us to abandon them and follow the idiocy that he and the likes of Bigdogshit subscribe to. :plalm:

I seem to recall that you have a degree in pubic management aka lady gardening.
 
Serendipshitty is just another run of the mill nobody who (he claims) managed to get a lower level degree in something that is not even specific to the subject in question, boasting about how he has all the answers in opposition to the real specialists in the field who've spent their lives in the professional observation and analysis of it.

And he actually expects the rest of us to abandon them and follow the idiocy that he and the likes of Bigdogshit subscribe to. :plalm:

Uh huh. And you think your C average in chemistry qualifies you an expert in climate science.

Fanlight Phanny claims to ignore me but here she is anyway. Please note that the upper end of a 2:1 is equivalent to a GPA of 3.7, remind us all what degree and GPA you attained?
 
Last edited:
If you weren't so fucking lazy you could have looked up the equivalent to a 2:1 in the US but sadly no, you're too intent on being a bullshiiter.

If you weren't so scared of exposing yourself as a fraud, you'd post proof that you actually hold such a degree.

Name some of the real specialists, I bet you can't.

Why are their individual names important? The agencies they work for back their findings as do the vast majority of real scientists (as opposed to fake, corporate whore, sell out scientists and online phonies who claim to hold science degrees) worldwide, so I put my faith in what common sense and a lifetime of familiarity with the real world tells me.

If it were a lie, the vast majority of legitimate experts would not be backing it.

The LIE is what the small handful of opportunistic fame seekers who you put your faith in tell you.

I seem to recall that you have a degree in pubic management aka lady gardening.

IOW a field that is only slightly less relevant to climate science than the one you claim but have not proven to possess.

:fu:
 
If you weren't so scared of exposing yourself as a fraud, you'd post proof that you actually hold such a degree.



Why are their individual names important? The agencies they work for back their findings as do the vast majority of real scientists (as opposed to fake, corporate whore, sell out scientists and online phonies who claim to hold science degrees) worldwide, so I put my faith in what common sense and a lifetime of familiarity with the real world tells me.

If it were a lie, the vast majority of legitimate experts would not be backing it.

The LIE is what the small handful of opportunistic fame seekers who you put your faith in tell you.



IOW a field that is only slightly less relevant to climate science than the one you claim but have not proven to possess.

:fu:

If you don't believe me then I couldn't care less, I'm certainly not going to assist you in any way.
 
Last edited:
Climate Catastrophism and the Grip of Culture
.

A new book from the Global Warming Policy Foundation makes the startling claim that climate change catastrophism has become cultural – a secular religion. But while such claims are often made, The Grip of Culture actually sets out hard evidence to support its case.

Author Andy A. West explains:

“The US social psychologist Dan Kahan has shown that you can detect the presence of tribal or cultural behaviours by measuring public attitudes. My work applies this ‘cultural cognition’ approach to the climate domain.”

West shows that the apparently schizophrenic attitudes to climate change exhibited by publics across the world – simultaneously expressing great concern about the issue, and unwillingness to do anything about it – can be explained as the interaction between traditional religions and a new faith of climate catastrophism.

West says:

“The results are extraordinarily strong – much better than anything else in the literature. They can even predict real world phenomena, such as the deployment of renewables across countries or the prevalence of climate protest groups.”

But the book also carries a warning to society. Because cultures work through subconscious behaviours, they are entirely irrational. They can lead to the building of great civilisations, but also to their complete and utter collapse.

West warns:

“We are in a dangerous place. We can see irrational policies being put in place as a result of emergent cultural fears. It’s quite possible – probable even – that we are engaged in the destruction of those industries that support our civilisation, and only to serve cultural needs that are entirely at odds with mainstream climate science.”


THE GRIP OF CULTURE
Andy A. West

The social psychology of climate change catastrophism
can be purchased via Amazon, and is also available as a free PDF download at:

https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uplo...re6by9-v28.pdf

https://judithcurry.com/2023/07/13/...e-social-psychology-of-climate-catastrophism/
 
Climate Catastrophism and the Grip of Culture
.

A new book from the Global Warming Policy Foundation makes the startling claim that climate change catastrophism has become cultural – a secular religion. But while such claims are often made, The Grip of Culture actually sets out hard evidence to support its case.

Author Andy A. West explains:

“The US social psychologist Dan Kahan has shown that you can detect the presence of tribal or cultural behaviours by measuring public attitudes. My work applies this ‘cultural cognition’ approach to the climate domain.”

West shows that the apparently schizophrenic attitudes to climate change exhibited by publics across the world – simultaneously expressing great concern about the issue, and unwillingness to do anything about it – can be explained as the interaction between traditional religions and a new faith of climate catastrophism.

West says:

“The results are extraordinarily strong – much better than anything else in the literature. They can even predict real world phenomena, such as the deployment of renewables across countries or the prevalence of climate protest groups.”

But the book also carries a warning to society. Because cultures work through subconscious behaviours, they are entirely irrational. They can lead to the building of great civilisations, but also to their complete and utter collapse.

West warns:

“We are in a dangerous place. We can see irrational policies being put in place as a result of emergent cultural fears. It’s quite possible – probable even – that we are engaged in the destruction of those industries that support our civilisation, and only to serve cultural needs that are entirely at odds with mainstream climate science.”


THE GRIP OF CULTURE
Andy A. West

The social psychology of climate change catastrophism
can be purchased via Amazon, and is also available as a free PDF download at:

https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uplo...re6by9-v28.pdf

I gather that it offends you as a man trained in science that it offends you that ideologically possessed Evil FUCKS who claim to be following science are lying there asses off for career advancement?





Just A Guess.
 
I gather that it offends you as a man trained in science that it offends you that ideologically possessed Evil FUCKS who claim to be following science are lying there asses off for career advancement?





Just A Guess.

Take Martin as an example, it's clear that he's very much subject to the behaviour described by social psychologist
Dan Kahan. He accused me of being scientifically unlearned so I told him that I had a degree in chemistry. Undaunted he then said that hardly makes me an expert, I hadn't claimed that, but it's far more than he possesses I'm guessing. I've asked him on several occasions before about his academic background but he has always steadfastly refused to answer, you can draw your own conclusions from that.
 
Last edited:
Take Martin as an example, it's clear that he's very much subject to the behaviour described by social psychologist
Dan Kahan. He accused me of being scientifically unlearned so I told him that I had a degree in chemistry. Undaunted he then said that hardly makes me an expert, I hadn't claimed that, but it's far more than he possesses I'm guessing. I've asked him on several occasions before about his academic background but he has always steadfastly refused to answer, you can draw your own conclusions from that.

You do understand that I am a Zennist right?
 
GPA of 69 is a D plus, one grade above failing. You must have excelled yourself.

It hasn't gone unnoticed that you steadfastly refuse to declare your academic background, guess I'll have to stop calling you Smarty then. I achieved 69% the top end of the 2:1 scale or a GPA of 3.7. You will be on ignore from now on, you're just a colossal bore and not very bright.

UK degrees are classified out of 100, and are: 1st - 70 or above. 2:1 - 60 to 69. 2:2 - 50 to 59.
 
Last edited:
It hasn't gone unnoticed that you steadfastly refuse to declare your academic background, guess I'll have to stop calling you Smarty then. I achieved 69% the top end of the 2:1 scale or a GPA of 3.7. You will be on ignore from now on, you're just a colossal bore and not very bright.

UK degrees are classified out of 100, and are: 1st - 70 or above. 2:1 - 60 to 69. 2:2 - 50 to 59.

So boring you can't stop replying to me.

I have a posted profile. The details are my business.
 
Back
Top